Re: [DISCUSS] openjpa-3.0.0 roadmap
Have not looked at the schema generator changes in JPA-2.1 yet. I only have a few spare hours per week and will not be able to implement it for m1. Happy if someone else can jump in. LieGrue, strub > On Tuesday, 11 October 2016, 9:51, Romain Manni-Bucau> wrote: > > +1 on the overall goal (of course since we discussed it ;)) > > Is there any hope to get the javax.persistence.* ddl and > PersistenceProvider.generateSchema (for Persistence.generateSchema call) > impl for m1? Think it is one of the most used 2.1 feature. I checked > quickly and we are not that far (we mainly miss the ability to generate > dropDdl) to support that but I'm quite off this game this month :(. > > Romain > > > 2016-10-11 9:48 GMT+02:00 Francesco Chicchiriccò : > >> On 11/10/2016 09:47, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I've exchanged ideas with Romain how we can push OpenJPA-3.0.0. >>> >>> To finish implementing all JPA-2.1 features will cost us some time. >>> But it would be quite easy to ship milestone releases with a well >>> specified set of features (and ongoing bugfixes). >>> >>> E.g.: >>> >>> # openjpa-3.0.0-m1 >>>* API and lib upgrade (done) >>>* bugfixes (quite a few done) >>>* improved OSGi support (done) >>> >>>* stored procedure support (done) >>>* SynchronizationType suport (wip) >>> >>> # openjpa-3.0.0-m2 >>>* you name it >>> >>> Timeframe would be about 2 months for each milestone. >>> I would like to start with m1 after the SynchronizationType support is >>> done (hope to do it in the next 2 weeks) >>> >>> >>> Wdyt? >>> >> >> >> +1 >> Thanks for your effort in pushing the 3.0.0 (and JPA 2.1) forward! >> >> Regards. >> >> -- >> Francesco Chicchiriccò >> >> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence >> http://www.tirasa.net/ >> >> Member at The Apache Software Foundation >> Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail >> http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ >> >> >
Re: [DISCUSS] openjpa-3.0.0 roadmap
+1 on the overall goal (of course since we discussed it ;)) Is there any hope to get the javax.persistence.* ddl and PersistenceProvider.generateSchema (for Persistence.generateSchema call) impl for m1? Think it is one of the most used 2.1 feature. I checked quickly and we are not that far (we mainly miss the ability to generate dropDdl) to support that but I'm quite off this game this month :(. Romain 2016-10-11 9:48 GMT+02:00 Francesco Chicchiriccò: > On 11/10/2016 09:47, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I've exchanged ideas with Romain how we can push OpenJPA-3.0.0. >> >> To finish implementing all JPA-2.1 features will cost us some time. >> But it would be quite easy to ship milestone releases with a well >> specified set of features (and ongoing bugfixes). >> >> E.g.: >> >> # openjpa-3.0.0-m1 >> * API and lib upgrade (done) >> * bugfixes (quite a few done) >> * improved OSGi support (done) >> >> * stored procedure support (done) >> * SynchronizationType suport (wip) >> >> # openjpa-3.0.0-m2 >> * you name it >> >> Timeframe would be about 2 months for each milestone. >> I would like to start with m1 after the SynchronizationType support is >> done (hope to do it in the next 2 weeks) >> >> >> Wdyt? >> > > > +1 > Thanks for your effort in pushing the 3.0.0 (and JPA 2.1) forward! > > Regards. > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Member at The Apache Software Foundation > Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > >
Re: [DISCUSS] openjpa-3.0.0 roadmap
On 11/10/2016 09:47, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi! I've exchanged ideas with Romain how we can push OpenJPA-3.0.0. To finish implementing all JPA-2.1 features will cost us some time. But it would be quite easy to ship milestone releases with a well specified set of features (and ongoing bugfixes). E.g.: # openjpa-3.0.0-m1 * API and lib upgrade (done) * bugfixes (quite a few done) * improved OSGi support (done) * stored procedure support (done) * SynchronizationType suport (wip) # openjpa-3.0.0-m2 * you name it Timeframe would be about 2 months for each milestone. I would like to start with m1 after the SynchronizationType support is done (hope to do it in the next 2 weeks) Wdyt? +1 Thanks for your effort in pushing the 3.0.0 (and JPA 2.1) forward! Regards. -- Francesco Chicchiriccò Tirasa - Open Source Excellence http://www.tirasa.net/ Member at The Apache Software Foundation Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/