Re: [dev] Important Process for Mercurial Users

2009-08-26 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Bernd, On Friday 31 July 2009, Bernd Eilers wrote: Everyone using a mercurial based CWS MUST enter the new milestone in EIS manually after rebasing the CWS to a new milestone using mercurial commandline or gui tools. Cannot this be automated? With git, all you'd need is to have a

[dev] Would like to participate

2009-08-26 Thread Mina Maurice
Hi, I am an Egyptian software developer living in London, I started my career by working 2 years as teacher in the university, and by 2008 I decided to go to work in the field. I am working with Java technologies. I would like to participate in an open source project to learn more, meet new

Re: [dev] Important Process for Mercurial Users

2009-08-26 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Hi Jan, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Heiner, On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: Everyone using a mercurial based CWS MUST enter the new milestone in EIS manually after rebasing the CWS to a new milestone using mercurial commandline or gui tools. Cannot this be automated?

Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-26 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, overlooked this ... On Wednesday, 2009-08-19 10:20:18 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:56:23AM +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: The new Math libraries 'Special Functions' and 'Statistical Distribution' are not included in Boost 1.34, but first in Boost 1.35.

Re: [dev] How to update l10n and rebuild?

2009-08-26 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Kristján, On Friday, 2009-08-21 11:30:57 +, Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: I am building OO in cygwin with DEV300_m54, which works fine. However I am having problems updating the build after I have changed a few strings in the l10n module. The problem is that building again

Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-26 Thread Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany
Hi Eike, However, having the boost math lib would be of great benefit for Calc, so I strongly vote for possibly the latest version of boost that's available, but at least 1.35 I didn't hear any strong objections against using 1.39 (or 1.38 at least for system-boost), so I think I'll go for

Re: [dev] Important Process for Mercurial Users

2009-08-26 Thread Martin Hollmichel
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: Hi Jan, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Bernd, On Friday 31 July 2009, Bernd Eilers wrote: Everyone using a mercurial based CWS MUST enter the new milestone in EIS manually after rebasing the CWS to a new milestone using mercurial commandline or gui tools. Cannot