Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql tile expiry performance

2019-06-04 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi, Am 29.05.19 um 21:40 schrieb j: > WEEKLY changeset using 0.92: > -=-=-=- > time $OSM2PGSQL --append -s -C 3000 -G --hstore -d gis -H $PGHOST -U \ > $PGUSER -r xml changes.osc \ > --flat-nodes /database/postgresql/OSM-FLATNODES --slim \ > --number-processes 4 --style openstreetmap-carto.style

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql tile expiry performance

2019-06-04 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi, Am 30.05.19 um 00:09 schrieb j: > I note that initial testing of this code used an extract of Europe: > https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/pull/747 > > I did not note it earlier, but I am working with the planet. I doubt > these issues would present themselves on a modestly sized

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql tile expiry performance

2019-06-04 Thread Sven Geggus
j wrote: > I'm afraid I do not have precise timings, but I'm seeing what appears > to be at least an order of magnitude performance penalty, probably due > to memory exhaustion. I can not confirm this. I have running the new tile Expiry code at least since December 2017. As I am about to setup

Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql tile expiry performance

2019-06-04 Thread j
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 14:28:38 +0200 Michael Reichert wrote: > Just to ensure that all important test conditions are known. > > Do you mean the weekly changesets dump from > https://planet.openstreetmap.org/planet/changesets-latest.osm.bz2? Or > how did you create changes.osc or where did you