From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
no it means the benefit of the patches is so minimal that a rewrite is
probably cheaper and easier. For the example for 1 use case we have
integrated we spend a lot of time to understand the patch and realize
that the implementation
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of
course dictionary updates.
2) Fixes for any critical bugs,
On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
Being a customer, I do see things differently.
Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF.
theoretically correct, but practically?
One day in future LO will save ODF as a secondary
option.
On 24/10/14 07:22, soyol aron wrote:
Hi all,
I have some question about installing OO‘ sdk. I know that this topic is
might not be appropriate for discussing at here. But I can't subscribe to
the a...@openoffice.apache.org, It always return me the message like below
at the step I confirm my
On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote:
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of
course dictionary updates.
2)
On 24.10.2014 10:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote:
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have,
Dňa 24.10.2014 o 09:59 Jürgen Schmidt napísal(a):
On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
Being a customer, I do see things differently.
Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF.
theoretically correct, but practically?
One day in
Am 24.10.2014 um 09:59 schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
For example:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Berliner-Finanzaemter-wechseln-zurueck-auf-Microsoft-Office-2430961.html
I believe a decision like the one in Berlin is always political
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:00 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have,
Hello list,
I answer frequently in Bugzilla.
I propose to help and managing reports like set to Duplicate or Invalid.
If you are interesting, I remain available.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote:
Hello,
From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
Being a customer, I do see things differently.
Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF.
theoretically correct, but practically?
One day in future LO will
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:32 AM, FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr wrote:
Hello list,
I answer frequently in Bugzilla.
I propose to help and managing reports like set to Duplicate or Invalid.
If you are interesting, I remain available.
Thanks. This kind of database hygiene is always welcome.
On 10/24/2014 01:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
But where is the problem? Either OOXML *is* ISO standard or is not
ISO-standard. If the problem is however that MS is 'meddling' in the
standard, then it is a political issue that requires policy responses
- not a question of software development.
Those who know the history know that Apache OpenOffice is the
continuation of the OpenOffice.org project, which itself came from a
proprietary suite developed in Germany called StarOffice, which itself
started as StarWriter, an application written in 1985 by Marco Börries
.
So next year, in 2015,
2014-10-24 16:41 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir r...@robweir.com:
Those who know the history know that Apache OpenOffice is the
continuation of the OpenOffice.org project, which itself came from a
proprietary suite developed in Germany called StarOffice, which itself
started as StarWriter, an application
orcnote inline
-Original Message-
From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 01:03
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: the question about installing OO‘ sdk
On 24/10/14 07:22, soyol aron wrote:
Hi all,
I have some question about
orcnote below.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 06:18
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)
On 10/24/2014 01:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
But
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Roberto Galoppini
roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-10-24 16:41 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir r...@robweir.com:
Those who know the history know that Apache OpenOffice is the
continuation of the OpenOffice.org project, which itself came from a
proprietary suite
Hello,
the mailer daemon is going on the rampage.
The unacceptable MIME part was my GPG signature. Excepted since years.
And I put some words in the body and gave a subject.
I'm not able to moderate user postings.
Kind regards
Michael
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: failure
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote:
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to
have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever
Am 10/24/2014 10:29 AM, schrieb RA Stehmann:
On 24.10.2014 10:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote:
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1)
On 23/10/2014 Rob Weir wrote:
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release
I see another priority. But it is fully compatible with making a release
and actually the two can work together really well.
I would like to streamline our processes and remove bottlenecks and
dependencies on non-Apache systems.
On 24/10/2014 Rich Bowen wrote:
One more try - can any of you fine OpenOffice folks whip up a slide
template for ApacheCon EU, like was done for Denver?
Let's forward this to the OpenOffice dev list too (in CC) and see if it
is a yes! Volunteers? Templates to be refreshed are here:
On 10/24/2014 03:36 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 24/10/2014 Rich Bowen wrote:
One more try - can any of you fine OpenOffice folks whip up a slide
template for ApacheCon EU, like was done for Denver?
Let's forward this to the OpenOffice dev list too (in CC) and see if
it is a yes!
On 2014-10 -24, at 11:15, Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-10-24 16:41 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir r...@robweir.com:
Those who know the history know that Apache OpenOffice is the
continuation of the OpenOffice.org project, which itself came from a
proprietary suite
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4902
--
-
MzK
Success breeds complacency. Complacency breeds failure.
Only the paranoid survive.
-- Andy Grove, Intel Co-founder
Hi all,
I wonder if we couldn't encourage schools to participate to the projet in a
durable manner. Students have each year projects to realize alone or in
teams. Why not to suggest works reusable by the project. After a
discussion about that with a student who has contacts in a high school of
I have work with students doing their final project under the
OpenOffice, as an ex-lead for the education project. we had some
teachers doing open source projects withing the community, you can see
their posts on the wiki:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/HitekSchool
and Seneca:
Hello,
Is it possible with code in Basic to access to the list of Autofilter data
in Calc? Reason: filtering with basic is limited maximum with 3 criteria...
Because I need more then 3 criteria I want with basic code to use
filtering capability of Autofilter.
Thanks in advance,
Wlada
Am 25.10.2014 um 01:06 schrieb Vladislav Stevanovic:
Hello,
Is it possible with code in Basic to access to the list of Autofilter data
in Calc? Reason: filtering with basic is limited maximum with 3 criteria...
Because I need more then 3 criteria I want with basic code to use
filtering
On 10/24/2014 11:42 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
orcnote below.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 06:18
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)
orcnote below.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 17:27
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Spam (9.566):Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML
support?)
On 10/24/2014 11:42 AM, Dennis E.
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing a school paper for a very important college and I am not happy.
Your program underlined in red that the word vaginas is incorrect and penises
is correct. I do not like this and it is very sexist. Please fix it!
Add it to your word book, the dictionary project is managed outside of the
project. Check the extension page of the en-US dictionary
On Oct 24, 2014 9:49 PM, C L cccl...@hotmail.com wrote:
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing a school paper for a very important college and I am not
happy.
I tried to verify the report, and both words were valid.
On 10/24/14, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
Add it to your word book, the dictionary project is managed outside of the
project. Check the extension page of the en-US dictionary
On Oct 24, 2014 9:49 PM, C L cccl...@hotmail.com
On 10/24/2014 07:06 PM, Vladislav Stevanovic wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible with code in Basic to access to the list of Autofilter data
in Calc? Reason: filtering with basic is limited maximum with 3 criteria...
Because I need more then 3 criteria I want with basic code to use
filtering
Well, Alexandro, I think you may have added the plural of the word to
your local dictionary ;-)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B0xBe2_CQAEQITs.png
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
I tried to verify the report, and both words were valid.
On 10/24/14,
On 10/24/2014 08:50 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
orcnote below.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 17:27
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Spam (9.566):Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved
Do you know off hand if this is through OLE or some other mechanism?
I have been handed a docx files with something embedded inside that
prevents viewing because I do not happen to have that particular
application installed on my computer.
On 10/25/2014 12:50 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Am 22.10.2014 um 19:40 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10/22/2014 07:06 AM, schrieb Josef Latt:
Hi,
scheint ja niemanden zu interessieren.
ich dachte die Änderung ist schon längst gemacht. ;-)
So schnell schießen die Preußen nicht. ;-)
Wollte die Reaktionen dazu abwarten, bisher mager.
Gruß
Am
40 matches
Mail list logo
