On 17.07.2015 14:00, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:06 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
I thought ODF 1.2 was relative old, but I might be wrong.
While it was approved as an OASIS standard in 2011, it only became an
official and approved ISO standard in mid-June. More at
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:06 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
I thought ODF 1.2 was relative old, but I might be wrong.
While it was approved as an OASIS standard in 2011, it only became an
official and approved ISO standard in mid-June. More at
[in
my case all is in my spare time], therefore the progress is very slow.
ODF 1.2 is the native format for documents generated by AOO, but there
exists still some elements in ODF 1.2, which AOO does not support.
ODF 1.2 is an implementer driven standard. You should not think
is the native format for documents generated by AOO, but there
exists still some elements in ODF 1.2, which AOO does not support.
ODF 1.2 is an implementer driven standard. You should not think, that
there is a group of people, who invents the standard, and then
application developers
Hi
Can someone please help me understand the implications of this:
https://blog.documentfoundation.org/2015/07/17/open-document-format-odf-1-2-published-as-international-standard-263002015-by-isoiec/
Do we also support ODF 1.2 ?
if yes, then we should also tell it, if not what are the
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 6:06 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
Can someone please help me understand the implications of this:
https://blog.documentfoundation.org/2015/07/17/open-document-format-odf-1-2-published-as-international-standard-263002015-by-isoiec/
Do we also support ODF 1.2 ?