[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16337408#comment-16337408
]
Attila Sasvari commented on OOZIE-2681:
---
{{mvn clean deploy -Papache-release -DskipTests fails with the following while
generating Javadoc:}}
{code:java}
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.4:jar (attach-javadocs) on
project oozie-tools: MavenReportException: Error while generating Javadoc:
[ERROR] Exit code: 1 -
/Users/asasvari/workspace/apache/oozie_master_push/tools/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/tools/OozieDBExportCLI.java:44:
error: self-closing element not allowed
[ERROR] *
[ERROR] ^
[ERROR]
/Users/asasvari/workspace/apache/oozie_master_push/tools/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/tools/OozieDBExportCLI.java:44:
warning: empty tag
[ERROR] *
[ERROR] ^
[ERROR]
/Users/asasvari/workspace/apache/oozie_master_push/tools/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/tools/OozieDBExportCLI.java:49:
error: self-closing element not allowed
[ERROR] *
[ERROR] ^
[ERROR]
/Users/asasvari/workspace/apache/oozie_master_push/tools/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/tools/OozieDBExportCLI.java:49:
warning: empty tag
[ERROR] *
[ERROR] ^
[ERROR]
/Users/asasvari/workspace/apache/oozie_master_push/tools/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/tools/OozieDBImportCLI.java:82:
error: self-closing element not allowed
[ERROR] *
[ERROR] ^
[ERROR]
/Users/asasvari/workspace/apache/oozie_master_push/tools/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/tools/OozieDBImportCLI.java:82:
warning: empty tag
[ERROR] *
[ERROR] ^
[ERROR]
/Users/asasvari/workspace/apache/oozie_master_push/tools/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/tools/OozieDBImportCLI.java:88:
error: self-closing element not allowed
[ERROR] *
[ERROR] ^
[ERROR]
/Users/asasvari/workspace/apache/oozie_master_push/tools/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/tools/OozieDBImportCLI.java:88:
warning: empty tag
[ERROR] *
[ERROR] ^
[ERROR]
{code}
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Peter Cseh
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0b1
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.06.patch, OOZIE-2681.07.patch, OOZIE-2681.08.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.09.patch, OOZIE-2681.10.patch, OOZIE-2681.11.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.12.patch, OOZIE-2681.13.patch, OOZIE-2681.14.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.15.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16278774#comment-16278774 ] Andras Piros commented on OOZIE-2681: - Thanks for the patch [~gezapeti]! +1 > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Peter Cseh >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 5.0.0b1 > > Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch, > OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch, > OOZIE-2681.06.patch, OOZIE-2681.07.patch, OOZIE-2681.08.patch, > OOZIE-2681.09.patch, OOZIE-2681.10.patch, OOZIE-2681.11.patch, > OOZIE-2681.12.patch, OOZIE-2681.13.patch, OOZIE-2681.14.patch, > OOZIE-2681.15.patch > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16278757#comment-16278757
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch contains 1 line(s) longer than 132
characters
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 1 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in total.
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 2075
.Tests rerun: 94
.Tests failed at first run:
org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestJavaActionExecutor,org.apache.oozie.service.TestStatusTransitService,
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/273/
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Peter Cseh
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0b1
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.06.patch, OOZIE-2681.07.patch, OOZIE-2681.08.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.09.patch, OOZIE-2681.10.patch, OOZIE-2681.11.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.12.patch, OOZIE-2681.13.patch, OOZIE-2681.14.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.15.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16274343#comment-16274343
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch contains 1 line(s) longer than 132
characters
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 1 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in total.
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 2074
.Tests rerun: 55
.Tests failed at first run:
org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestJavaActionExecutor,
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/270/
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Peter Cseh
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0b1
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.06.patch, OOZIE-2681.07.patch, OOZIE-2681.08.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.09.patch, OOZIE-2681.10.patch, OOZIE-2681.11.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.12.patch, OOZIE-2681.13.patch, OOZIE-2681.14.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16274263#comment-16274263 ] Peter Cseh commented on OOZIE-2681: --- Tests are passing locally. > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Peter Cseh >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 5.0.0b1 > > Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch, > OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch, > OOZIE-2681.06.patch, OOZIE-2681.07.patch, OOZIE-2681.08.patch, > OOZIE-2681.09.patch, OOZIE-2681.10.patch, OOZIE-2681.11.patch, > OOZIE-2681.12.patch, OOZIE-2681.13.patch, OOZIE-2681.14.patch > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16273668#comment-16273668
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch contains 1 line(s) longer than 132
characters
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 1 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in total.
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:red}-1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 2074
.Tests failed: 6
.Tests errors: 1
.The patch failed the following testcases:
. testJMXInstrumentation(org.apache.oozie.util.TestMetricsInstrumentation)
.
testSqoopActionWithRedundantArgsAndFreeFormQuery(org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestSqoopActionExecutor)
.
testSqoopActionWithArgsAndFreeFormQuery(org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestSqoopActionExecutor)
. testSqoopEval(org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestSqoopActionExecutor)
.
testSqoopActionWithRedundantPrefix(org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestSqoopActionExecutor)
. testSqoopAction(org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestSqoopActionExecutor)
.Tests failing with errors:
. testHive2Action(org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestHive2ActionExecutor)
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/269/
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Peter Cseh
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0b1
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.06.patch, OOZIE-2681.07.patch, OOZIE-2681.08.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.09.patch, OOZIE-2681.10.patch, OOZIE-2681.11.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.12.patch, OOZIE-2681.13.patch, OOZIE-2681.14.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16271936#comment-16271936
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch contains 1 line(s) longer than 132
characters
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 1 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:red}-1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch seems to introduce 1 new Javadoc warning(s)
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in total.
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 2074
.Tests rerun: 74
.Tests failed at first run:
org.apache.oozie.command.coord.TestCoordActionInputCheckXCommandNonUTC,org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestJavaActionExecutor,
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/266/
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Peter Cseh
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0b1
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.06.patch, OOZIE-2681.07.patch, OOZIE-2681.08.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.09.patch, OOZIE-2681.10.patch, OOZIE-2681.11.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.12.patch, OOZIE-2681.13.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16271119#comment-16271119
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch contains 1 line(s) longer than 132
characters
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 1 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in total.
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 2074
.Tests rerun: 64
.Tests failed at first run:
org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestJavaActionExecutor,org.apache.oozie.service.TestJMSAccessorService,org.apache.oozie.command.coord.TestCoordActionsKillXCommand,
{color:red}-1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:red}-1{color} distro tarball fails with the patch
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/265/
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Peter Cseh
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0b1
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.06.patch, OOZIE-2681.07.patch, OOZIE-2681.08.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.09.patch, OOZIE-2681.10.patch, OOZIE-2681.11.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.12.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16270821#comment-16270821
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch contains 1 line(s) longer than 132
characters
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 1 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:red}-1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch seems to introduce 1 new Javadoc warning(s)
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in total.
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 2074
.Tests rerun: 55
.Tests failed at first run:
org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestJavaActionExecutor,
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/263/
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Peter Cseh
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0b1
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.06.patch, OOZIE-2681.07.patch, OOZIE-2681.08.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.09.patch, OOZIE-2681.10.patch, OOZIE-2681.11.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16269752#comment-16269752
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch contains 1 line(s) longer than 132
characters
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 1 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in total.
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 2074
.Tests rerun: 63
.Tests failed at first run:
org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestJavaActionExecutor,org.apache.oozie.util.TestMetricsInstrumentation,org.apache.oozie.command.coord.TestCoordActionsKillXCommand,
{color:red}-1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:red}-1{color} distro tarball fails with the patch
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/262/
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Peter Cseh
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0b1
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.06.patch, OOZIE-2681.07.patch, OOZIE-2681.08.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.09.patch, OOZIE-2681.10.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16269271#comment-16269271
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than
132
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch does not add/modify any testcase
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in total.
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 2071
.Tests rerun: 57
.Tests failed at first run:
org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestJavaActionExecutor,org.apache.oozie.command.coord.TestCoordActionsKillXCommand,
{color:red}-1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:red}-1{color} distro tarball fails with the patch
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/260/
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Peter Cseh
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0b1
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.06.patch, OOZIE-2681.07.patch, OOZIE-2681.08.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.09.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16268996#comment-16268996
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than
132
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch does not add/modify any testcase
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in total.
