2020-02-13 01:12:11 UTC - Kostis Kaffes: Hello there, is there any
documentation regarding the different schemas Openwhisk stores in CouchDB?
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1581556331238100?thread_ts=1581556331.238100&cid=C3TPCAQG1
2020-02-13 02:02:33 UTC - Dominic Kim:
Hi all, I submitted a PR with a number of changes to ActionLoop proxy.
I ensured it is backward compatible, so all the new features are enabled
explicty with environment variables.
There is a document now that lists all the features.
The most important feature is now that the proxy can require
+1 to release openwhisk-runtime-rust rc2. rcverify log appended.
PMC members, I need one more +1 vote to be able to close this vote and proceed
with a release.
thanks,
--dave
daves-mbp:tools dgrove$ ./rcverify.sh openwhisk-runtime-rust 'OpenWhisk Runtime
Rust' 1.0.0 rc2
rcverify.sh (script SH
Yes I have a big advantage, in the fact I control the proxy.
I read your documentation and from what I see it works in a very similar way:
you "decorate" the action with your own action, while I am actually working at
the proxy level. But for the rest the concept is similar: create a tunnel to
+1 for 'OpenWhisk Runtime Rust' 1.0.0 rc2
Validated with rcverify.sh (script SHA1: 2F4E A973 5857 EDF6 39BD E2F6 ABE0
C9FB 5837 B2AC)
No anomalies with rc2 :)
Regards,
Rob
> On 14 Feb 2020, at 15:30, Dave Grove wrote:
>
> +1 to release openwhisk-runtime-rust rc2. rcverify log appended
Legal questions about licensing can be submitted to the LEGAL Jira project
by the way.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 09:33 Michele Sciabarra
wrote:
> Yes I have a big advantage, in the fact I control the proxy.
> I read your documentation and from what I see it works in a very similar
> way: you "deco
About ngrok
I have being using inlets as an alternative to ngrok and the license is MIT
which is good one.
https://github.com/inlets/inlets
- Carlos Santana
@csantanapr
> On Feb 14, 2020, at 10:33 AM, Michele Sciabarra wrote:
>
> Yes I have a big advantage, in the fact I control the prox
This vote is now closed. It passed with 3 +1 binding votes (rabbah, allen,
grove) and no
other votes cast. I will proceed with making this release.
--dave
On 2020/02/10 16:57:30, "David P Grove" wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a call to vote on releasing version 1.0.0 release candidate rc2 o
Hi,
I'm sure there's a bit of release voting fatigue, but this is the last one
of our runtime wave...
Please be sure to update your version of rcverify before voting. The
script needed a tweak to not flag a directory called "node_modules" in the
runtime-nodejs tests/dat/* tree as a violation.
+1 to release 'OpenWhisk Runtime Node.js' 1.15.0 rc1
Verified with rcverify.sh (script SHA1: D609 C322 4B79 A4A7 642C C41F 14A3
F50B 2412 CD01)
Looks good here.
Regards,
Rob
> On 14 Feb 2020, at 21:20, David P Grove wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm sure there's a bit of release voting fatigue
+1 to release Apache OpenWhisk Runtime Node.js (v1.15.0, rc1).
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository.
[x]
11 matches
Mail list logo