Re: apreq release

That was my knee-jerk reaction, too, but after digging, I saw that win32 really shouldn't be affected. On 11/16/2016 4:09 PM, Steve Hay wrote: > On 15 November 2016 at 09:26, Issac Goldstand wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Someone (finally) noticed that apreq's test suite isn't

Re: apreq release

Yes, if we go through with this. The mod_apreq2 stuff is in httpd. However I just realized that although it's been in trunk for years now, it's never been backported to the 2.4.x branch. I'm not sure why, and my google-fu isn't finding relevant discussion on dev@httpd. When I initially took a

Re: apreq release

On 15 November 2016 at 09:26, Issac Goldstand wrote: > Hi all, > > Someone (finally) noticed that apreq's test suite isn't compatible with > Apache 2.4 and requested a change. Given that we haven't released an > updated apreq in nearly 6 years, I'm inclined to make/test the

Re: apreq release

Given that the C was (finally) merged into httpd years ago, and given that there are no proposed code changes, I'd say that's not such a bad idea... I've become a bit rusty in Perl (and even with apreq) over the years, but IIRC, all of the Perl glue is in

Re: apreq release

Honestly, I've no clue. The plan is just to add a few checks with mod_version (if available) to deal with the 2.2/2.4 config syntax changes, and the changes so far seem to only be in the test suite. I haven't hit any changes in libapreq itself yet. I don't have any connection with the Debian

Re: apreq release

Good news!! No idea why apreq hasn't just been merged into mod_perl after all these years. A+++ On Nov 15, 2016 3:27 AM, "Issac Goldstand" wrote: > Hi all, > > Someone (finally) noticed that apreq's test suite isn't compatible with > Apache 2.4 and requested a change.