Replication fails with OWB 1.1.4

Hi, weeks ago, i created an issue that OWB failover does not work anymore. The issue was a compatiblity mismatch between MSM (memcached-session-manager) and Tomcat 7.0.21 or higher. Currently we stay with Tomcat 7.0.21 and our replication works fine. Today i upgraded to OWB 1.1.4 and our failover

Re: Replication fails with OWB 1.1.4

, strub - Original Message - From: Thomas Andraschko zoi...@googlemail.com To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:59 AM Subject: Replication fails with OWB 1.1.4 Hi, weeks ago, i created an issue that OWB failover does not work anymore

Re: Replication fails with OWB 1.1.4

? LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Thomas Andraschko zoi...@googlemail.com To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Cc: Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 2:50 PM Subject: Re: Replication fails with OWB 1.1.4 Hi Mark! it seems that this few tiny

Rework logger API (OWB-674) breaks failover/serialization

Hi, AFAICS the old WebBeansLogger was serializable and JUL isn't. This breaks again the failover because OWB has some or many non-static loggers. It's really annoying because since 1.1.3, every version destroyed the failover mechanism. Is there any reason for non-static loggers? The non-static

Re: Rework logger API (OWB-674) breaks failover/serialization

This loggers could be static: PluginLoader AbstractMetaDataDiscovery OsgiMetaDataScannerService FailOverBag FailOverBagWrapper There are 2 other classes where it can't be static without changes. Should we set them as transient? WebContainerLifecycle AbstractLifeCycle 2012/8/31 Thomas

OWB-702

Hi, i have already done some refactoring, fixed a bug because passivation removes the bag from the session and added unit tests for the whole failover stuff. I've sent the patch to mark for reviewing first because i didn't dare to create a issue + patch without reviewing :) Should i maybe

Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] release OWB-1.1.6 end of this week?

Hi Mark, it's already fixed but i attached an patch with some refactoring + unittests to #OWB-702. I know that i could commit it but it would be great if anyone could review it :) Regards, Thomas 2012/9/12 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de 2nd try as my previous got eaten by the spam filter :/

Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] release OWB-1.1.6 end of this week?

changes. Sincerely, Joe On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Andraschko zoi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Mark, it's already fixed but i attached an patch with some refactoring + unittests to #OWB-702. I know that i could commit it but it would be great if anyone could review

Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] release OWB-1.1.6 end of this week?

years back. Sincerely, Joe On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Thomas Andraschko zoi...@gmail.com wrote: i know, sorry. Should i deactivate remove trailing spaces in my IDE? 2012/9/12 Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org I started to review the patch, and the changes I saw looked good

Re: [DISCUSS] release OWB-1.1.6 end of this week?

Hi, i will commit today :) Regards, Thomas 2012/9/15 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Hi David! I can roll the release tonight or tomorrow morning. Udo still likes to get a few things done afaik. UnitTests and stuff... Thomas, did you commit all your changes which you have Jiras created

JIRA permissions

Hi, how can i change the assignee of a ticket to myself or mark the issue as fixed? I can't find any button/view for this :) Do i need special permissions? Regards, Thomas

Re: Eclipse/Checkstyle errors

] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.7:check (verify-style) @ openwebbeans-web --- [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.7:check (verify-style) @ openwebbeans-impl --- [INFO] [INFO] etc.. Sincerely, Joe On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Thomas Andraschko zoi...@gmail.com wrote

Re: Eclipse/Checkstyle errors

Bergmark bergm...@apache.org I haven't used the checkstyle plugin for Eclipse, so afraid I can't provide much advice here. Its too bad it doesn't appear to follow the same rules as the maven plugin. Sincerely, Joe On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Thomas Andraschko zoi...@gmail.com wrote

Re: Eclipse/Checkstyle errors

@Override: do we still target j5? *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau* *Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com* 2012/9/16 Thomas Andraschko zoi...@gmail.com I would fix it, that's no problem. We also have many compiler warnings because sometimes @Override is used

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans build tools 1.2

+1 2012/9/16 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans build-tools-1.2. This release is needed for shipping OWB. We just relaxed the method length rules a bit.Maven staging repo:

Re: [VOTE] [take-2] release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.1.6

+1 looks great! :) 2012/9/26 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Hi! I'd again like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.6 . I fixed the issues which stopped our first attempt This is a bugfix release of OpenWebBeans-1.1.x, thus no branch has been created. It mainly

Re: New Maven Module : Failover Cluster

Hi Gurkan, what logic do you mean? The failover logic is in the openwebbeans-web module and it's only used by the web and resource module (StandaloneResourceInjectionService). Regards, Thomas 2012/10/11 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Hello folks In coming days I will be thinking

Re: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ?

Hi Mark, +1 for 1.2.0. Do we completely remove javasisst? If yes, i would like to so some failover refactoring, too. Regards, Thomas 2012/11/10 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Hi folks! Removing functionality from webbeans-impl into an own module + changes in the API might be too big a

Re: December 2012 Board Report

Sorry for off-topic but should i have permissions to open this page? :) 2012/12/10 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com Thanks Mark ;-) 2012/12/10 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Jean Louis Monteiro got added as committer lately (was long time overdue btw ;). LieGrue, strub

Re: December 2012 Board Report

. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Thomas Andraschko zoi...@gmail.com To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Cc: Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 2:38 PM Subject: Re: December 2012 Board Report Sorry for off-topic but should i have permissions to open

Re: new proxy benches

Great improvement, cool! :) 2013/1/15 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de 10 million invocations on 6 different methods each time: with the new proxies + new interceptors: Starting the real bench took: 6530479 (6.5 seconds) with the new proxies + OLD interceptors: Starting the

Re: [VOTE] (take2) Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.1.8

+1 2013/3/18 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com +1 Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Kime: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Gönderildiği Tarih: 17 Mart 2013 19:01 Pazar Konu: [VOTE] (take2) Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.1.8 Hi!

SVN forbidden

Hi, is there something wrong with SVN the last 2 days? I always get following error: svn: MKACTIVITY of '/repos/asf/!svn/act/77db735f-3e01-0010-b369-8b3936c519d7': 403 Forbidden ( http://svn.apache.org) I already tried to delete my eclipse keyring, to enter my user/pw again but somehow i get

Re: SVN forbidden

same :/ 2013/5/1 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com Got some issues too, maybe try svn.us.apache.org Le 1 mai 2013 11:40, Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi, is there something wrong with SVN the last 2 days? I always get following error: svn

Re: SVN forbidden

Still occurs :/ Who should i contact or should i just wait some days? 2013/5/1 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com same :/ 2013/5/1 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com Got some issues too, maybe try svn.us.apache.org Le 1 mai 2013 11:40, Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho

Re: SVN forbidden

@openwebbeans.apache.org Cc: Sent: Thursday, 2 May 2013, 19:36 Subject: Re: SVN forbidden Maybe ask infra Le 2 mai 2013 19:27, Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com a écrit : Still occurs :/ Who should i contact or should i just wait some days? 2013/5/1 Thomas

Re: 1.2.0 release end spurt

Hi Mark, i will try to commit my stuff tomorrow. Hopefully it works, otherwise i must contant infra team first. Regards, Thomas 2013/5/5 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Hi! Gonna try to start with the owb-1.2.0 release on tuesday or so. Please look over the open issues and close what is

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0

Is there already a new snapshot available somewhere? I would try it with my current app. 2013/5/10 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Hi folks! I'll reroll the release this evening. We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source release but we don't ship any binaries for it.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans build-tools 1.3

+1 2013/5/14 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com +1 *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github:

Re: [VOTE] take 3: Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0

+1 2013/5/21 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de +1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Cc: Sent: Sunday, 19 May 2013, 7:49 Subject: [VOTE] take 3: Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0

ClassCastException with CODI and OWB 1.2.0

Hi, today i tried to upgrade OWB from 1.1.5 to 1.2.0 but i get following exception with CODI (1.0.5): java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.jsf2.impl.scope.mapped.Jsf2BeanWrapper cannot be cast to org.apache.webbeans.portable.AnnotatedTypeImpl at

Re: ClassCastException with CODI and OWB 1.2.0

A trunk build works fine! thanks! 2013/9/20 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com Hi Mark, i just tried a maven snapshot but i will try to trunk build on monday :) Regards, Thomas 2013/9/20 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de The latest 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT crashes as well? That's

Re: Documentation layout suggestions

on that as well? Thank you. Might as well try to get it kinda right the first time even though we can update the layout over time ;-) On 1 October 2013 21:14, Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for the second I would only merge the last two points 2013/10/1

Re: Documentation layout suggestions

sorry, i mean subpage - not subpoint 2013/10/1 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com I mean this points: *OpenWebBeans CDI testing framework* • CDI Test Framework Isn' it exactly the same? It the second point a subpoint or what does it mean? 2013/10/1 Karl Kildén karl.kil

Alternative + Named

Hi, should it actually be possible to overwrite a bean with a alternative named bean? e.g - @Named public class A with a activated @Named(a) @Alternative public class A extends B This somehow just works randomly. Every X container startup, the right bean will be used with EL. Thanks.

Re: Alternative + Named

: Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 21:23 Subject: Alternative + Named Hi, should it actually be possible to overwrite a bean with a alternative named bean? e.g - @Named public class

Re: Alternative + Named

the ProcessAnnotatedType.veto(). You could also try to use DeltaSpike globalAlternatives for it. This should do pretty much what you like and internally also works with veto(). LieGrue, strub From: Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com To: dev

1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a bean name

Hi, i just upgraded to 1.2.1 and i get this exception. My @Specialized class does not have a @Named annotation but somehow it's there in the debugger. Any idea? I must still use 1.1.5 :/ Regards, Thomas

Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a bean name

this without inheritance? I never looked deeper in that byte code generation/manipulation stuff. 2013/11/26 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com Hi, i just upgraded to 1.2.1 and i get this exception. My @Specialized class does not have a @Named annotation but somehow it's

Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a bean name

hi thomas, i did a quick-check and don't see the same effect. it would be great, if you provide a small demo which illustrates the issue. regards, gerhard 2013/11/28 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com Guys, i really need your help! It was introduced in one of the ~300

Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a bean name

attach it? LieGrue, strub From: Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 28 November 2013, 13:04 Subject: Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a bean name Hi Gerhard

Re: svn commit: r1552050 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src: main/java/org/apache/webbeans/component/creation/BeanAttributesBuilder.java test/java/org/apache/webbeans/newtests/specalization/mu

(AnnotatedType.isAnnotatationPresent) in case a portable extension has called setAnnotatedType during a ProcessAnnotatedType event and has added @Specializes. On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, i'm not exactly sure if understand

Re: [DISCUSS] retire cditest module?

+1 2014-01-26 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com +1 Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-01-26 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Hi! The

Re: [DISCUSS] drop servlet-2.5 support?

For 2.0/CDI 1.1? +1 then 2014-01-27 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com +1, t8 is almost release so no more need of t6 integration IMO Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github:

Re: time to release owb-1.2.3?

+1 2014-04-21 13:05 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: +1 regards, gerhard 2014-04-21 11:18 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com: Awesome. +1 of course 2014-04-21 11:14 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: +1 works fine on

Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?

+1 for 2.0 for CDI 2.0 don't know about 1.5... 2014-08-30 16:16 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: tomcat does +1 on all major for each spec release (2.5 - 6, 3.0 - 7, 3.1 - 8...) I don't like 1.5 cause it doesn't make any sense but I don't care enough about version to

Re: You shall not pass!

