Re: [OSM-dev] 403 forbidden

2019-05-30 Thread Vijaya Nand
Please suggest me how I can get OSM API user id and password so that I can pass that to authenticate. Please suggest me how I can check what's wrong with gmap.net. On Wed, 29 May 2019, 17:09 Mateusz Konieczny, wrote: > Technical requirements are at >

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM tile server issue

2019-05-30 Thread Grant Slater
Hi Rodolfo, Reply per snippet... On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 19:38, Justmapzz Rodolfo wrote: > > Here is another victim of your usage policy. > I am the main developer of Justmapzz, which uses GMAP.NET for map viewing. > Since 2 days our users can no longer view OSM, because you blocked that >

[OSM-dev] API Basic Authentication

2019-05-30 Thread Colin Smale
A (private) program I use which accesses the OSM API has stopped working since the last time I used it, a couple of weeks ago. Read-only calls to the API, including a (proven correct) Authentication header are now failing with 401 Unauthorized, with the returned body indicating a problem with the

Re: [OSM-dev] API Basic Authentication

2019-05-30 Thread Tom Hughes
On 30/05/2019 20:33, Colin Smale wrote: A (private) program I use which accesses the OSM API has stopped working since the last time I used it, a couple of weeks ago. Read-only calls to the API, including a (proven correct) Authentication header are now failing with 401 Unauthorized, with the

Re: [OSM-dev] API Basic Authentication

2019-05-30 Thread Simon Poole
See https://github.com/zerebubuth/openstreetmap-cgimap/issues/189 Your app should be working again right now as Tom has reverted back to the Rails implemetation, still you should likely be using OAuth to start with. Simon Am 30.05.2019 um 21:33 schrieb Colin Smale: > > A (private) program I use

Re: [OSM-dev] API Basic Authentication

2019-05-30 Thread Tom Hughes
I only reverted upload, not the method he is using. Tom On 30/05/2019 20:43, Simon Poole wrote: See https://github.com/zerebubuth/openstreetmap-cgimap/issues/189 Your app should be working again right now as Tom has reverted back to the Rails implemetation, still you should likely be using

Re: [OSM-dev] API Basic Authentication

2019-05-30 Thread Colin Smale
Thanks Tom, it is indeed working with the username. Colin On 2019-05-30 21:45, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 30/05/2019 20:33, Colin Smale wrote: > >> A (private) program I use which accesses the OSM API has stopped working >> since the last time I used it, a couple of weeks ago. Read-only calls to

Re: [OSM-dev] API Basic Authentication

2019-05-30 Thread Colin Smale
On 2019-05-30 21:43, Simon Poole wrote: > See https://github.com/zerebubuth/openstreetmap-cgimap/issues/189 > > Your app should be working again right now as Tom has reverted back to the > Rails implemetation, still you should likely be using OAuth to start with. It is indeed working now. I

Re: [OSM-dev] Sync time in OSM file

2019-05-30 Thread wambacher
Am 30.05.19 um 09:40 schrieb Ajay Singh1 via dev: > So, osmupdate will update my local copy with changes done in > openstreetmap.org and I can ignore > geofabric's copy as of now, right? > Don't forget to use the *-B* option

Re: [OSM-dev] Sync time in OSM file

2019-05-30 Thread Ajay Singh1 via dev
Yes. That's what I wanted to ask. Thanks. On Thu, May 30, 2019, 1:15 PM Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > 30 May 2019, 08:44 by dev@openstreetmap.org: > > Also, what is the difference in sync time when I choose "Allow for review" > after I add a new road? > > None, in both cases edits are immediately

Re: [OSM-dev] Sync time in OSM file

2019-05-30 Thread Ajay Singh1 via dev
Yes. I'll go through the documentation before using it :) On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 3:26 PM wrote: > > Am 30.05.19 um 09:40 schrieb Ajay Singh1 via dev: > > So, osmupdate will update my local copy with changes done in > openstreetmap.org and I can ignore geofabric's copy as of now, right? > >

