On 2016-08-12 13:14, Paul Norman wrote:
The usage policy for tile.openstreetmap.org requires that users send a
valid user-agent[1], or, in the case of a web browser, a HTTP Referer.
Ops are looking into automatically rate limiting clients violating this
part of the policy.[2]
I have wondered
On 8/12/2016 11:27 AM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
I would also like to point out that there might be a conflict of
interest here between commercial operators of OpenStreetMap services,
and the rest of the community.
While in theory there could be a conflict, most of the admins do not
sell tile
On 12 August 2016 at 12:34, Maarten Deen wrote:
> On 2016-08-12 13:14, Paul Norman wrote:
>>
>> The usage policy for tile.openstreetmap.org requires that users send a
>> valid user-agent[1], or, in the case of a web browser, a HTTP Referer.
>> Ops are looking into automatically
The usage policy for tile.openstreetmap.org requires that users send a
valid user-agent[1], or, in the case of a web browser, a HTTP Referer.
Ops are looking into automatically rate limiting clients violating this
part of the policy.[2]
The reason for rate limiting instead of blocking is that if
What are the plans to scale the tile provision infrastructure?
If servers are overloaded, do we need a donation drive to buy new one, or
are there known countries where we have bandwidth problems?
пт, 12 авг. 2016 г. в 17:00, Andy Allan :
> On 12 August 2016 at 12:34,
On 12 August 2016 at 16:32, Komяpa wrote:
> What are the plans to scale the tile provision infrastructure?
We should be clear here - we have more than enough capacity to handle
all the traffic generated by our mappers, editing software and every
website run by the OSMF, local
On Friday 12 August 2016, Andy Allan wrote:
>
> We've always allowed other people to use our spare capacity on the
> tileservers, but recently it's got completely out of hand. Most of
> the use of our tileservers has become developers looking for free
> maps, nothing to do with the rest of the
On 12 August 2016 at 19:11, Andy Allan wrote:
> We've always allowed other people to use our spare capacity on the
> tileservers, but recently it's got completely out of hand. Most of the
> use of our tileservers has become developers looking for free maps,
> nothing to do
Am 12.08.2016 um 20:27 schrieb Matthijs Melissen:
>
> I would tend to disagree.
>
> Our Articles of Association state:
>
> | 3. The Foundation is established for the purposes listed below:
> |
> | (1) encouraging the growth, development and distribution of free geospatial
> | data; and
> |
Hi, Matthiijs,
| (2) providing geospatial data for anybody to use and share
Data does not mean tiles. Companies may/should/have to dowload *osm raw
data* (e.g. the planet file), to feed their local tile generation chain.
regards
walter
___
dev
On 8/12/2016 4:34 AM, Maarten Deen wrote:
I have wondered about this. Does rate limiting now not occur? I have
seen a lot of times that the map in the JOSM downloadscreen gets slow
if you pan around a lot or use it a lot to download lots of small
areas. Also the mapnik overlay has this issue.
11 matches
Mail list logo