[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #110: Issue #128416 - Fixing failure due to moving absent file

2020-12-06 Thread GitBox
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #110: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/110#issuecomment-739506019 Yes, but patches are normally committed top->down. So first in trunk and then in the branches... And there is no branch for a release yet, AOO42X is still for

Re: Review of PR 109

2020-12-06 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 06.12.20 um 15:11 schrieb Mechtilde: > Hello Arrigo, > > thanks for your reply. as I mentioned, I have no machine to build the > patch with gcc >= 7 and a Java version 8.x > > So I need help to fix the java problem before I can revies the fix > > Maybe another person on another system can

Re: Review of PR 109

2020-12-06 Thread Mechtilde
Hello, No because I had enough trouble to remove the old epm version completely. I t takes three builds to be successful. I don't want to have the same problem with a defect Java installation. Kind regards Mechtilde Am 06.12.20 um 15:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Am 06.12.20 um 15:11 schrieb

Review of PR 109

2020-12-06 Thread Mechtilde
Hello, i was asked to text the PR 109 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/109 I tried to do it under Debian 10. gcc 8.3 java 11 I didn't have a running system wizh gcc >=7 and Java 8 I get this error message compile-bj:

Re: Review of PR 109

2020-12-06 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Hello, I am replying as I proposed PR #109. thank you Mechtilde for your review. On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 01:57:50PM +0100, Mechtilde wrote: > Hello, > > i was asked to text the PR 109 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/109 > > I tried to do it under Debian 10. > > gcc 8.3 > java 11 >

[GitHub] [openoffice] NordMike commented on pull request #110: Issue #128416 - Fixing failure due to moving absent file

2020-12-06 Thread GitBox
NordMike commented on pull request #110: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/110#issuecomment-739493620 It's for AOO42X because I'm trying to build upcoming release. This is an automated message from the Apache

Re: Review of PR 109

2020-12-06 Thread Mechtilde
Hello Arrigo, thanks for your reply. as I mentioned, I have no machine to build the patch with gcc >= 7 and a Java version 8.x So I need help to fix the java problem before I can revies the fix Maybe another person on another system can review it. For me it isn't an opinion to create a further

Re: Review of PR 109

2020-12-06 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi, Am 06.12.20 um 15:43 schrieb Mechtilde: > Hello, > > No because I had enough trouble to remove the old epm version > completely. I t takes three builds to be successful. Why?! > > I don't want to have the same problem with a defect Java installation. AdoptOpenJDK is not defect... Matthias

Re: Request of support for open office calc

2020-12-06 Thread Bidouille
You have two mailing lists in italian: https://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.html - Mail original - > De: "Eliodoro MIRANDA" > À: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Envoyé: Samedi 5 Décembre 2020 20:03:27 > Objet: Request of support for open office calc > > I am studyng now CALC but i need

Re: Request of support for open office calc

2020-12-06 Thread Dick Groskamp
On 2020/12/05 19:03:27, Eliodoro MIRANDA wrote: > I am studyng now CALC but i need support. > I have been searching in the web but I dont get the solution. > I have found a forum also in italian but I don't succeed to register in it. > Can you advise me.if there is a contact I can reach in

Re: Java 1.6

2020-12-06 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 06.12.20 um 16:15 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > >> On Dec 5, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: >> >> On 2020-12-05 2:20 p.m., Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> The requirement for Java6 is fast becoming a major hurdle... does anyone >>> have the history and background on why we *require* that?

Re: Java 1.6

2020-12-06 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi, Am 06.12.20 um 16:19 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Jim, > > Am 06.12.20 um 16:15 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> On Dec 5, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: >>> >>> On 2020-12-05 2:20 p.m., Jim Jagielski wrote: The requirement for Java6 is fast becoming a major hurdle... does anyone

Re: Java 1.6

2020-12-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Dec 5, 2020, at 6:05 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > > On 2020-12-05 2:20 p.m., Jim Jagielski wrote: >> The requirement for Java6 is fast becoming a major hurdle... does anyone >> have the history and background on why we *require* that? > > Due to a bug in Java, Java7 & Java8 would not work

Re: Configure missing gtk-plugin

2020-12-06 Thread Don Lewis
On 7 Dec, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > I haave an issue with configuring I am unfammiliar with. > > configure: error: requirements to build the gtk-plugin not met. Use > --disable-gtk or install the missing packages > > What does this mean? I did not find this in any package. >

Re: Configure missing gtk-plugin

2020-12-06 Thread Peter Kovacs
On 07.12.20 08:04, Don Lewis wrote: On 7 Dec, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello all, I haave an issue with configuring I am unfammiliar with. configure: error: requirements to build the gtk-plugin not met. Use --disable-gtk or install the missing packages What does this mean? I did not

Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)

2020-12-06 Thread Mechtilde
Hello, Con someone give me a hint where and how can I change the source option and the target option for the Java version. Kind regards Mechtilde Am 06.12.20 um 13:57 schrieb Mechtilde: > Hello, > > i was asked to text the PR 109 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/109 > > I tried to

Re: How to cope with Python module putting .so files into lib64 instead of lib?

2020-12-06 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Dear List, I think I am close to a possible solution to this problem, that I will propose as a pull request on GitHub once it will be ready. I would like to make sure that Python and the pyuno modules are built correctly and that they work as expected in my test builds. Can someone please

Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)

2020-12-06 Thread Peter Kovacs
Hi Mechtilde, check main/saxton/saxton-9.0.0.7-bj.patch line 147 and 148 +    +    all the best Peter On 07.12.20 07:48, Mechtilde wrote: Hello, Con someone give me a hint where and how can I change the source option and the target option for the Java version. Kind regards Mechtilde

Re: How to cope with Python module putting .so files into lib64 instead of lib?

2020-12-06 Thread Peter Kovacs
I think we can only try to build and install on many distributions. If it is only a folder change I think it should be save. At least Arch /usr/lib is only a softlink to /usr/lib64 On 07.12.20 08:30, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: Dear List, I think I am close to a possible solution to this

Configure missing gtk-plugin

2020-12-06 Thread Peter Kovacs
Hello all, I haave an issue with configuring I am unfammiliar with. configure: error: requirements to build the gtk-plugin not met. Use --disable-gtk or install the missing packages What does this mean? I did not find this in any package. I installed gtk2 and gst-plugin-gtk (which are