On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 13:51 +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany
wrote:
Hi Terrence,
A website page about building OOo says that non-product builds are
used almost exclusively within Sun. For a long time, I incorrectly
took that to be a warning that they are hard to
My thanks go to Stephan Bergmann, who also responded to my question.
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 15:00 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Terrence,
On Friday, 2010-03-26 13:42:28 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
However, I have not found what library holds the object code for
operators_new_delete.cxx.
Hi Terrence,
A website page about building OOo says that non-product builds are
used almost exclusively within Sun. For a long time, I incorrectly
took that to be a warning that they are hard to accomplish rather than
merely a description of a regrettable state of affairs. Perhaps we do
On 03/30/10 13:31, Terrence Enger wrote:
( I think, though, that I am giving up on trying to use a non-product
build when I actually want to get work done grin /. )
:) That's exactly the reason why I want those non-pros to be
effectively assertion free---which in turn I believe can only be
On 03/26/10 18:42, Terrence Enger wrote:
However, I have not found what library holds the object code for
operators_new_delete.cxx. So it is hard to set a breakpoint to see
what heap address is causing the assertion. (When a system library is
calling delete or delete[], it is hard to work back
Hi Terrence,
On Friday, 2010-03-26 13:42:28 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
However, I have not found what library holds the object code for
operators_new_delete.cxx.
Let's see.. operators_new_delete.cxx is in sal/cpprt/, the
sal/cpprt/makefile.mk says TARGET=salcpprt, then for $(OS) !=
SOLARIS
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 15:15 +0100, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems
Germany wrote:
Hi Terrence,
Since I created issue 110236
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110236 yesterday, I
have encountered many occurrences.
I have some time available. Do you have any
Hi Terrence,
Since I created issue 110236
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110236 yesterday, I
have encountered many occurrences.
I have some time available. Do you have any suggestions about what this
means
usually, it means somebody did something like
char* foo = new