Re: [OSM-dev] Sync time in OSM file

2019-05-30 Thread Ajay Singh1 via dev
Thanks for the clarification. On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 1:16 PM Gerd Petermann < gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Developer Discussion mailing list wrote > > So, osmupdate will update my local copy with changes done in > > openstreetmap.org and I can ignore geofabric's copy as of now,

[OSM-dev] Sync time in OSM file

2019-05-30 Thread Ajay Singh1 via dev
Hi Team, I've added few roads via openstreetmap.org manually. I wanted to know how much time does it take to reflect this change into India's PBF file. I use https://download.geofabrik.de/asia/india.html to download the file. Also, what is the difference in sync time when I choose "Allow for

Re: [OSM-dev] Sync time in OSM file

2019-05-30 Thread Ajay Singh1 via dev
Thanks, Gerd. That was helpful. This OSMupdate keep my local copy in sync with OSM file services, e.g. geofabrik.de. but these file services will themselves take one day to update them with changes done in openstreetmap.org. Am I right? On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:41 PM Gerd Petermann <

Re: [OSM-dev] Sync time in OSM file

2019-05-30 Thread Gerd Petermann
My understanding is that geofabrik keeps a copy of the OSM database. I don't know what tools they use to keep that database in sync with OSM and what exactly is done to create the extracts. Osmupdate is a tool which allows to update an extract with the diffs. You probably don't get exactly the

Re: [OSM-dev] Sync time in OSM file

2019-05-30 Thread Gerd Petermann
I think the pbf extracts from geofabrik are typically updated once per day. If you want to keep such an extract up to date you should look at the diffs, see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmupdate Not sure what is meant with "Allow for review", I assume it is a tag that is set in the

Re: [OSM-dev] Sync time in OSM file

2019-05-30 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
30 May 2019, 08:44 by dev@openstreetmap.org: > Also, what is the difference in sync time when I choose "Allow for review" > after I add a new road? > None, in both cases edits are immediately saved into database and distributed (it would be phrased better as "Request review of my edits" - which

Re: [OSM-dev] Sync time in OSM file

2019-05-30 Thread Gerd Petermann
Developer Discussion mailing list wrote > So, osmupdate will update my local copy with changes done in > openstreetmap.org and I can ignore geofabric's copy as of now, right? I think so, please try it. -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Developer-Discussion-f5233107.html

Re: [OSM-dev] Sync time in OSM file

2019-05-30 Thread Ajay Singh1 via dev
So, osmupdate will update my local copy with changes done in openstreetmap.org and I can ignore geofabric's copy as of now, right? On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 1:02 PM Gerd Petermann < gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > My understanding is that geofabrik keeps a copy of the OSM database. I >

[OSM-dev] Auto Upload tags from GPX file

2019-05-30 Thread Akshat Airan via dev
Hi Community, Can someone please guide me to auto upload the tags using GPX files that I have created locally. For the clarification, I am about talking about the tags mentioned in the below image. These tags appear after I start making the roads into OSM. Is it even possible to do it? [image:

[OSM-dev] OSM tile server issue

2019-05-30 Thread Justmapzz Rodolfo
Title: OSM tile server issue Here is another victim of your usage policy. I am the main developer of Justmapzz, which uses GMAP.NET for map viewing. Since 2 days our users can no longer view OSM, because you blocked that library for everybody. We have always used GMAP.NET  "as is", without

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM tile server issue

2019-05-30 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
30 May 2019, 20:21 by rodo...@justmapzz.com : > I am the main developer of Justmapzz, which uses GMAP.NET for map viewing (...) >  In the mean time, what must we do to comply with your usage policy, other >than changing the user-agent, which appeared to be

Re: [OSM-dev] OSM tile server issue

2019-05-30 Thread Tom Hughes
On 30/05/2019 19:43, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: 30 May 2019, 20:21 by rodo...@justmapzz.com : I am the main developer of Justmapzz, which uses GMAP.NET for map viewing (...)   In the mean time, what must we do to comply with your usage policy, other than