Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovs-vswitchd: Better diagnose errors in DPDK command-line options.

2014-09-30 Thread Ben Pfaff
Thanks a lot.  Applied to master.

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:14:21PM +, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
> Yes, I tested with and without DPDK.  It didn't cause any problem for me
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Daniele
> 
> On 9/30/14, 11:10 AM, "Ben Pfaff"  wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:11:10PM +, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
> >> On 9/30/14, 9:57 AM, "Ben Pfaff"  wrote:
> >> 
> >> >With DPDK compiled in, when the --dpdk option was given other than as
> >>the
> >> >first command-line argument, ovs-vswitchd silently ignored it.  Without
> >> >DPDK compiled in, when the --dpdk option was given anywhere,
> >>ovs-vswitchd
> >> >silently ignored it.  However, in each case any options following
> >>--dpdk
> >> >were not ignored, and since --dpdk is normally followed by additional
> >> >DPDK-specific options, this caused even more confusing trouble.
> >> >
> >> >Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff 
> >> 
> >> Acked-by: Daniele Di Proietto 
> >
> >I only tested this without DPDK.  I guess that you checked that it
> >didn't cause any problem when built with DPDK?
> >
> >(I should have mentioned this in the commit message above.)
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Ben.
> 
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovs-vswitchd: Better diagnose errors in DPDK command-line options.

2014-09-30 Thread Daniele Di Proietto
Yes, I tested with and without DPDK.  It didn't cause any problem for me

Thanks,

Daniele

On 9/30/14, 11:10 AM, "Ben Pfaff"  wrote:

>On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:11:10PM +, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
>> On 9/30/14, 9:57 AM, "Ben Pfaff"  wrote:
>> 
>> >With DPDK compiled in, when the --dpdk option was given other than as
>>the
>> >first command-line argument, ovs-vswitchd silently ignored it.  Without
>> >DPDK compiled in, when the --dpdk option was given anywhere,
>>ovs-vswitchd
>> >silently ignored it.  However, in each case any options following
>>--dpdk
>> >were not ignored, and since --dpdk is normally followed by additional
>> >DPDK-specific options, this caused even more confusing trouble.
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff 
>> 
>> Acked-by: Daniele Di Proietto 
>
>I only tested this without DPDK.  I guess that you checked that it
>didn't cause any problem when built with DPDK?
>
>(I should have mentioned this in the commit message above.)
>
>Thanks,
>
>Ben.

___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovs-vswitchd: Better diagnose errors in DPDK command-line options.

2014-09-30 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:11:10PM +, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
> On 9/30/14, 9:57 AM, "Ben Pfaff"  wrote:
> 
> >With DPDK compiled in, when the --dpdk option was given other than as the
> >first command-line argument, ovs-vswitchd silently ignored it.  Without
> >DPDK compiled in, when the --dpdk option was given anywhere, ovs-vswitchd
> >silently ignored it.  However, in each case any options following --dpdk
> >were not ignored, and since --dpdk is normally followed by additional
> >DPDK-specific options, this caused even more confusing trouble.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff 
> 
> Acked-by: Daniele Di Proietto 

I only tested this without DPDK.  I guess that you checked that it
didn't cause any problem when built with DPDK?

(I should have mentioned this in the commit message above.)

Thanks,

Ben.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovs-vswitchd: Better diagnose errors in DPDK command-line options.

2014-09-30 Thread Daniele Di Proietto
On 9/30/14, 9:57 AM, "Ben Pfaff"  wrote:

>With DPDK compiled in, when the --dpdk option was given other than as the
>first command-line argument, ovs-vswitchd silently ignored it.  Without
>DPDK compiled in, when the --dpdk option was given anywhere, ovs-vswitchd
>silently ignored it.  However, in each case any options following --dpdk
>were not ignored, and since --dpdk is normally followed by additional
>DPDK-specific options, this caused even more confusing trouble.
>
>Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff 

Acked-by: Daniele Di Proietto 

___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev