Re: Fixes for bootstrap?
Hi Don, all > On 07/05/2020 10:08 AM Don Lewis wrote: > > On 5 Jul, Pedro Lino wrote: > > 1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/ > > (Same as situation 4 below) > > As I recall, recent versions of vigra require a C++11 compiler, which > isn't available on some of our older platforms. Thank you for the fast answer! Best regards, Pedro - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Fixes for bootstrap?
On 5 Jul, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Matthias > >> On 07/04/2020 10:55 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Am 04.07.20 um 21:55 schrieb Pedro Lino: > >> > download from >> > http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/vigra-old-versions/vigra1.6.0.tar.gz >> > failed (404 Not Found) >> > download failed >> > >> > This folder no longer exists. Is this link declared somewhere in the build >> > system and could be corrected? >> >> Fixed now, see: >> >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1f9c906e3dac41500b42db556cb26ed2c78558e0 > > Excellent! This raises three additional questions: > > 1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version > https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/ > (Same as situation 4 below) As I recall, recent versions of vigra require a C++11 compiler, which isn't available on some of our older platforms. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Fixes for bootstrap?
Hi Matthias > On 07/05/2020 9:41 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > Am 05.07.20 um 01:35 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > 1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/ > > (Same as situation 4 below) > > Remember, I am not a developer! ;-) > > But it is not done with simply downloading a newer version, most likely > the build must be adapted and patches changed... I do remember. Neither am I ;) Maybe someone on this mailing list who is a developer can have a look into this and the jpeg v9d? And maybe he/she can also provide some feedback on Situations 2 and 3 below? > > 2) Can I approve your commit? > I don't understand this one. My commit is in, I have write access on Git. I saw some changes were approved by other people. Since this is a simple url switch I could approve it > > 3) How can this be cherry picked to branch 4.2.x ? > > I have already cherry-picked it for AOO42X. Excellent. I will do a git pull origin AOO42X ;) Regards, Pedro > > What about situations 2 and 3? > > > > Regards, > > Pedro > > > >>> Second situation: > >>> > >>> Many libraries are downloaded from sourceforge (which frequently has > >>> mirror issues). Couldn't these libraries be hosted on the AOO server? > >>> > >>> E.g. > >>> download from > >>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/files/dejavu/2.37/dejavu-fonts-ttf-2.37.tar.bz2 > >>> failed (302 Found) > >>> download failed > >>> download from > >>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2 > >>> failed (302 Found) > >>> etc > >>> > >>> Third situation: > >>> > >>> Downloaded modules checksums are not verified > >>> > >>> downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 > >>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part > >>> checksum not given, md5 of file is 266d817492d8259a640fad075461080e > >>> downloading epm-3.7.tar.gz > >>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/epm-3.7.tar.gz.part > >>> checksum not given, md5 of file is 3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4 > >>> > >>> Can this be added? All other modules are verified > >>> > >>> Fourth situation: > >>> > >>> downloading to > >>> /source/openoffice/ext_sources/52654eb3b2e60c35731ea8fc87f1bd29-jpeg-8d.tar.gz.part > >>> MD5 checksum is OK > >>> > >>> The current version is jpegsrc.v9d.tar.gz > >>> > >>> Would it make sense to update to this version for branch 42X? version 8d > >>> is from Jan 2012 and 9d from Jan 2020 > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> Pedro > >>> > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Fixes for bootstrap?
Hi Pedro, Am 05.07.20 um 01:35 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias > >> On 07/04/2020 10:55 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Am 04.07.20 um 21:55 schrieb Pedro Lino: >>> download from >>> http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/vigra-old-versions/vigra1.6.0.tar.gz >>> failed (404 Not Found) >>> download failed >>> >>> This folder no longer exists. Is this link declared somewhere in the build >>> system and could be corrected? >> Fixed now, see: >> >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1f9c906e3dac41500b42db556cb26ed2c78558e0 > Excellent! This raises three additional questions: > > 1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version > https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/ > (Same as situation 4 below) Remember, I am not a developer! ;-) But it is not done with simply downloading a newer version, most likely the build must be adapted and patches changed... > Could I just go into github and fix occurrences of jpeg-8d to jpeg-9d (also > fixing the md5)? > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/search?q=jpeg-8d_q=jpeg-8d See above. > > 2) Can I approve your commit? I don't understand this one. My commit is in, I have write access on Git. > 3) How can this be cherry picked to branch 4.2.x ? I have already cherry-picked it for AOO42X. Regards, Matthias > > What about situations 2 and 3? > > Regards, > Pedro > >>> Second situation: >>> >>> Many libraries are downloaded from sourceforge (which frequently has mirror >>> issues). Couldn't these libraries be hosted on the AOO server? >>> >>> E.g. >>> download from >>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/files/dejavu/2.37/dejavu-fonts-ttf-2.37.tar.bz2 >>> failed (302 Found) >>> download failed >>> download from >>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2 >>> failed (302 Found) >>> etc >>> >>> Third situation: >>> >>> Downloaded modules checksums are not verified >>> >>> downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 >>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part >>> checksum not given, md5 of file is 266d817492d8259a640fad075461080e >>> downloading epm-3.7.tar.gz >>> downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/epm-3.7.tar.gz.part >>> checksum not given, md5 of file is 3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4 >>> >>> Can this be added? All other modules are verified >>> >>> Fourth situation: >>> >>> downloading to >>> /source/openoffice/ext_sources/52654eb3b2e60c35731ea8fc87f1bd29-jpeg-8d.tar.gz.part >>> MD5 checksum is OK >>> >>> The current version is jpegsrc.v9d.tar.gz >>> >>> Would it make sense to update to this version for branch 42X? version 8d is >>> from Jan 2012 and 9d from Jan 2020 >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Pedro >>> > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Fixes for bootstrap?
