Re: [OSM-dev] [josm-dev] Problem with large changeset

2010-07-06 Thread Andy Allan
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote: If you retrieve a node with http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/node/54530540 , you get a longitude with 7 decimal places. If, as JOSM does, you retrieve objects by bounding box with

Re: [OSM-dev] [josm-dev] Problem with large changeset

2010-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 6 July 2010 18:54, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote: suggests* that double results are printed to (a maximum of) 9 significant figures, which is fine for latitude and fine if all your testing longitudes cover, say, UK and Germany. You do realise, regardless of the latitude, anything

Re: [OSM-dev] [josm-dev] Problem with large changeset

2010-07-06 Thread Andy Allan
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:10 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 July 2010 18:54, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote: suggests* that double results are printed to (a maximum of) 9 significant figures, which is fine for latitude and fine if all your testing longitudes

Re: [OSM-dev] [josm-dev] Problem with large changeset

2010-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 6 July 2010 19:16, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote: whether 7 decimal places is too many (most times I've heard it discussed some people have asked for more) is something entirely different. At this point it's almost pointless to have more than 6dp of accuracy since we're not likely

[OSM-dev] Tirex

2010-07-06 Thread Jochen Topf
Hi! I just finished my slides for the Tirex lightning talk that I hope to give at SOTM. Not everybody is coming to SOTM, so I thought I might highlight some things here: Tirex is a tile rendering system. So its sits behind a web server and makes sure map tiles are rendered when they are needed.

Re: [osmosis-dev] Project Restructure

2010-07-06 Thread Frederik Ramm
Brett, Brett Henderson wrote: I haven't created a 0.36 detailed usage page on the wiki yet but will do so before releasing. There are a few other random goodies in the latest development release that I'd like to release in the near future. Will there be significant changes in ordinary

[osmosis-dev] keyValueList option, and latest node versions

2010-07-06 Thread Simon Nuttall
We use osmosis to merge geofabrik's UK and Ireland extracts to fill a database from which we build the CycleStreets.net routing structures. osmosis -v 100 --read-xml data/osm/downloads/great_britain.osm enableDateParsing=no --sort-0.6 type=TypeThenId --read-xml data/osm/downloads/ireland.osm

Re: [osmosis-dev] keyValueList option, and latest node versions

2010-07-06 Thread Peter Körner
Am 06.07.2010 19:41, schrieb Simon Nuttall: Are there osmosis options for just catching the latest versions of the nodes and ways? It's called --simplify-changeset: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmosis/Detailed_Usage_0.35#--simplify-change_.28--simc.29 Peter

Re: [josm-dev] Problem with large changeset

2010-07-06 Thread Sebastian Klein
Alan Mintz wrote: If I bring up the history dialog for this node, it says that v2 was edited in changeset 3504242, agreeing with the OSM file, but that it's coordinates were 33.80988, -117.40063. It says that v3 was edited in changeset 5131096 (the one in question) and the coordinates are

Re: [josm-dev] Problem with large changeset

2010-07-06 Thread Sebastian Klein
Alan Mintz wrote: At 2010-07-06 01:16, Sebastian Klein wrote: (But you said something about way conflicts, have you analysed these as well?) Not quite yet. The few I looked at were because the ways contained new nodes (with negative IDs) that had not been updated with the newly-assigned

Re: [josm-dev] Problem with large changeset

2010-07-06 Thread Alan Mintz
At 2010-07-06 04:14, Sebastian Klein wrote: Alan Mintz wrote: At 2010-07-06 01:16, Sebastian Klein wrote: All this is only true if you upload in a single request. In chunked mode, this applies for each chunk separately. If you have a problem in a later chunk, it is usually a good idea to