Re: What to focus on next

2021-05-27 Thread Marcus

Am 27.05.21 um 19:53 schrieb Marcus:

Am 27.05.21 um 19:38 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 27.05.21 um 19:10 schrieb Marcus:

Am 27.05.21 um 16:18 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 27.05.21 um 16:07 schrieb Dave Fisher:

IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to
always allow to look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are
looking to build right now then 4.2.0dev.


Yes, 4.2.0-Dev3 would simply be an official "snapshot" of what we have
in branch AOO42X.

4.1.11 needs a lot more work to be released.


Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0?


+1


please not as mails. IMHO this will end in a total mess and nobody is
able to keep the overview. ;-)

Good idea!


Better to create a Confluence page, start with the list of opened and
targeted issues [1]. Then we can discuss which issues we can fix for
4.2.0.


I would simply start with the list of Release Blockers:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=CONFIRMED_status=ACCEPTED_status=REOPENED_status=RESOLVED_status=VERIFIED_status=CLOSED=flagtypes.name_id=248770=substring=changeddate%20DESC%2Cbug_id%20DESC_based_on=4.2.0_blocker_requested%2B_format=advanced=---=FIXED=4.2.0_release_blocker 



I've started this list:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Blocker+issues+4.2.0

Will now add the classified blockers also.


done.

Let's start the discussion now.

Marcus




On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel
 wrote:

Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel
 wrote:

Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
 wrote:

I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish
before 4.2.0?
Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to
4.1.99 ! ;-)


FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best
solution, but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on
4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X.

We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.

What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got
urgent...


So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?

I don't see a problem to do both?



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: What to focus on next

2021-05-27 Thread Marcus

Am 27.05.21 um 19:38 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 27.05.21 um 19:10 schrieb Marcus:

Am 27.05.21 um 16:18 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 27.05.21 um 16:07 schrieb Dave Fisher:

IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to
always allow to look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are
looking to build right now then 4.2.0dev.


Yes, 4.2.0-Dev3 would simply be an official "snapshot" of what we have
in branch AOO42X.

4.1.11 needs a lot more work to be released.


Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0?


+1


please not as mails. IMHO this will end in a total mess and nobody is
able to keep the overview. ;-)

Good idea!


Better to create a Confluence page, start with the list of opened and
targeted issues [1]. Then we can discuss which issues we can fix for
4.2.0.


I would simply start with the list of Release Blockers:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=CONFIRMED_status=ACCEPTED_status=REOPENED_status=RESOLVED_status=VERIFIED_status=CLOSED=flagtypes.name_id=248770=substring=changeddate%20DESC%2Cbug_id%20DESC_based_on=4.2.0_blocker_requested%2B_format=advanced=---=FIXED=4.2.0_release_blocker


I've started this list:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Blocker+issues+4.2.0

Will now add the classified blockers also.

Marcus




[1]
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced=---_milestone=4.2.0

Marcus




On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel
 wrote:

Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel
 wrote:

Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
 wrote:

I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish
before 4.2.0?
Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to
4.1.99 ! ;-)


FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best
solution, but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on
4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X.

We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.

What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got
urgent...


So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?

I don't see a problem to do both?



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: What to focus on next

2021-05-27 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Marcus,

Am 27.05.21 um 19:10 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 27.05.21 um 16:18 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 27.05.21 um 16:07 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>> IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to
>>> always allow to look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are
>>> looking to build right now then 4.2.0dev.
>>
>> Yes, 4.2.0-Dev3 would simply be an official "snapshot" of what we have
>> in branch AOO42X.
>>
>> 4.1.11 needs a lot more work to be released.
>>
>>> Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0?
>>
>> +1
>
> please not as mails. IMHO this will end in a total mess and nobody is
> able to keep the overview. ;-)
Good idea!
>
> Better to create a Confluence page, start with the list of opened and
> targeted issues [1]. Then we can discuss which issues we can fix for
> 4.2.0.

I would simply start with the list of Release Blockers:

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=CONFIRMED_status=ACCEPTED_status=REOPENED_status=RESOLVED_status=VERIFIED_status=CLOSED=flagtypes.name_id=248770=substring=changeddate%20DESC%2Cbug_id%20DESC_based_on=4.2.0_blocker_requested%2B_format=advanced=---=FIXED=4.2.0_release_blocker

Matthias

>
> [1]
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced=---_milestone=4.2.0
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
 On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel
  wrote:
> Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>>  wrote:
>> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
  wrote:

 I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish
 before 4.2.0?
 Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to
 4.1.99 ! ;-)

>>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best
>>> solution, but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on
>>> 4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X.
>> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
>> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.
>>
>> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got
>> urgent...
>>
> So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
 I don't see a problem to do both?
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: What to focus on next

2021-05-27 Thread Marcus

Am 27.05.21 um 16:18 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Am 27.05.21 um 16:07 schrieb Dave Fisher:

IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to always allow to 
look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are looking to build right now then 
4.2.0dev.


Yes, 4.2.0-Dev3 would simply be an official "snapshot" of what we have
in branch AOO42X.

4.1.11 needs a lot more work to be released.


Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0?


+1


please not as mails. IMHO this will end in a total mess and nobody is 
able to keep the overview. ;-)


Better to create a Confluence page, start with the list of opened and 
targeted issues [1]. Then we can discuss which issues we can fix for 4.2.0.


[1] 
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced=---_milestone=4.2.0


Marcus




On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel  wrote:

Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel  wrote:

Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori  wrote:

I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)


FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, but I don't see 
why we should continue to "focus" on 4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X.

We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.

What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got urgent...


So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?

I don't see a problem to do both?



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: What to focus on next

2021-05-27 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Dave,

Am 27.05.21 um 16:07 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to always allow 
> to look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are looking to build right now 
> then 4.2.0dev.

Yes, 4.2.0-Dev3 would simply be an official "snapshot" of what we have
in branch AOO42X.

4.1.11 needs a lot more work to be released.

>
> Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0?

+1

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> All The Best,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>>> Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>
> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
 Hi Jim,

 Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori  
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)
>>
> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, 
> but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on 4.1.X at the expense 
> of 4.2.X.
 We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
 But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.

 What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got urgent...

 Regards,

>>> So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
>> I don't see a problem to do both?
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: What to focus on next

2021-05-27 Thread Dave Fisher
IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to always allow to 
look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are looking to build right now then 
4.2.0dev.

Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0?

All The Best,
Dave

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
>> Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> 
 On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)
> 
 FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, 
 but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on 4.1.X at the expense 
 of 4.2.X.
>>> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
>>> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.
>>> 
>>> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got urgent...
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>> So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
> 
> I don't see a problem to do both?
> 
> Matthias
> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: What to focus on next

2021-05-27 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim,

Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
>> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori  
 wrote:


 I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
 Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)

>>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, 
>>> but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on 4.1.X at the expense 
>>> of 4.2.X.
>> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
>> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.
>>
>> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got urgent...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
> So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?

I don't see a problem to do both?

Matthias

> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature