Re: compiler warnings when building OpenOffice

2016-09-01 Thread Patricia Shanahan
I need a problem to work on. Would you like me to take a particular compiler warning and try to sort it out? On 9/1/2016 3:29 PM, Don Lewis wrote: On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: When building OpenOffice trunk revsion r1758161 as a FreeBSD port on FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT with clang 3.8.0, I get the

Re: [REPORT] CVE-2016-1513 Security Advisory

2016-09-01 Thread Marcus
Great to see that this issue is solved finally. Thanks to everyone who was involved. I want to express a special thanks to the developers Patricia, Damjan and Ariel for creating the binary files and Dennis for his coordination. :-) Marcus Am 08/30/2016 05:46 PM, schrieb Dennis E.

Re: compiler warnings when building OpenOffice

2016-09-01 Thread Don Lewis
On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote: > When building OpenOffice trunk revsion r1758161 as a FreeBSD port on > FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT with clang 3.8.0, I get the following warnings. > I'm mostly interested in the OpenOffice code and not the bundled > external code, so I specifically built the FreeBSD port it

Python update for testing

2016-09-01 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; The python we are carrying for AOO 4.2.0 (2.7.8) has many security vulnerabilities which may or may not have an effect on AOO. In order to make future updates and particularly for Python 2.7.9, in fact, we also needed to update OpenSSL, so now that Don updated OpenSSL the basic update

Re: compiler warnings when building OpenOffice

2016-09-01 Thread Don Lewis
On 1 Sep, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I need a problem to work on. Would you like me to take a particular > compiler warning and try to sort it out? Here is one: /wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-devel2/work/aoo-4.2.0/main/solver/420/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/osl/diagnose.hxx:65:25: warning:

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

2016-09-01 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi Dennis, I don't have objections to this topic, but I feel I need to make a few suggestions before this thread is either ignored or a confused mess. (1) a long, official policy statement like this is best put into a wiki page where many can edit it and it can be an easy discussion and not a

Re: compiler warnings when building OpenOffice

2016-09-01 Thread Don Lewis
On 1 Sep, To: Don Lewis wrote: > One of the -Wunused-parameter warnings led me to this questionable bit > of code in filter/source/xsltfilter/containerhelper.hxx: > > template > inline void forEachMem(FuncType pFunc, ParamType aParam) const > { > forEach(

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

2016-09-01 Thread Phillip Rhodes
> > > What alternative do you see? > > > There's no particular reason that I can see, that AOO shouldn't be able to produce secure software, issue releases and do all of those other things. We've done it in the past (and yeah, I feel guilty about saying "we" since I haven't been very active. Mea

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

2016-09-01 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Phillip Rhodes [mailto:motley.crue@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 21:49 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Dennis Hamilton > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long) > > > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

2016-09-01 Thread Phillip Rhodes
Wow, just wow. I have to say, I think even broaching this topic is a mistake. "Self-fulfilling prophecy"? Not even that, it'll be a "3rd party fulfilling prophecy" as soon as this hits the press. There are a lot of people out there who seem to have it in for AOO and have for a while... now you

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

2016-09-01 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hmm ... the discussion sounds a bit like Brexit ... With the important difference that it is now evident that Brexit didn't have a plan. Having a retirement plan is important for our users and for the ASF and while I think the discussion is sane and important I think we should focus now on the

Re: Python update for testing

2016-09-01 Thread Pedro Giffuni
On 09/01/2016 Kay Schenk wrote: On 09/01/2016 11:17 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; The python we are carrying for AOO 4.2.0 (2.7.8) has many security vulnerabilities which may or may not have an effect on AOO. In order to make future updates and particularly for Python 2.7.9, in fact, we

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

2016-09-01 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
[BCC to PMC] > -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] > Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 19:27 > To: priv...@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long) > > Hi Dennis, > >

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

2016-09-01 Thread Phillip Rhodes
> (3) I think that working towards being able to release rather than patch > as Patricia has suggested is our best way to solve the security issue. The > quick patch is not much faster and has been proven to be more of a > challenge then kick starting the broken build process. > Forgive me for

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

2016-09-01 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Phillip Rhodes [mailto:motley.crue@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 21:16 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long) > > Wow, just wow. I have to say, I think

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

2016-09-01 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Phillip Rhodes [mailto:motley.crue@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 21:23 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: priv...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long) > > > (3) I think that

Volunteering with the Apache OpenOffice Community

2016-09-01 Thread Ayaz Hussain
Hi, I am interested in gaining experience in technical writing and wanted to volunteer to create and maintain documentation for the OpenOffice project. I would like to involved in tasks such as, updating the OpenOffice Administration Guide, and/or writing other documentation. Can you tell me

RE: Independent Entity to Develop and Further AOO

2016-09-01 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 22:04 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Independent Entity to Develop and Further AOO > > Am 01.09.2016 um 00:59 schrieb Simon Phipps: > > On Wed,

Re: Release 4.2: Regressions for investigation

2016-09-01 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; FWIW, I fixed Issue 124091 a while ago. The commits are registered in Bugzilla. Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Release 4.2: Regressions for investigation

2016-09-01 Thread Kay Schenk
OK, thank you, Pedro. It came up in my search because it's not marked as RESOLVED. So, I did that just now. On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello; > > FWIW, I fixed Issue 124091 a while ago. The commits are registered in > Bugzilla. > > Pedro. > > >

Re: Independent Entity to Develop and Further AOO

2016-09-01 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:58:04 -0700 "Dennis E. Hamilton" wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 22:04 > > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > > Subject: Re: