Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-07-08 Thread Roberto Galoppini 
Marcus I need your SourceForge account to provide you with admin
priviliges, I couldn't find any account associated with your email address.

Roberto


2013/7/5 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de

 Am 06/28/2013 10:35 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

  Am 06/28/2013 03:56 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:

 2013/6/28 Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org

  On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
 wrote:

 Am 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:

  2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:


 Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:



 2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:

  Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge

 mirror

 to
 do
 some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:



 http://sourceforge.net/**projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.**
 0/binaries/http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/

 LANG/file_name


 You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the

 mirror:


 http://people.apache.org/~**marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/.http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/.
 ..




 You can do that in few ways:

 - you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it,
 that
 would be fine;

 - you can create a new folder and mark it as staged in which it is
 all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible
 during
 normal file browsing;

 - you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error
 messages.




 great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
 weekend.



 Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
 staged directory method are that:

 (1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
 marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
 and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
 admin, deletion, etc.).

 For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
 you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
 you.



 OK, sounds really better. However, I seem to fail to create a new

 directory.

 I got an account on SourceForge now but I don't see any new options. Or

 am I

 on a wrong way?



  I guess you've not been put among projects' admin. Please send me your
 SourceForge account and I'll do rightaway.


 OK, done by PM.


 When you can help me for the weekend, then I try something.

 Thanks




  BTW:
 Have you already noticed that we will change the directory structure
 with
 AOO 4?

 So, the old ones, e.g.:


  http://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**
 files/localized/de/3.4.1/http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/


 and

 http://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**
 files/stable/3.4.1/http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/


 will be cancelled and the following structure will become valid to keep

 it

 simple and reduced complexity:


 .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
 .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
 .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/



 Yea, and I guess the staged approach would be good especially for this
 reason.


 OK

  I assume the old 3.4.1/3.4.0 files will remain unchanged? Or is the
 plan to adapt them to the new directory scheme?


 At least up now, old installation files were simply moved into the
 archive.

  My suggestion is to leave them as they are, here's why.

 The stats are tied to the path and filename, so if you move them, the
 per-file/per-folder stats won't be available anymore. Note that the stats
 from the old locations are still counted in aggregate totals though. So,
 their total download count shouldn't change.


 Marcus



  PS:
 Is it right that the URL still needs a /download at its end to

 start

 the
 download?






 The /download should be there at the end of the URL. If it's not, it
 still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
 it to the URL.




 OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download
 URL.

 Thanks


 Marcus



  Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

  I've updated the test area in staging:

 http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**index.htmlhttp://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

 To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US,
 en-GB,
 de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see
 errors it
 might be just a missing language. ;-)
 And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.

 For the first troubleshooting the following could help:

 http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**analyze.htmlhttp://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html

 Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.

 Thanks in advance.

 Marcus



 Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):




 I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download

 scripting

 to
 apply with the new situation (incubating string is gone, new

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-07-08 Thread Marcus (OOo) 

Am 07/08/2013 04:17 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:

Marcus I need your SourceForge account to provide you with admin
priviliges, I couldn't find any account associated with your email address.


sent again via PM.

Thanks for your help.

Marcus




2013/7/5 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de


Am 06/28/2013 10:35 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

  Am 06/28/2013 03:56 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:



2013/6/28 Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org

  On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de

wrote:


Am 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:

  2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:




Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:




2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:

  Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge



mirror



to

do
some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:



http://sourceforge.net/**projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.**
0/binaries/http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/


LANG/file_name





You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the


mirror:





http://people.apache.org/~**marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/.http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/.
..





You can do that in few ways:

- you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it,
that
would be fine;

- you can create a new folder and mark it as staged in which it is
all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible
during
normal file browsing;

- you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error
messages.





great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
weekend.




Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
staged directory method are that:

(1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
admin, deletion, etc.).

For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
you.




OK, sounds really better. However, I seem to fail to create a new


directory.


I got an account on SourceForge now but I don't see any new options. Or


am I


on a wrong way?




  I guess you've not been put among projects' admin. Please send me your

SourceForge account and I'll do rightaway.



OK, done by PM.



When you can help me for the weekend, then I try something.

Thanks




  BTW:

Have you already noticed that we will change the directory structure
with
AOO 4?

So, the old ones, e.g.:


  http://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**

files/localized/de/3.4.1/http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/



and

http://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**
files/stable/3.4.1/http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/


will be cancelled and the following structure will become valid to keep


it


simple and reduced complexity:


.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/





Yea, and I guess the staged approach would be good especially for this
reason.



OK

  I assume the old 3.4.1/3.4.0 files will remain unchanged? Or is the

plan to adapt them to the new directory scheme?




At least up now, old installation files were simply moved into the
archive.

  My suggestion is to leave them as they are, here's why.


The stats are tied to the path and filename, so if you move them, the
per-file/per-folder stats won't be available anymore. Note that the stats
from the old locations are still counted in aggregate totals though. So,
their total download count shouldn't change.



Marcus



  PS:

Is it right that the URL still needs a /download at its end to


start



the

download?







The /download should be there at the end of the URL. If it's not, it
still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
it to the URL.





OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download
URL.

Thanks


Marcus



  Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):


  I've updated the test area in staging:


http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**index.htmlhttp://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US,
en-GB,
de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see
errors it
might be just a missing language. ;-)
And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.

For the first troubleshooting the following could help:

http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**analyze.htmlhttp://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html

Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus



Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):





I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download


scripting



to

apply

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-07-04 Thread Marcus (OOo) 

Am 06/28/2013 10:35 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

Am 06/28/2013 03:56 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:

2013/6/28 Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org


On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:

Am 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:


2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:


Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:



2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:


Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge

mirror

to
do
some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:



http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/

LANG/file_name


You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the

mirror:


http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...




You can do that in few ways:

- you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it,
that
would be fine;

- you can create a new folder and mark it as staged in which it is
all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible
during
normal file browsing;

- you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error
messages.




great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
weekend.



Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
staged directory method are that:

(1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
admin, deletion, etc.).

For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
you.



OK, sounds really better. However, I seem to fail to create a new

directory.

I got an account on SourceForge now but I don't see any new options. Or

am I

on a wrong way?




I guess you've not been put among projects' admin. Please send me your
SourceForge account and I'll do rightaway.


OK, done by PM.


When you can help me for the weekend, then I try something.

Thanks




BTW:
Have you already noticed that we will change the directory structure
with
AOO 4?

So, the old ones, e.g.:



http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/



and

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/


will be cancelled and the following structure will become valid to keep

it

simple and reduced complexity:


.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/




Yea, and I guess the staged approach would be good especially for this
reason.


OK


I assume the old 3.4.1/3.4.0 files will remain unchanged? Or is the
plan to adapt them to the new directory scheme?


At least up now, old installation files were simply moved into the archive.


My suggestion is to leave them as they are, here's why.

The stats are tied to the path and filename, so if you move them, the
per-file/per-folder stats won't be available anymore. Note that the stats
from the old locations are still counted in aggregate totals though. So,
their total download count shouldn't change.


Marcus




PS:
Is it right that the URL still needs a /download at its end to

start

the
download?






The /download should be there at the end of the URL. If it's not, it
still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
it to the URL.




OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download
URL.

Thanks


Marcus




Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):


I've updated the test area in staging:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US,
en-GB,
de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see
errors it
might be just a missing language. ;-)
And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.

For the first troubleshooting the following could help:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html

Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus



Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):




I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download

scripting

to
apply with the new situation (incubating string is gone, new
version,
new directory + filename structure).

If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should
do it
fast
as the time is running.



1. I'm working with the following directory structure:

.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/



2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
(especially @Juergen + Ariel)

aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-28 Thread Roberto Galoppini 
2013/6/28 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org

 On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
 wrote:
  Am 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
 
  2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
 
  Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
 
 
  2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
 
  Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge
 mirror
  to
  do
  some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:
 
 
 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/
 LANG/file_name
 
  You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the
 mirror:
 
  http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...
 
 
 
  You can do that in few ways:
 
  - you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it, that
  would be fine;
 
  - you can create a new folder and mark it as staged in which it is
  all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible during
  normal file browsing;
 
  - you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error
  messages.
 
 
 
  great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
  weekend.
 
 
  Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
  staged directory method are that:
 
  (1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
  marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
  and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
  admin, deletion, etc.).
 
  For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
  you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
  you.
 
 
  OK, sounds really better. However, I seem to fail to create a new
 directory.
  I got an account on SourceForge now but I don't see any new options. Or
 am I
  on a wrong way?


I guess you've not been put among projects' admin. Please send me your
SourceForge account and I'll do rightaway.


  
 
  BTW:
  Have you already noticed that we will change the directory structure with
  AOO 4?
 
  So, the old ones, e.g.:
 
 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/
 
  and
 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/
 
  will be cancelled and the following structure will become valid to keep
 it
  simple and reduced complexity:
 
 
  .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
  .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
  .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/


Yea, and I guess the staged approach would be good especially for this
reason.




 I assume the old 3.4.1/3.4.0 files will remain unchanged?  Or is the
 plan to adapt them to the new directory scheme?


My suggestion is to leave them as they are, here's why.

The stats are tied to the path and filename, so if you move them, the
per-file/per-folder stats won't be available anymore. Note that the stats
from the old locations are still counted in aggregate totals though. So,
their total download count shouldn't change.

Roberto



 -Rob


  Marcus
 
 
 
 
  PS:
  Is it right that the URL still needs a /download at its end to
 start
  the
  download?
 
 
 
 
 
  The /download should be there at the end of the URL.  If it's not, it
  still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
  it to the URL.
 
 
 
  OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download URL.
 
  Thanks
 
 
  Marcus
 
 
 
  Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
 
  I've updated the test area in staging:
 
  http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html
 
  To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US,
  en-GB,
  de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
  might be just a missing language. ;-)
  And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
 
  For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
 
  http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html
 
  Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
  Marcus
 
 
 
  Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
 
 
 
  I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download
 scripting
  to
  apply with the new situation (incubating string is gone, new
  version,
  new directory + filename structure).
 
  If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it
  fast
  as the time is running.
 
 
 
  1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
 
  .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
  .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
  .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
 
 
 
  2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
  (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
 
  aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
 
  Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
 
  Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
  Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
  Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
  Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-27 Thread Marcus (OOo) 

Am 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:

2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:

Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:


2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:


Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror to
do
some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:


http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/file_name

You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror:

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...



You can do that in few ways:

- you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it, that
would be fine;

- you can create a new folder and mark it as staged in which it is
all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible during
normal file browsing;

- you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error messages.



great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
weekend.


Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
staged directory method are that:

(1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
admin, deletion, etc.).

For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
you.


OK, sounds really better. However, I seem to fail to create a new 
directory. I got an account on SourceForge now but I don't see any new 
options. Or am I on a wrong way?




BTW:
Have you already noticed that we will change the directory structure 
with AOO 4?


So, the old ones, e.g.:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/

and

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/

will be cancelled and the following structure will become valid to keep 
it simple and reduced complexity:


.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/

Marcus




PS:
Is it right that the URL still needs a /download at its end to start
the
download?





The /download should be there at the end of the URL.  If it's not, it
still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
it to the URL.



OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download URL.

Thanks


Marcus




Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):


I've updated the test area in staging:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB,
de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
might be just a missing language. ;-)
And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.

For the first troubleshooting the following could help:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html

Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus



Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):



I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting
to
apply with the new situation (incubating string is gone, new version,
new directory + filename structure).

If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
as the time is running.



1. I'm working with the following directory structure:

.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/



2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
(especially @Juergen + Ariel)

aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe



3.
I'm testing with my Apache people account:

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...

However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
the following:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download

http://www.apache.org/dist/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5

http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
aoo/
4.0.0/
source/
aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-27 Thread Rob Weir 
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
 Am 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:

 2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:

 Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:


 2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:

 Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror
 to
 do
 some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:



 http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/file_name

 You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror:

 http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...



 You can do that in few ways:

 - you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it, that
 would be fine;

 - you can create a new folder and mark it as staged in which it is
 all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible during
 normal file browsing;

 - you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error
 messages.



 great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
 weekend.


 Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
 staged directory method are that:

 (1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
 marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
 and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
 admin, deletion, etc.).

 For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
 you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
 you.


 OK, sounds really better. However, I seem to fail to create a new directory.
 I got an account on SourceForge now but I don't see any new options. Or am I
 on a wrong way?



 BTW:
 Have you already noticed that we will change the directory structure with
 AOO 4?

 So, the old ones, e.g.:

 http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/

 and

 http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/

 will be cancelled and the following structure will become valid to keep it
 simple and reduced complexity:


 .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
 .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
 .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/


I assume the old 3.4.1/3.4.0 files will remain unchanged?  Or is the
plan to adapt them to the new directory scheme?

-Rob


 Marcus




 PS:
 Is it right that the URL still needs a /download at its end to start
 the
 download?





 The /download should be there at the end of the URL.  If it's not, it
 still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
 it to the URL.



 OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download URL.

 Thanks


 Marcus



 Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

 I've updated the test area in staging:

 http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

 To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US,
 en-GB,
 de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
 might be just a missing language. ;-)
 And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.

 For the first troubleshooting the following could help:

 http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html

 Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.

 Thanks in advance.

 Marcus



 Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):



 I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting
 to
 apply with the new situation (incubating string is gone, new
 version,
 new directory + filename structure).

 If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it
 fast
 as the time is running.



 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:

 .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
 .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
 .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/



 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
 (especially @Juergen + Ariel)

 aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

 Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg

 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe



 3.
 I'm testing with my Apache people account:

 http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...

 However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look
 like
 the following:

 http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
 aoo/
 4.0.0/
 binaries/
 en-US/

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-26 Thread Roberto Galoppini 
2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
 Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:

 2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:

 Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror to
 do
 some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:


 http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/file_name

 You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror:

 http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...


 You can do that in few ways:

 - you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it, that
 would be fine;

 - you can create a new folder and mark it as staged in which it is
 all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible during
 normal file browsing;

 - you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error messages.


 great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
 weekend.

Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
staged directory method are that:

(1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
admin, deletion, etc.).

For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
you.

Roberto




 PS:
 Is it right that the URL still needs a /download at its end to start
 the
 download?




 The /download should be there at the end of the URL.  If it's not, it
 still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
 it to the URL.


 OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download URL.

 Thanks


 Marcus



 Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

 I've updated the test area in staging:

 http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

 To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB,
 de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
 might be just a missing language. ;-)
 And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.

 For the first troubleshooting the following could help:

 http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html

 Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.

 Thanks in advance.

 Marcus



 Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):


 I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting
 to
 apply with the new situation (incubating string is gone, new version,
 new directory + filename structure).

 If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
 as the time is running.



 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:

 .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
 .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
 .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/



 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
 (especially @Juergen + Ariel)

 aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

 Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg

 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe



 3.
 I'm testing with my Apache people account:

 http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...

 However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
 the following:

 http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
 aoo/
 4.0.0/
 binaries/
 en-US/
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download

 http://www.apache.org/dist/
 aoo/
 4.0.0/
 binaries/
 en-US/
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5

 http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
 aoo/
 4.0.0/
 source/
 aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2



 Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-25 Thread Roberto Galoppini 
2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
 Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror to do
 some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:

 http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/file_name

 You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror:

 http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...

You can do that in few ways:

- you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it, that
would be fine;

- you can create a new folder and mark it as staged in which it is
all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible during
normal file browsing;

- you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error messages.



 PS:
 Is it right that the URL still needs a /download at its end to start the
 download?



The /download should be there at the end of the URL.  If it's not, it
still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
it to the URL.

Hope it helps.

Roberto

 Thanks in advance.

 Marcus



 Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

 I've updated the test area in staging:

 http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

 To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB,
 de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
 might be just a missing language. ;-)
 And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.

 For the first troubleshooting the following could help:

 http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html

 Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.

 Thanks in advance.

 Marcus



 Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

 I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to
 apply with the new situation (incubating string is gone, new version,
 new directory + filename structure).

 If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
 as the time is running.



 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:

 .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
 .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
 .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/



 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
 (especially @Juergen + Ariel)

 aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

 Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg

 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe



 3.
 I'm testing with my Apache people account:

 http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...

 However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
 the following:

 http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
 aoo/
 4.0.0/
 binaries/
 en-US/
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download

 http://www.apache.org/dist/
 aoo/
 4.0.0/
 binaries/
 en-US/
 Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5

 http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
 aoo/
 4.0.0/
 source/
 aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2



 Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-25 Thread Marcus (OOo) 

Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:

2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:

Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror to do
some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/file_name

You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror:

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...


You can do that in few ways:

- you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it, that
would be fine;

- you can create a new folder and mark it as staged in which it is
all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible during
normal file browsing;

- you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error messages.


great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming 
weekend.



PS:
Is it right that the URL still needs a /download at its end to start the
download?




The /download should be there at the end of the URL.  If it's not, it
still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
it to the URL.


OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download URL.

Thanks

Marcus




Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):


I've updated the test area in staging:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB,
de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
might be just a missing language. ;-)
And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.

For the first troubleshooting the following could help:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html

Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus



Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):


I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to
apply with the new situation (incubating string is gone, new version,
new directory + filename structure).

If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
as the time is running.



1. I'm working with the following directory structure:

.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/



2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
(especially @Juergen + Ariel)

aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe



3.
I'm testing with my Apache people account:

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...

However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
the following:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download

http://www.apache.org/dist/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5

http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
aoo/
4.0.0/
source/
aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2



Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-09 Thread Andrea Pescetti 

Marcus (OOo) wrote:

Am 06/09/2013 12:18 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

* Release Schedule is actually a Release History, or timeline

Right. Wouldn't it then be better to point to the new schedule?


No, this would mix stable and unstable version information and we are 
already quite paranoid on not linking unstable builds... So I would just 
rename the link to Release History and keep it as it is.



* Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently
consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd
recommend a link Extensions and Dictionaries pointing to
extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links.

Then it's IMHO better to extend the link in the light blue box to speak
about Get Apache OpenOffice Extensions and Dictionaries and delete the
link in the nav sidebar.


Updating the blue box is OK. And for the right sidebar, I don't see a 
risk with duplication, a lot of stuff is already duplicated: we can even 
leave it as it and link Dictionaries to 
http://extensions.openoffice.org ; the important part is to avoid that 
users are driven to a totally outdated page recommending now deprecated 
and obsolete features like DicOOo.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-09 Thread Kay Schenk 
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:

 Am 06/09/2013 11:00 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

  Marcus (OOo) wrote:

 Am 06/09/2013 12:18 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

 * Release Schedule is actually a Release History, or timeline

 Right. Wouldn't it then be better to point to the new schedule?


 No, this would mix stable and unstable version information and we are
 already quite paranoid on not linking unstable builds... So I would just
 rename the link to Release History and keep it as it is.


 The link points to the schedule, not to the wiki for downloading snapshot
 builds. And I don't see any cross link to it.


  * Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently
 consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd
 recommend a link Extensions and Dictionaries pointing to
 extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links.

 Then it's IMHO better to extend the link in the light blue box to speak
 about Get Apache OpenOffice Extensions and Dictionaries and delete the
 link in the nav sidebar.


