The conversation below happened in public, but not on the OpenOffice
public lists. I believe it's good to record its outcome here on the
OpenOffice dev list too.
Summary:
- Question from Jim Jagielski: Is a contribution under ALv2 + MPL +
LGPLv3+ acceptable to both OpenOffice and LibreOffice
Dave Fisher wrote on Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 15:35:31 -0800:
On Mar 8, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 8 March 2013 22:16, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher
Hi
I have been using office for years without problems.
Today I tried updating to 3.4 - with disastrous results. It has taken me
all morning to get rid of the wretched thing. When opening 3.4 all I got
was a blue mark on the screen about 20mm by 4 mm.
I tried reinstalling a couple of times. So
On 9 March 2013 12:52, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 03/03/2013 janI wrote:
On 3 March 2013 17:47, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
1) Check on the Pootle 2.5 release date and features.
I would like to see it running on other sites the translate itself, but I
am just a negative
janI wrote:
That does not (as I read it) state that we can bypass RTC for
non-committers. Allowing non-committers access is one thing, but allowing
them to change the source (in this case text) directly is quite another.
Sure. The setting for new volunteers would be:
1) No paperwork, no ICLA,
On 13-03-09, at 05:39 , Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
The conversation below happened in public, but not on the OpenOffice public
lists. I believe it's good to record its outcome here on the OpenOffice dev
list too.
Yes; thanks!
Summary:
- Question from Jim Jagielski: Is
It is not clear to me that the Apache OpenOffice statement answers the
question as it was asked at [tdf-discuss]. I read Jim's question as
being about multi-licensing (dual- or more). Not about a contributor
making a contribution of their original work in two places and under
different licenses
I have made this grant known to The Document Foundation and the
LibreOffice project. The TDF notification appears at
http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg09424.html.
If any use of my contributions to LibreOffice by Apache Projects is
questioned, you can cite this grant if
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org
wrote:
I
Right now, for top level categories on cwiki, we have the following:
-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-Translate-Plan?moved=true#
Project
Planninghttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Project+Planning
-
I am personally fine with whatever you do along the lines of surfacing current
planning efforts and archiving old efforts.
For cwiki articles that should be moved to Mwiki then perhaps a For MWiki
category would make sense.
If you need someone with full confluence admin rights let me know, I'm
The periodic report to the Apache Board about the status of the
OpenOffice project and community is due in about one month. You can find
an initial draft of the April report at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2013+Apr
but it is almost completely empty and not worth reading
12 matches
Mail list logo