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
. {color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 2071
.Tests rerun: 57
.Tests failed at first run:
org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestJavaActionExecutor,org.apache.oozie.command.coord.TestCoordActionsKillXCommand,
{color:red}-1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:red}-1{color} distro tarball fails with the patch
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-OOZIE-Build/259/
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Peter Cseh
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0b1
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.06.patch, OOZIE-2681.07.patch, OOZIE-2681.08.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16268715#comment-16268715
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:red}-1{color} Patch failed to apply to head of branch
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Peter Cseh
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0b1
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch,
> OOZIE-2681.06.patch, OOZIE-2681.07.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16268705#comment-16268705 ] Peter Cseh commented on OOZIE-2681: --- Patch 07 reverts the change in OOZIE-2487, so future builds will break if there are javadoc warnings introduced. > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Peter Cseh >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 5.0.0b1 > > Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch, > OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch, > OOZIE-2681.06.patch > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16268698#comment-16268698 ] Peter Cseh commented on OOZIE-2681: --- I've just found this Jira. This would cover a lot of other issues as well. I've taken the liberty of picking this up due to the lack of response since March. I'm attaching a fix. > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Peter Cseh >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 5.0.0b1 > > Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch, > OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16237402#comment-16237402
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:red}-1{color} Patch failed to apply to head of branch
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Abhishek Bafna
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0b1
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15943566#comment-15943566
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than
132
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch does not add/modify any testcase
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in total.
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in
[hadooplibs/hadoop-utils-2].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 1906
.Tests rerun: 19
.Tests failed at first run:
org.apache.oozie.command.coord.TestCoordActionsKillXCommand,org.apache.oozie.command.coord.TestCoordActionInputCheckXCommand,
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/oozie-trunk-precommit-build/3735/
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Abhishek Bafna
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch, OOZIE-2681-04.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15942900#comment-15942900
]
Peter Bacsko commented on OOZIE-2681:
-
Some mistakes left:
{{@throws JPAExecutorException thrown if any JPA error}}
{{@throws IOException thrown if any IO errors.}}
{{OozieClientException thrown if any error occurs getting error logs}} ("while"
missing)
{{@throws OozieActionConfiguratorException thrown if error into loading the
oozie configuration class.}}
{{OozieActionConfiguratorException thrown if error while updating the
configuration}}
{{@throws ServiceException thrown if error while initialization}}
{{@throws LauncherException thrown if error into instantiating URI handler.}}
{{@throws CommandException thrown if error while verifying}}
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Abhishek Bafna
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15942576#comment-15942576 ] Abhishek Bafna commented on OOZIE-2681: --- The testcase passes locally. Thanks. > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Abhishek Bafna >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 5.0.0 > > Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch, > OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15941817#comment-15941817
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than
132
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch does not add/modify any testcase
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in total.
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in
[hadooplibs/hadoop-utils-2].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:red}-1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 1906
.Tests failed: 0
.Tests errors: 1
.The patch failed the following testcases:
.
