Re: [dev] --enable-crashdump=STATIC
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 10:23 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Does anybody remember what --enable-crashdump=STATIC should have been good for? Should it still be relevant? Issue 16528, issue 16633. I think the idea was that using STATIC would link the graphical crash reporter statically against gtk, while true/yes would link it dynamically. There isn't a graphical gtk crashreporter anymore right ?, if so then STATIC/TRUE can go away. As can crashrep/interface.* interface/res.cxx etc. seeing as I only see main.obj mentioned in the makefile.mk there. Also presumably the -lXext -lX11 for MacosX is bogus as well etc. C. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] --enable-crashdump=STATIC
Hi, Le 6 janv. 10 à 10:42, Caolán McNamara a écrit : Also presumably the -lXext -lX11 for MacosX is bogus as well etc. You're right : it was correct in the X11 times. Today, everything X11 is completely obsolete in the sources. Regards, Eric Bachard -- qɔᴉɹə
Re: [dev] --enable-crashdump=STATIC
On 01/06/10 10:42, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 10:23 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Does anybody remember what --enable-crashdump=STATIC should have been good for? Should it still be relevant? Issue 16528, issue 16633. I think the idea was that using STATIC would link the graphical crash reporter statically against gtk, while true/yes would link it dynamically. There isn't a graphical gtk crashreporter anymore right ?, if so then STATIC/TRUE can go away. As can crashrep/interface.* interface/res.cxx etc. seeing as I only see main.obj mentioned in the makefile.mk there. Also presumably the -lXext -lX11 for MacosX is bogus as well etc. Thanks; filed http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108102. -Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