Hi Matthias > On 07/04/2020 10:55 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 04.07.20 um 21:55 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > download from > > http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/vigra-old-versions/vigra1.6.0.tar.gz > > failed (404 Not Found) > > download failed > > > > This folder no longer exists. Is this link declared somewhere in the build > > system and could be corrected? > > Fixed now, see: > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1f9c906e3dac41500b42db556cb26ed2c78558e0 Excellent! This raises three additional questions: 1) wouldn't it make sense to update to the most recent version https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/extras/vigra/vigra-1.11.0-src-clean.tar.gz/md5/e86d096099ccc8f139b6c6fff7b7557e/ (Same as situation 4 below) Could I just go into github and fix occurrences of jpeg-8d to jpeg-9d (also fixing the md5)? https://github.com/apache/openoffice/search?q=jpeg-8d_q=jpeg-8d 2) Can I approve your commit? 3) How can this be cherry picked to branch 4.2.x ? What about situations 2 and 3? Regards, Pedro > > Second situation: > > > > Many libraries are downloaded from sourceforge (which frequently has mirror > > issues). Couldn't these libraries be hosted on the AOO server? > > > > E.g. > > download from > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/files/dejavu/2.37/dejavu-fonts-ttf-2.37.tar.bz2 > > failed (302 Found) > > download failed > > download from > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2 > > failed (302 Found) > > etc > > > > Third situation: > > > > Downloaded modules checksums are not verified > > > > downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 > > downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part > > checksum not given, md5 of file is 266d817492d8259a640fad075461080e > > downloading epm-3.7.tar.gz > > downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/epm-3.7.tar.gz.part > > checksum not given, md5 of file is 3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4 > > > > Can this be added? All other modules are verified > > > > Fourth situation: > > > > downloading to > > /source/openoffice/ext_sources/52654eb3b2e60c35731ea8fc87f1bd29-jpeg-8d.tar.gz.part > > MD5 checksum is OK > > > > The current version is jpegsrc.v9d.tar.gz > > > > Would it make sense to update to this version for branch 42X? version 8d is > > from Jan 2012 and 9d from Jan 2020 > > > > Thanks! > > Pedro > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Fixes for bootstrap?
Hi Pedro, Am 04.07.20 um 21:55 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi all > > I have managed to compile successfully branch 4.2.X under Ubuntu 18.04 x64 > but there are some errors during download of external dependencies that maybe > someone can fix? > > First situaton: > > download from > http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/vigra-old-versions/vigra1.6.0.tar.gz failed > (404 Not Found) > download failed > > This folder no longer exists. Is this link declared somewhere in the build > system and could be corrected? Fixed now, see: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1f9c906e3dac41500b42db556cb26ed2c78558e0 Regards, Matthias > > Second situation: > > Many libraries are downloaded from sourceforge (which frequently has mirror > issues). Couldn't these libraries be hosted on the AOO server? > > E.g. > download from > https://sourceforge.net/projects/dejavu/files/dejavu/2.37/dejavu-fonts-ttf-2.37.tar.bz2 > failed (302 Found) > download failed > download from > https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2 > failed (302 Found) > etc > > Third situation: > > Downloaded modules checksums are not verified > > downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 > downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part > checksum not given, md5 of file is 266d817492d8259a640fad075461080e > downloading epm-3.7.tar.gz > downloading to /source/openoffice/ext_sources/epm-3.7.tar.gz.part > checksum not given, md5 of file is 3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4 > > Can this be added? All other modules are verified > > Fourth situation: > > downloading to > /source/openoffice/ext_sources/52654eb3b2e60c35731ea8fc87f1bd29-jpeg-8d.tar.gz.part > MD5 checksum is OK > > The current version is jpegsrc.v9d.tar.gz > > Would it make sense to update to this version for branch 42X? version 8d is > from Jan 2012 and 9d from Jan 2020 > > Thanks! > Pedro > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
