On 12/10/2016 13:04, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 06:22:15PM -0700, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
>> I think it's clearer to use RCU than to check for a pointer twice in the
>> fast path (before and after taking the spinlock). Now the spinlock is
>> integrated into
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 06:22:15PM -0700, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
> I think it's clearer to use RCU than to check for a pointer twice in the
> fast path (before and after taking the spinlock). Now the spinlock is
> integrated into 'qos_conf'.
>
> 'qos_conf' objects cannot be modified, so,