Have some problems... Already created a issue about WEB-INF/beans.xml lookup with a possible fix - please have look at it. I also have a javax.enterprise.inject.UnsatisfiedResolutionException for a bean without a deviration. I will try to find the reason later. 2014-10-02 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas

Re: You shall not pass!

to date since we added few fixes since the announcement Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-10-02 11:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho

Re: You shall not pass!

it is injected? Le jeudi 2 octobre 2014, Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com a écrit : Fixed! :) But i really have a weird problem, i get the follwowing exception on every startup with another bean: javax.enterprise.inject.spi.DeploymentException

Re: You shall not pass!

Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-10-02 14:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com : It worked fine and now, if i start my app, each time another

Re: You shall not pass!

Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-10-05 20:39 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com: Created a small sample here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1022

Re: do we like to drop servlet-2.5 support?

+1 if there is any benefit our last customer with servlet 2.5 switched to TC7 this year 2015-04-26 19:31 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Le 26 avr. 2015 17:51, Joseph Bergmark bergm...@apache.org a écrit : Perhaps I'm being dense, but tomcat 6 is at spec level servlet

Re: a new OWB-1.2.x release?

+1 2015-04-22 14:01 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Hi folks! We got a few requests to ship a new 1.2.x release. If there is no objection then I gonna start with the release process this afternoon. LieGrue, strub

Re: upgrade to java7?

+0 2015-04-09 19:28 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: +0 Le 9 avr. 2015 19:22, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit : Hi! Just became aware that we are still targeting java6 in trunk. But CDI-1.2 is Java7 per spec, so we should imo also upgrade the project to

Re: interceptors and interfaces

+0 but why not? is it a big deal? 2015-06-08 0:39 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Hi guys, in openejb we support EJB without implementation using something like @PartialBean of deltaspike. The issue is then openwebbeans is not able to support interceptors/decorators on

Re: WebContextsService errors when servlet session invalidated during request lifecycle

+1 please create a issue 2015-06-11 1:13 GMT+02:00 Adam Cornett adam.corn...@gmail.com: If the session is invalidated during the processing of the request an exception is thrown when OpenWebBeans is cleaning up. The issue is in the WebContextsService.destroyRequestContext method, which

Re: [VOTE] for Apache OpenWebBeans 1.6.1

+1 tested my application and everything is working fine 2015-06-16 9:10 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn

Re: Unify project names in poms

subjective enough to not do a long thread on this. We just > > need > > > to avoid to change them each week ;). > > > Le 26 oct. 2015 20:52, "Thomas Andraschko" < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > > a > > > écrit : > > >

Re: Unify project names in poms

r.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > 2015-10-26 19:56 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <a

Re: Unify project names in poms

ress.com> | Github < > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > > > > > 2015-10-26 19:56 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko &l

Re: Unify project names in poms

in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > 2015-10-26 19:36 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com > >: > > > Hi, > > > > WDYT about unify the project names in the poms? > > DeltaSpike and MyFaces always prepen

Unify project names in poms

Hi, WDYT about unify the project names in the poms? DeltaSpike and MyFaces always prepends "Apache" and the project name. e.g. Apache MyFaces JSF2.2 Core API Apache MyFaces JSF2.2 Core Impl Apache DeltaSpike Parent Apache DeltaSpike Modules ... In OWB it's: OpenWebBeans Core Tomcat 7 Plugin EL

Re: Bean scanning exclude list

ter/container/openejb-core/src/main/resources/default.exclusions > > Slows down a bit when you dont have the jar but makes a diff when you have > them. > > For owb having a prop in owb.properties is the way I d go. A bit like > tomcat jarSkip property. > Le 23 sept. 2015

Re: svn commit: r1704889 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src/main: java/org/apache/webbeans/config/ java/org/apache/webbeans/corespi/scanner/ resources/META-INF/openwebbeans/

sure, why not. I thought the same but it's actually something like "pathAndJarExclusion". WDYT? 2015-09-23 18:15 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > really a detail but can we name it jarExclusions or something like that? > > beanScanningExcludes sounds close to what we have

Re: svn commit: r1704889 - in /openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-impl/src/main: java/org/apache/webbeans/config/ java/org/apache/webbeans/corespi/scanner/ resources/META-INF/openwebbeans/

t; Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com>

Re: [DISCUSS] board report OWB-2015-12

e currently prepare for new maintenance releases. > > > > ## Health report: > > The project is a container library which is stable and actively > > used and maintained. Due to the fact that most users are using > > OWB as part of another project (e.g. TomE

Re: Object#method and proxies

Hi, shoudln't toString call the original toString method of the contextual instance? 2015-12-18 20:13 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Hi guys, > > ATM we dont proxy methods in Objects (ie normalScope.toString()) will do a > toString on the proxy - see > >

Re: release OWB next week?

+1 2016-02-13 12:56 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1 then we release tomee > Le 13 févr. 2016 12:29, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > > > hi folks! > > > > What else is missing for the release? > > Any tickets you like to get in before I go on and start

Re: moving to owb-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT?

+1 2016-01-31 12:59 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > hi folks! > > While implementing OWB-1107 I had to introduce a subinterface of > ScannerService called ‚BdaScannerService‘ > While OWB deployer works find with both old ScannerService and new > BdaScannerService SPI impls it

Re: moving to owb-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT?

+1 for 1.7 but as romain said, i'm also very sure this is rarely used by users. 2016-01-31 16:26 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > +1 for what? staying with 1.6.x or moving to 1.7.x? > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 31.01.2016 um 13:0

Re: [DISCUSS] moving OpenWebBeans to GIT?

+0 - don't see any big benefit Am Samstag, 23. Januar 2016 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > -0 doesnt bring anything IMO but dont care enough to fight on it > Le 23 janv. 2016 11:59, "Mark Struberg" > > a écrit : > > > Hi! > > > > What do you think about moving

Re: do an OWB release?

+1 2016-07-27 11:37 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1 to go > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Wordpress Blog > | Github < >

Re: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

cool guys! +1 daniel, the patch looks good 2016-07-11 21:51 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha : > Cool! > > I have a patch to update maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin. > I had work on some changes on branch cdi-2.0 and I get some problems with > java8. > > It's

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.2

+1 2017-02-19 16:27 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > up? we still miss 1 binding vote > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github

Re: do an OWB release?

any news? :) 2016-07-27 16:38 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek : > +1 for a release! > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2016-07-27 10:47 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > > > Hi! > > > > Are there anything we need before shipping the next owb release? > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.0 - take 2

+1 - my applications are working fine 2016-09-01 10:50 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > dont care much of digits but +1 to just move forward and not reuse failed > release numbers > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog >

Re: do an OWB release?

or the ones > > you like to see fixed? > > > > After that it's just a matter of an hour to make the release. > > That's pretty easy. I can do it, but if anybody likes to jump in I'm fine > > as well. > > > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > >

Re: [microwave] name selection

press.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > > > 2016-10-31 13:26 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho.

Re: [microwave] name selection

if possible legally, microwave is a cool name! :) 2016-10-31 12:19 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Hi guys, > > I quite like microwave name but have 2 questions on it: > > 1- is it fine legally speaking? we all think to the kitchen probably but > this one would be ok

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.1

+1 2017-01-02 16:52 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github rmannibucau> |

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.3

+1 2017-04-16 12:06 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1, thanks Mark > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome John D Ament as Apache OpenWebBeans committer

Welcome! :) 2017-10-06 9:47 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Good morning ladies and gents! > > Due to his contributions in the CDI SE area of OWB, the Apache > OpenWebBeans PMC has invited John to become a fellow committer to the > project. > > > Welcome, John! > Thanks for your

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.3

+1 2017-12-21 11:17 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > +1 > > Jean-Louis > > Le mer. 20 déc. 2017 à 16:02, Mark Struberg a > écrit : > > > Hi folks! > > > > I did run all steps to release OWB-2.0.3. > > > > We fixed the following bugs and

Re: org.apache.webbeans.container.InjectionResolver.fastMatching = false?

Then -1 to set it as default :D Romain Manni-Bucau schrieb am So., 12. Aug. 2018, 15:36: > Without. Any generic injection is broken in any project and de are not spec > compliant without that flag. > > Not sure it does worth having our default for most apps but i know for very > big ones it

[perf] cache observers in NotificationManager#resolveObservers

Hi, as you already may know from the TomEE/BVal mailing list, i'm not happy with the startup performance since TomEE8. TomEE7 OWB startup ~ 4,5seconds TomEE8 OWB startup ~ 9seconds i finally managed to improve the performance on 2 places. 1) Filter framework classes in BVal on PAT Reduces

Re: [perf] cache observers in NotificationManager#resolveObservers

ok, will provide a better patch on monday! Am Fr., 12. Okt. 2018 um 16:44 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > We can surely clean it up after startup but looks good > > Le ven. 12 oct. 2018 17:16, Thomas Andraschko > > a écrit : > > > Hi, &

Re: [perf] cache observers in NotificationManager#resolveObservers

t; E.g. ProcessAnnotatedType vs ProcessAnnotatedType > And one type layer down > ProcessAnnotatedType> vs > ProcessAnnotatedType> > > If we don't have this kind of test yet then we should add one. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 15.10.2018 um 11:23 schrieb Thomas Andraschko <

Re: 2.0.8 release?

obably do a release on the weekend? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 17.10.2018 um 15:21 schrieb Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > WDYT about releasing 2.0.8? > > We have 2 good performance improvement

2.0.8 release?

Hi Mark, WDYT about releasing 2.0.8? We have 2 good performance improvements, ASM7 update and some bug fixes. I think it's not a bad time for a release + we can push the new release to TomEE? TomEE-M1 + 2.0.8 improves the startup of TomEE, compared to the TomEE SNAPSHOT last week, up to ~2,5

Re: 2.0.8 release?

> < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > Le mer. 17 oct. 2018 à 15:45, Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > > a écrit : > > > >> Weekend is of cou

Re: 2.0.8 release?

| Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-developm

Re: 2.0.8 release?

; | Book > > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > Le mer. 24 oct. 2018 à 14:02, Mark Struberg > a > > écrit : > > > >> Gimme a day to check with my apps please. > >> &

Re: 2.0.8 release?

awerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8

> > > Am Mi., 7. Nov. 2018 um 17:40 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8 > > > > The following tickets got resolved: > > >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8 CDI container

It’s a great pleasure to announce the release of Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8 Apache OpenWebBeans-2.x is a CDI container (Contexts and Dependency Injection for Java) and targets the CDI-2.0 specification (JavaEE 8). This is a maintenance release targeting the new CDI 2.0 specification! CDI is a

[ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8 CDI container

It’s a great pleasure to announce the release of Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8 Apache OpenWebBeans-2.x is a CDI container (Contexts and Dependency Injection for Java) and targets the CDI-2.0 specification (JavaEE 8). This is a maintenance release targeting the new CDI 2.0 specification! CDI is a

Re: 2.0.8 release?

Its released and upgraded now, right!? Am Mo., 29. Okt. 2018, 17:33 hat Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> geschrieben: > ahh ok, so lets wait :) > > Am Mo., 29. Okt. 2018 um 17:29 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > >> i

[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8

Hi all, I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8 The following tickets got resolved: Bug [OWB-1257] - Conditional exclusion of beans in beans.xml does not honor system property [OWB-1263] - Generic observers not called correctly [OWB-1264] - Observers method

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.8

<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-developmen

Re: OWB release for Java 11?

I released 2.0.8 today with those changes ;) Am Mo., 12. Nov. 2018, 20:29 hat Jean-Louis MONTEIRO geschrieben: > Hey guys, > > As you may have noticed, I am trying to push the Java 11 compatibility > forward. See TomEE mailing list. > > I have noticed Romain upgraded ASM to ASM 7 and XBean to

  1   2   3   4   5   >