 Updating the blue box is OK. And for the right sidebar, I don't see a
 risk with duplication, a lot of stuff is already duplicated: we can even
 leave it as it and link Dictionaries to
 http://extensions.openoffice.**org http://extensions.openoffice.org ;


 OK, updated.


  the important part is to avoid that

 users are driven to a totally outdated page recommending now deprecated
 and obsolete features like DicOOo.


 What about the link to the building guide? I've lost the overview where
 the best data is.


The Build Guide link you have seems OK to me.



 Marcus



 --**--**-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-- 

MzK

You can't believe one thing and do another.
 What you believe and what you do are the same thing.
 -- Leonard Peltier

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-08 Thread Marcus (OOo) 

I've updated the test area in staging:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB, 
de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it 
might be just a missing language. ;-)

And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.

For the first troubleshooting the following could help:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html

Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus



Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to
apply with the new situation (incubating string is gone, new version,
new directory + filename structure).

If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
as the time is running.



1. I'm working with the following directory structure:

.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/



2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
(especially @Juergen + Ariel)

aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe



3.
I'm testing with my Apache people account:

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...

However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
the following:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download

http://www.apache.org/dist/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5

http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
aoo/
4.0.0/
source/
aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2



Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-08 Thread Marcus (OOo) 
Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror 
to do some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:


http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/file_name

You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror:

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...

PS:
Is it right that the URL still needs a /download at its end to start 
the download?


Thanks in advance.

Marcus



Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

I've updated the test area in staging:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB,
de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
might be just a missing language. ;-)
And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.

For the first troubleshooting the following could help:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html

Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus



Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):

I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to
apply with the new situation (incubating string is gone, new version,
new directory + filename structure).

If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
as the time is running.



1. I'm working with the following directory structure:

.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/



2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
(especially @Juergen + Ariel)

aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe



3.
I'm testing with my Apache people account:

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...

However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
the following:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download

http://www.apache.org/dist/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5

http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
aoo/
4.0.0/
source/
aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2



Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-08 Thread Andrea Pescetti 

Marcus (OOo) wrote:

I've updated the test area in staging:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html


There are a couple of links in the sidebar to be improved, the rest 
looks very good:

* Release Schedule is actually a Release History, or timeline
* Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently 
consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd 
recommend a link Extensions and Dictionaries pointing to 
extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links.



1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/


Very personal opinion: SDK is not a language and feels out of place 
there. But it is just a matter of preference.



2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
(especially @Juergen + Ariel)
aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2


Since this is our most official package, I would name it
apache-openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
or
Apache_Openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
if we want to use the same naming pattern we use for binaries. Anyway, I 
would prefer to see both Apache and OpenOffice present in full in 
the package name.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

2013-06-08 Thread Marcus (OOo) 

Am 06/09/2013 12:18 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Marcus (OOo) wrote:

I've updated the test area in staging:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html


There are a couple of links in the sidebar to be improved, the rest
looks very good:
* Release Schedule is actually a Release History, or timeline


Right. Wouldn't it then be better to point to the new schedule?


* Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently
consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd
recommend a link Extensions and Dictionaries pointing to
extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links.


Then it's IMHO better to extend the link in the light blue box to speak 
about Get Apache OpenOffice Extensions and Dictionaries and delete the 
link in the nav sidebar.


I've concentrated on the DL links. Thanks for looking right and left. ;-)
Updated.


1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/LANG/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/


Very personal opinion: SDK is not a language and feels out of place
there. But it is just a matter of preference.


Yes, me too. However, we had this discussion last year and some wanted 
to have SDK on the same level as the languages.


Because we save one complexity level I can live with this very well.

We shouldn't forget that this is just the structure on the mirrors. 
Nearly nobody will see or take care about this. ;-)



2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
(especially @Juergen + Ariel)
aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2


Since this is our most official package, I would name it
apache-openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
or
Apache_Openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
if we want to use the same naming pattern we use for binaries. Anyway, I
would prefer to see both Apache and OpenOffice present in full in
the package name.


Good idea.

@Juergen:
As you are producing the source packages, please can you take this into 
account?


Thanks

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org