Hi,
Am 06.12.20 um 15:43 schrieb Mechtilde:
> Hello,
>
> No because I had enough trouble to remove the old epm version
> completely. I t takes three builds to be successful.
Why?!
>
> I don't want to have the same problem with a defect Java installation.
AdoptOpenJDK is not defect...
Matthias
Hello,
No because I had enough trouble to remove the old epm version
completely. I t takes three builds to be successful.
I don't want to have the same problem with a defect Java installation.
Kind regards
Mechtilde
Am 06.12.20 um 15:25 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 06.12.20 um 15:11 schrieb
Am 06.12.20 um 15:11 schrieb Mechtilde:
> Hello Arrigo,
>
> thanks for your reply. as I mentioned, I have no machine to build the
> patch with gcc >= 7 and a Java version 8.x
>
> So I need help to fix the java problem before I can revies the fix
>
> Maybe another person on another system can
Hello Arrigo,
thanks for your reply. as I mentioned, I have no machine to build the
patch with gcc >= 7 and a Java version 8.x
So I need help to fix the java problem before I can revies the fix
Maybe another person on another system can review it.
For me it isn't an opinion to create a further
Hello,
I am replying as I proposed PR #109.
thank you Mechtilde for your review.
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 01:57:50PM +0100, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i was asked to text the PR 109 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/109
>
> I tried to do it under Debian 10.
>
> gcc 8.3
> java 11
>
