[RELEASE COOKBOOK] Adding and structuring the content

2016-10-15 Thread Marcus
Am 10/14/2016 12:11 AM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Marcus wrote: Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release You just need to add some text. Don't care about formatting or order. We will do this later when

Re: [RELEASE COOKBOOK] Adding and structuring the content

2016-10-15 Thread Marcus
Am 10/15/2016 11:18 AM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt: I can see that the English press release is to be published in the blog. questions: -- 1. Is it really only published there? Is there no press distributor(*) at the ASF? (*) in german: "Presseverteiler" I pretty sure it was not only a

Re: [RELEASE COOKBOOK] Adding and structuring the content

2016-10-15 Thread Marcus
Am 10/15/2016 10:44 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 10/15/2016 1:43 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/14/2016 12:11 AM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Marcus wrote: Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release You just

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-15 Thread Marcus
Am 10/14/2016 09:01 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Keith N. McKenna wrote: Pedro wrote: Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" I have added the your comment to the cwiki document. The change to the update script is usually done several days after the formal Release

Re: [RELEASE COOKBOOK] Adding and structuring the content

2016-10-15 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 10/15/2016 1:43 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/14/2016 12:11 AM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Marcus wrote: Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release You just need to add some text. Don't care about formatting or

Re: This can not be true

2016-10-15 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > I have started a Wiki page on "How to Cook a Release", > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Co > ok+a+Release, > so that we will know everything that needs to be done and how > to do it. > That should reduce the risk

Re: [RELEASE COOKBOOK] Adding and structuring the content

2016-10-15 Thread Jörg Schmidt
I can see that the English press release is to be published in the blog. questions: -- 1. Is it really only published there? Is there no press distributor(*) at the ASF? (*) in german: "Presseverteiler" 2. Where will the translated press releases be published? Imho: in the wiki and

Congratulations for all efforts of the past! Note from a user

2016-10-15 Thread fziegler
Hi, I was encouraged to leave my aoo forum post directly in the dev mailing list so that you all can read what I wanted to express. I am not a software developper in any sense--only a user.   Dear developers, there may be little positive feedback for your work, I guess. So I created an account

Re: 4.1.4_release_blocker requested: [Issue 127147] RAT scan reports some files (automatically created at build time) that need to be added to exclude list

2016-10-15 Thread Marcus
Am 09/29/2016 08:01 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 09/29/2016 08:00 PM, schrieb bugzi...@apache.org: Marcus has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker: Issue 127147: RAT scan reports some files (automatically created at build time) that need to be added to exclude list

Re: Congratulations for all efforts of the past! Note from a user

2016-10-15 Thread Marcus
Am 10/15/2016 02:56 PM, schrieb fzieg...@freenet.de: I was encouraged to leave my aoo forum post directly in the dev mailing list so that you all can read what I wanted to express. I am not a software developper in any sense--only a user. Dear developers, there may be little positive

Re: Back to the Project

2016-10-15 Thread Guy Waterval
Hi Raphael, Happy to see you again here. Regards -- gw 2016-10-16 3:17 GMT+02:00 Raphael Bircher : > Hi there > > I'm honest, I'm a bit surprised by this project. Some weeks there was > rumors, that the project is dead, and some weeks later you put out the new >

Back to the Project

2016-10-15 Thread Raphael Bircher
Hi there I'm honest, I'm a bit surprised by this project. Some weeks there was rumors, that the project is dead, and some weeks later you put out the new version. I know exactly what it takes to release a new version of AOO. So congratulation to you guys. Well, i have not so much time as in

Re: [How to Cook a Release]

2016-10-15 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Marcus wrote: https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice I've updated the data and also published the webpage but the project's webpage [2] is still showing the 4.1.2 data. Does it take some hours to show the new data? Yes, most data on the "projects" subsite are only updated on cron

Re: openoffice programming

2016-10-15 Thread Alex Suk
Damjan Jovanovic wrote > But even at a rate of rewriting 1000 lines per day in Java, it would take > 1 days, which is about 28 man years, to rewrite OpenOffice's 10 > million > lines of code... I am no programmer but this is very interesting! Do 10M lines in C++ convert to 10M lines in Java?

Re: [How to Cook a Release]

2016-10-15 Thread Marcus
Am 10/15/2016 08:28 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice I've updated the data and also published the webpage but the project's webpage [2] is still showing the 4.1.2 data. Does it take some hours to show the new data? Yes, most data

Re: openoffice programming

2016-10-15 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
On 10/15/2016 10:17 AM, Alex Suk wrote: Damjan Jovanovic wrote But even at a rate of rewriting 1000 lines per day in Java, it would take 1 days, which is about 28 man years, to rewrite OpenOffice's 10 million lines of code... Do 10M lines in C++ convert to 10M lines in Java? Is it a 1:1

Re: openoffice programming

2016-10-15 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Alex Suk wrote: > Damjan Jovanovic wrote > > But even at a rate of rewriting 1000 lines per day in Java, it would take > > 1 days, which is about 28 man years, to rewrite OpenOffice's 10 > > million > > lines of code... > > I am no

Re: openoffice programming

2016-10-15 Thread Simon P. Lucy
If you seriously want to redevelop OO then you need to rearchitect and replace in an incremental fashion. Don't try and convert code or even translate, instead concentrate on the features and replace using a micro architecture. S On 14 Oct 2016 12:48, wrote: > I have

Re: 4.1.4_release_blocker requested: [Issue 127147] RAT scan reports some files (automatically created at build time) that need to be added to exclude list

2016-10-15 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Marcus wrote: Of course I would to the fix first in trunk and locally before committing to the new AOO414 branch. Just to be clear on what is expected in general: bugs are normally fixed in trunk (and, if a discussion is needed on whether they should be fixed -not this case- it happens on