Re: ODF 1.2 and AOO ?

2015-07-17 Thread RA Stehmann
On 17.07.2015 14:00, Simon Phipps wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:06 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: I thought ODF 1.2 was relative old, but I might be wrong. While it was approved as an OASIS standard in 2011, it only became an official and approved ISO standard in mid-June. More at

Re: ODF 1.2 and AOO ?

2015-07-17 Thread Simon Phipps
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:06 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: I thought ODF 1.2 was relative old, but I might be wrong. While it was approved as an OASIS standard in 2011, it only became an official and approved ISO standard in mid-June. More at

Re: ODF 1.2 and AOO ?

2015-07-17 Thread jan i
[in my case all is in my spare time], therefore the progress is very slow. ODF 1.2 is the native format for documents generated by AOO, but there exists still some elements in ODF 1.2, which AOO does not support. ODF 1.2 is an implementer driven standard. You should not think

Re: ODF 1.2 and AOO ?

2015-07-17 Thread Regina Henschel
is the native format for documents generated by AOO, but there exists still some elements in ODF 1.2, which AOO does not support. ODF 1.2 is an implementer driven standard. You should not think, that there is a group of people, who invents the standard, and then application developers

ODF 1.2 and AOO ?

2015-07-17 Thread jan i
Hi Can someone please help me understand the implications of this: https://blog.documentfoundation.org/2015/07/17/open-document-format-odf-1-2-published-as-international-standard-263002015-by-isoiec/ Do we also support ODF 1.2 ? if yes, then we should also tell it, if not what are the

Re: ODF 1.2 and AOO ?

2015-07-17 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 6:06 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: Hi Can someone please help me understand the implications of this: https://blog.documentfoundation.org/2015/07/17/open-document-format-odf-1-2-published-as-international-standard-263002015-by-isoiec/ Do we also support ODF 1.2 ?