Does OpenOffice still use Serf?

2018-11-13 Thread Branko Čibej
Hi all, I'm writing here because I believe OpenOffice uses Serf as its HTTP client; at least I did find version 1.2.1 mentioned in the patch files in ext_libraries/serf. I would like to ask for help from the OpenOffice developers to test the next release of Serf. We — the Apache Serf project —

Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?

2018-11-13 Thread Branko Čibej
On 13.11.2018 22:23, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> I think it would be a good idea to upgrade Serf in our builds. >> What about the others (real developers)? ;-) > > Years ago, we had to avoid upgrading Serf in 4.1.x as Serf had started > to require SCons for the build and we

Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?

2018-11-15 Thread Branko Čibej
On 15.11.2018 20:28, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Am 13.11.18 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino: >>> On November 13, 2018 at 10:08 PM Andrea Pescetti >>> wrote: >>> 2. All WebDAV operations. You can find somewhere in Bugzilla a patch >>> that didn't make it to 4.1.2 due to excessive

Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?

2018-11-14 Thread Branko Čibej
On 14.11.2018 08:16, Peter kovacs wrote: > How about trying to open an URL as a test case? > > Is serf moving away from SCONs? I surely hope so. > I ask since we want to move to SCONs. An experience exchange would be great. Well ... SCons looks amazingly good in tiny examples, but when it comes

Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?

2018-11-13 Thread Branko Čibej
On 13.11.2018 21:49, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Branko, Hi all, > > Am 13.11.18 um 12:39 schrieb Branko Čibej: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm writing here because I believe OpenOffice uses Serf as its HTTP >> client; at least I did find version 1.2.1 mentioned in the pat

Re: Check for Updates broken?

2018-11-18 Thread Branko Čibej
On 18.11.2018 17:19, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Pedro Lino wrote: >> However the AOO site does not specify any charset. Could that be the >> problem? > > I don't think the charset is a major issue, but indeed (if I do the > same test with openssl) there is something interesting that can > probably

Re: Check for Updates broken?

2018-11-18 Thread Branko Čibej
On 18.11.2018 18:41, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 18.11.2018 17:19, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Pedro Lino wrote: >>> However the AOO site does not specify any charset. Could that be the >>> problem? >> I don't think the charset is a major issue, but indeed (if I

Re: Check for Updates broken?

2018-11-16 Thread Branko Čibej
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, 17:02 Andrea Pescetti Pedro Lino wrote: > >> On November 16, 2018 at 11:54 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> $ curl https://ooo-updates.apache.org/aoo416/check.Update > > > > > > > > http://installation.openoffice.org/description;> > > > > The network diagnostics are

Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?

2018-12-11 Thread Branko Čibej
On 15.11.2018 21:17, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 15.11.2018 20:28, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Pedro, >> >> Am 13.11.18 um 23:20 schrieb Pedro Lino: >>>> On November 13, 2018 at 10:08 PM Andrea Pescetti >>>> wrote: >>>> 2. All WebD

Re: Check for Updates broken?

2018-11-19 Thread Branko Čibej
On 19.11.2018 18:17, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Pedro Lino wrote:>> On November 19, 2018 at 12:52 AM Branko Čibej wrote: >>> It looks like you found the real problem: >>> $ curl -sviI --tlsv1.0 https://ooo-updates.apache.org/ > > This makes sense, but I stil

Re: Check for Updates broken?

2018-11-19 Thread Branko Čibej
On 19.11.2018 10:11, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Brane, all > >> On November 19, 2018 at 12:52 AM Branko Čibej wrote: >>> Does the Apache web server still support TLS version 1.0? The old >>> version of OpenSSL that we bundle with the Windows and Linux versions >>&

Re: Check for Updates broken?

2018-11-17 Thread Branko Čibej
On 17.11.2018 18:32, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Dave Fisher wrote: >> I’ve been on with Infra on HipChat and both servers are the same with >> the same content internally, > > Yes, I don't see this as a major issue either. It is probably too > early for Infra to jump in, since we haven't identified

Re: Check for Updates broken?

2018-11-18 Thread Branko Čibej
On 18.11.2018 23:30, Don Lewis wrote: > On 17 Nov, Pedro Lino wrote: >>> On November 17, 2018 at 5:32 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> A nice additional benefit is that this gives us a simple way to >>> reproduce the bug, equivalent to the update notification. >>> >>> $ soffice

Re: [discussion] svn migration plan

2019-07-20 Thread Branko Čibej
Hi AOO devs, I just stumbled onto this thread. Coming from subversion.a.o, I'm saddened to see you've decided to switch to Git. Could someone please summarise the reasons for this decision, or give me a link to the discussion in the mail archives? I'd very much like to know if it was caused by

Re: [discussion] svn migration plan

2019-07-20 Thread Branko Čibej
reading OpenOffice svn repo. So I can't even > use git as a client. > I assume you mean git-svn? I'm not surprised. Thanks for taking the time to respond. Looks like nothing short of making svn just another git would make you change your mind. :) -- Brane > > All the best. > Peter

