+1
I was able to verify the release artifacts for client-js 3.19 rc1
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] DISCLAIMER is included.
[x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each O
Hello Everyone：
I submited a WIP patch: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4790 here
Sometimes, admin may want to reinitalize the runtime config, e.g. nodejs:10
prewarm container number is less, lead to cold start, in order to handle user's
request as soon as possible,
admin may want to
Hi, guys
I wrote a pr here: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4870
this pr's target: make prewarmedPool as `already consumed memory
resources`, this pr has an benefit that if consider prewarmedPool as consumed
memory resource, can aovid to do much `cold start a container` when t
Hi, guys.
this pr was implemented long time ago:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4058
this pr's target is `Add protect feature to avoid update or delete actions`
There several points, i want to discuss
1. Which entity need to be protected when update or delete?
Hi, guys.
I wrote a pr here(Adjust prewarm container dynamically):
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4058
This feature is disabled by default. if want to use it, can add some extra
configuration in runtimes.json as below
"stemCells": [
{
"initialCount"
ntime.
-Original Message-
From: "甯尤刚"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: 2020/4/28周二 08:32 (GMT+08:00)
Subject: Adjust prewarm container dynamically
Hi, guys.
I wrote a pr here(Adjust prewarm container dynamically):
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4058
This feature is disabled by d
think the goal is to protect accidental
updates as well.
To make this incremental, the first set of permissions could just about to
read and write from the owner only. I need to look at the PR again to see
how this was implemented. Is it good enough for now?
-r
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:27 PM 甯尤
Hi, guys
this is the feature: Adjust prewarm container dynamically:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4871
Currently, this pr is close to done.
I look forward to receiving your guys's feedback, thanks!
Hi, guys,
Due to this pr (Adjust prewarm container dynamically):
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4871 is merged
I think it is a good chance to add this feature: take prewarmed container's
memory as used memory: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4911
for master branch, i
specified permission, e.g.
already explicitly specified for theSharedUserA, so theSharedUserA's permission
is
```
"theSharedUserA": {
"read" : yes
"execute": yes
}
```
I also wrote it here:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4058#i
Hi, guys
Currently, openwhisk supports return json object only,
I wrote a POEM in openwhisk upstream that allows user to write their own action
which supports array result. e.g. already implmeneted in my local env for
python, worked well
```
def main(args):
not any other type? And how does
composition work in that case?
I'm not saying we shouldn't consider this but rather that it's a bit more
involved.
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 8:50 PM 甯尤刚 wrote:
> Hi, guys
>
> Currently, openwhisk supports return json object only,
> I
7; + lines);
lines.sort();
return lines;
}
```
-Original Message-----
From: "甯尤刚"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: 2022/5/25周三 11:13 (GMT+08:00)
Subject: Re: [discuss] provide array result
Hi, Rabbah, good question.
1. Why stop at array, why not any other type?
dictionary and array are very com
Hi, dear openwhiskers.
Then, all runtimes except ballerina image have supported `An action supports
not only a JSON object but also a JSON array`, and supports sequence action as
well.
One important part is, only swift image's main signature has been changed
from `func main(args: Any) ->
Dear all: below PR is a breaking change, so i need to inform everyone to
know this thing https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2595
Currently, for Benchmarks tests, there has below env:
"DEFAULTLIMITS_ACTIONS_INVOKES_PERMINUTE": "{{
defaultLimits.actions.invo
Dear all: this pr:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2595 will be merged two days
later, so please prepare migration for that.
1.The whole statement like this,
$OPENWHISK_HOME/bin/wsk property set -i --apihost --auth
--namespace -vvv
your statment seems lack of apihost, namespace...
2.Can debug the controller in your local idea IDE or find more logs?
-Original Message-
From: "
+1
-Original Message-
From: "Carlos Santana"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: 2018-02-14 (星期三) 02:57:05
Subject: Re: Hot standby controller
+1
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 8:05 AM Christian Bickel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some time ago, we started working on the scale out of the controllers.
> One of our first st
here is the patch: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4225
-Original Message-
From: "蒋鹏程"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: 2019-01-22 (星期二) 11:27:56
Subject: [discuss]Operation-invoker side-change prewarm container
### Background
I think openwhisk needs some operation tools(page or API) t
This morning, my email has some problem , i used my colleague's mail to send
the email.
I resubscribe the maillist, can send email successfully now.
I hope everyone will actively discuss and give suggestion.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: "甯尤刚"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: 2019
Background #
I think openwhisk needs some operation tools(page or API) to admin, for example:
real-time status of Action, Controller, Invoker, etc.
Change prewarm runtime container for invokers
here, we just discuss Change prewarm container for invokers
Requirements #
Admin can add/delete extra
here is the patch: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4225
-Original Message-
From: "蒋鹏程"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: 2019-01-22 (星期二) 11:27:56
Subject: [discuss]Operation-invoker side-change prewarm container
### Background
I think openwhisk needs some operation tools(page or API)
here is the patch: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4225
-Original Message-
From: "蒋鹏程"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: 2019-01-22 (星期二) 11:27:56
Subject: [discuss]Operation-invoker side-change prewarm container
### Background
I think openwhisk needs some operation tools(page or API) t
As more and more production system uses openwhisk,
It seems we need some feature to protect their service safe from mistake.
for example, when users create action use like below(add annotation "lock":true)
curl -X PUT -H "Content-type: application/json" --user
23bc46b1-71f6-4ed5-8c54-816aa4f8c50
Hi all,
I think it is necessary to support heterogeneous invoker cluster.
For example, users might need GPU enabled host, and users might expect more
powerful hosts or dedicated resources with higher prices.
Or OW operator(public cloud) might want to deploy invoker in many different
types of hos
25 matches
Mail list logo
