On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:00:25PM +0100, Peter Körner wrote:
Am 11.03.2013 21:10, schrieb Sven Geggus:
Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
what way would you choose and wich tools could be used to go that way?
Use the Water-Polygons from openstreetmapdata.com instead of land
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:00:25PM +0100, Peter Körner wrote:
That's not that easy for the polar regions, because transforming the
splittet polygons to the destination projection results in gaps
because of straigt lines
On Wednesday 13 March 2013, Jochen Topf wrote:
Another option would be to split up the long straight lines resulting
from the splitting into shorter pieces. If the pieces are short
enough, it should be okay. Maybe there is some tool around that can
do that easily? I don't want to put more and
Am 11.03.2013 21:10, schrieb Sven Geggus:
Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
what way would you choose and wich tools could be used to go that way?
Use the Water-Polygons from openstreetmapdata.com instead of land
polygons.
That's not that easy for the polar regions, because
Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
what way would you choose and wich tools could be used to go that way?
Use the Water-Polygons from openstreetmapdata.com instead of land
polygons.
This way you can use a layer order like this:
* gray background
* hillshade
* water polygons without
On Thursday 07 March 2013, Peter Körner wrote:
b) extend the image with value 181 at the borders to fit the size of
the image i'm going to render
My question is:
what way would you choose and wich tools could be used to go that
way?
for b:
gdalwarp -dstnodata 181
Note it is usually best
6 matches
Mail list logo