Re: [discussion] svn migration plan

2019-07-21 Thread Branko Čibej
On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, 07:25 Mechtilde, wrote: > Hello Branko, > > Am 21.07.19 um 02:01 schrieb Branko Čibej: > > On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, 01:42 Peter Kovacs, wrote: > > > >> Hi brane, > >> > >> The threads are linked in my first po

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

2019-07-26 Thread Branko Čibej
On 25.07.2019 00:43, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > > I would like to ask if I or any other from OpenOffice Development team > can port the patch from LibreOffice to OpenOffice to fix this Issue > under the APL2 License, so the Issue can be fixed in OpenOffice without > more work then

Re: C++ standard when building OpenOffice

2019-11-03 Thread Branko Čibej
On 04.11.2019 02:14, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Thank you for the info. I haven't had good experiences with Boost in my > Win64 attempts either... > > Don, how feasible do you think Go or Rust are, to start using in place of > C++? Really? You'd rewrite code in a completely different language

Re: what is this supposed to do?

2019-11-06 Thread Branko Čibej
On 05.11.2019 20:20, Peter Kovacs wrote: > I am not sure why, but if you use gcc++98 std it compiles. Maybe it > optimizes the code since it might be dead code. That would be a very, very strange way to go about things. To figure out something is dead code, you have to at *least* parse it first,

Re: Para-site

2019-11-07 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.11.2019 16:29, Bidouille wrote: > Domain name: openoficextrem.com > Registry Domain ID: 1966381298_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN > Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com > Registrar URL: http://www.namecheap.com > Updated Date: 2019-09-09T10:26:10.34Z > Creation Date: 2015-10-06T10:53:42.00Z >

Re: what is this supposed to do?

2019-11-05 Thread Branko Čibej
On 05.11.2019 19:54, Don Lewis wrote: > I don't understand what this strange little bit of code (line 611 of > basebmp/inc/basebmp/packedpixeliterator.hxx) is supposed to do: > > value_type get(difference_type const & d) const > { > const int remainder( x(d.x) %

Re: [DISCUSSION] Build environment future

2019-10-30 Thread Branko Čibej
On 30.10.2019 06:25, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello Damjan and all > > > I would like to re-discuss our current plan. Hoping to gain a common view. > > Current state is mostly we use gmake, there are still some difficult to > migrate dmake projects. And we use Ant for java. > > The plan is not to

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

2019-10-31 Thread Branko Čibej
On 31.10.2019 19:49, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Located at > > https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO418-macOS-test/ > > Are some test macOS dmgs that should be correctly signed and notarized such > that they do not trigger Gatekeeper; that is, they should result in AOO > opening on macOS

Re: what is this supposed to do?

2019-11-06 Thread Branko Čibej
On 06.11.2019 18:06, Don Lewis wrote: > On 6 Nov, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 05.11.2019 20:20, Peter Kovacs wrote: >>> I am not sure why, but if you use gcc++98 std it compiles. Maybe it >>> optimizes the code since it might be dead code. >> That would be a v

Re: C++ standard when building OpenOffice

2019-11-03 Thread Branko Čibej
On 04.11.2019 05:15, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Yeah, it has compiler bugs, undocumented linker issues, crashes when built > with Clang due to lack of -fno-enforce-eh-specs support, crash-on-startup > on some Windows installations, porting to new platforms is hard, there are > incompatibilities

Re: volunteer activity tracking

2019-11-21 Thread Branko Čibej
On 21.11.2019 13:35, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Hello, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Hagar Delest [mailto:delest.ha...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 7:29 PM >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: volunteer activity tracking >> >> Le 20/11/2019 à 09:33, Jörg

Re: volunteer activity tracking

2019-11-21 Thread Branko Čibej
On 21.11.2019 14:42, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > >> -Original Message----- >> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@apache.org] >> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 2:16 PM >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: volunteer activity tracking > &

Re: Mac system Catalina

2019-10-28 Thread Branko Čibej
On 28.10.2019 07:40, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hi Helen, > > AFAIK the current version 4.1.7 should work, as all other versions did work > before. > Can you describe your issue in more detail? Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper notarization, apps won't work on

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

2019-11-01 Thread Branko Čibej
uirement (has been for years, really) and, IMNSHO, it should be Infra that provides the required services to do so, for builds created on our infrastructure, not Joe "Random" Developer. -- Brane >> On Nov 1, 2019, at 6:40 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >>

Re: volunteer activity tracking

2019-11-24 Thread Branko Čibej
On 24.11.2019 13:19, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] >> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2019 11:28 AM >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: volunteer activity tracking >> >> >> On 24.11.19 09:30, Jörg Schmidt wrote:

Re: FOSDEM 2020

2019-09-22 Thread Branko Čibej
If it's not too late and if you don't mind, I'd like to fix grammar and semantics here: On 19.09.2019 13:33, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Small corrections inside: > > Am 17.09.19 um 09:57 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: >> Hello, >> >> we are planning to join next FOSDEM like we did in

Re: upgrading OpenSSL

2019-10-08 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.10.2019 01:23, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Serf is dropping scon, Nope, we're just adding a CMake build. Scons is still supported. > and with 4.0 supportung cmake, too. Not that it changes a lot. It actually does, the CMake build also properly supports latest CMake-enabled APR and APR-Util