Re: Project Planning page on cwiki

On 24.10.21 16:13, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: Dear dev@, Hi! this may have been raised many other times... but why do we keep publishing release notes under the "Project Planning" cwiki page [1] when that page starts with a big warning that is only for the incubation phase? :-) I think there are

QA automatisation in AOO

Hello all, In the discussion on API, and releases Jörg has ask about how we could improve QA. The only way in general is to formalize. We need to define testcases and automate those. There are 2 ways of Automation: 1) is through Code 2) is through GUI. Today both can be automated. @1)

Re: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API]

Hi Jörg, Check: Version Number Assignment (Apache OpenOffice internal) Structure .. Explanation : huge release with visible changes and new features including incompatible API changes if necessary. Translation updates are most often necessary to address the UI visible

Project Planning page on cwiki

Dear dev@, this may have been raised many other times... but why do we keep publishing release notes under the "Project Planning" cwiki page [1] when that page starts with a big warning that is only for the incubation phase? :-) My humble suggestion, given the fact that the section contains

Re: Compatibility of new releases with older operating systems

Dear Dave, All, thank you for all the replies to this thread. On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 03:58:32PM -0700, Dave Fisher wrote: > We have these pages: > https://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo40.html [...] I understand there are plenty of "minimum system requirements" scattered

RE: QA automatisation in AOO

Hello, > -Original Message- > From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:32 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: QA automatisation in AOO > > Hello all, > > In the discussion on API, and releases Jörg has ask about how > we could >

Re: QA automatisation in AOO

Hi! On 24.10.21 21:27, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote: Hi, I am developing an infra for QA. Initially aimed for accessibility, I think the whole community can use this: they are based on Dogtail and track events from at-spi, on Linux, that enables to see if a key press or a mouse mouvement has

RE: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API]

> -Original Message- > From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:19 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment > object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API] > > Hi Jörg, > > Check: > > >

Re: QA automatisation in AOO

Hi Peter and All, On 10/24/21 2:47 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hi, On 24.10.21 20:39, Jörg Schmidt wrote: Hello, -Original Message- From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:32 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: QA automatisation in AOO Hello

Re: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API]

On 24.10.21 20:57, Jörg Schmidt wrote: -Original Message- From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:19 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API] Hi

Re: QA automatisation in AOO

Hi, I am developing an infra for QA. Initially aimed for accessibility, I think the whole community can use this: they are based on Dogtail and track events from at-spi, on Linux, that enables to see if a key press or a mouse mouvement has the appropriate feedback from an event point of

Re: QA automatisation in AOO

Hi, On 24.10.21 20:39, Jörg Schmidt wrote: Hello, -Original Message- From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:32 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: QA automatisation in AOO Hello all, In the discussion on API, and releases Jörg has ask