.Tests failing with errors:
. testJMXInstrumentation(org.apache.oozie.util.TestMetricsInstrumentation)
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/oozie-trunk-precommit-build/3734/
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Abhishek Bafna
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15941756#comment-15941756 ] Abhishek Bafna commented on OOZIE-2681: --- [~pbacsko] and [~gezapeti] updated the patch. Please have a look. Thanks. > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Abhishek Bafna >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 5.0.0 > > Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch, > OOZIE-2681-02.patch, OOZIE-2681-03.patch > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15940248#comment-15940248 ] Abhishek Bafna commented on OOZIE-2681: --- [~pbacsko] I will take a another look and fix them. Thanks. > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Abhishek Bafna >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 5.0.0 > > Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch, > OOZIE-2681-02.patch > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15940246#comment-15940246 ] Peter Bacsko commented on OOZIE-2681: - Looks good, I just have a single comment. Some grammatical mistakes should be fixed, like "if any error" should be " if any error occurs". Example: "if any error suspending the jobs" should be "if any error occurs while suspending the jobs". There some mistakes like this scattered around the code. Not a big deal, but should be fixed nonetheless. Thanks. > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Abhishek Bafna >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 5.0.0 > > Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch, > OOZIE-2681-02.patch > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15935704#comment-15935704 ] Abhishek Bafna commented on OOZIE-2681: --- Thanks [~asasvari] for the review. [~gezapeti] and [~pbacsko] Can you please take a look? Thanks. > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Abhishek Bafna >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 5.0.0 > > Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch, > OOZIE-2681-02.patch > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15935484#comment-15935484 ] Attila Sasvari commented on OOZIE-2681: --- +1 (non-binding) > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Abhishek Bafna >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 5.0.0 > > Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch, > OOZIE-2681-02.patch > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15817312#comment-15817312 ] Abhishek Bafna commented on OOZIE-2681: --- Thanks [~andras.piros] for the review on RB. [~satishsaley] can you please take look? Thanks. > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Abhishek Bafna >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 5.0.0 > > Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch, > OOZIE-2681-02.patch > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15728163#comment-15728163 ] Andras Piros commented on OOZIE-2681: - [~abhishekbafna] those are flaky tests, +1 from my side (non-binding). [~rkanter] Since FindBugs uses bytecode, it cannot analyze Javadoc. For that we'd need CheckStyle. > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Abhishek Bafna >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 5.0.0 > > Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch, > OOZIE-2681-02.patch > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15727643#comment-15727643 ] Abhishek Bafna commented on OOZIE-2681: --- [~rkanter] Can you please take a look. Thanks. > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Abhishek Bafna >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 5.0.0 > > Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch, > OOZIE-2681-02.patch > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15726695#comment-15726695
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than
132
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch does not add/modify any testcase
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in total.
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [server].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [docs].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/streaming].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/distcp].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/pig].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/spark].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive2].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/sqoop].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/oozie].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hive].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [sharelib/hcatalog].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [core].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [examples].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in
[hadooplibs/hadoop-utils-2].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [client].
.{color:green}+1{color} There are no new bugs found in [tools].
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:red}-1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 1831
.Tests failed: 5
.Tests errors: 3
.The patch failed the following testcases:
. testPigScript(org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestPigMainWithOldAPI)
. testEmbeddedPigWithinPython(org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestPigMain)
. testPigScript(org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestPigMain)
. testPig_withNullExternalID(org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestPigMain)
. testMain(org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestHiveMain)
.Tests failing with errors:
. testAddXIncludeFromStream(org.apache.oozie.util.TestXConfiguration)
. testAddXIncludeFromReader(org.apache.oozie.util.TestXConfiguration)
. testLoadDump(org.apache.oozie.tools.TestDBLoadDump)
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/oozie-trunk-precommit-build/3492/
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Abhishek Bafna
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch, OOZIE-2681-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2681-02.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15677388#comment-15677388
]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2681:
--
Testing JIRA OOZIE-2681
Cleaning local git workspace
{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:red}-1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch contains 1 line(s) longer than 132
characters
.{color:red}-1{color} the patch does not add/modify any testcase
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc
warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac
warnings
{color:red}-1{color} FindBugs diff JAR has a weird MD5 sum, rejecting.
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.{color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
.Tests run: 1828
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.{color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}
The full output of the test-patch run is available at
. https://builds.apache.org/job/oozie-trunk-precommit-build/3450/
> fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
>
>
> Key: OOZIE-2681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
>Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Abhishek Bafna
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0.0
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2681-00.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build
> on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all
> of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more.
> OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail,
> but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2681) fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15511689#comment-15511689 ] Robert Kanter commented on OOZIE-2681: -- It might also make sense to modify test-patch to catch these so we don't keep introducing them without knowing. > fix javadoc to compile on JDK8 again > > > Key: OOZIE-2681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2681 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build >Affects Versions: 4.3.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 4.4.0 > > > We have a lot of Javadoc build failures, which causes Oozie to fail to build > on Java 8, which is more strict than Java 6 or 7 was. OOZIE-2178 fixed all > of these that existed at that time, but we've since introduced a lot more. > OOZIE-2487 made a workaround to prevent this from causing the build to fail, > but we should fix these (again) and remove the OOZIE-2487 workaround. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
