On 01/11/10 19:40, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
Yes, in FreeBSD it's /usr/local/bin/bash (but there's /bin/sh if POSIX shell is
enough)
And there is no /bin/bash (which would probably be a link to
/usr/local/bin/bash)? Just to be sure...
-Stephan
Hi Stephan
From: Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergm...@sun.com
Subject: Re: [dev] drop tcsh support?
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:41:44 +0100
On 01/11/10 19:40, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
Yes, in FreeBSD it's /usr/local/bin/bash (but there's /bin/sh if POSIX
shell is enough)
And there is no /bin
On 01/11/10 20:17, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Regarding POSIX: I already did bash-builds with the POSIXLY_CORRECT
environment variable - no problem at all. (so /bin/sh could be used as
a fallback, possibly with an appropriate configure-warning-message)
My understanding is that bash posix mode
On 01/12/10 09:44, Maho NAKATA wrote:
On 01/11/10 19:40, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
Yes, in FreeBSD it's /usr/local/bin/bash (but there's /bin/sh if POSIX
shell is enough)
And there is no /bin/bash (which would probably be a link to
/usr/local/bin/bash)? Just to be sure...
No /bin/bash.
From: Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergm...@sun.com
Subject: Re: [dev] drop tcsh support?
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:49:03 +0100
On 01/12/10 09:44, Maho NAKATA wrote:
On 01/11/10 19:40, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
Yes, in FreeBSD it's /usr/local/bin/bash (but there's /bin/sh if POSIX
shell is enough
Two questions remain:
For one, the to-be-sourced scripts currently ensure that USE_SHELL's
path is in PATH, but I see no reason for that?
For another, are there any relevant configurations where bash is not at
/bin/bash?
Yes, in FreeBSD it's /usr/local/bin/bash (but there's /bin/sh if
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Stephan Bergmann
stephan.bergm...@sun.com wrote:
Any objections against dropping support for using tcsh as the shell invoked
by dmake within the OOo code base?
We had that discussion lately and the results were: No objections. At
least nobody did complain/wanted
