Congrats Josh!!
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Marek Wiewiorka
wrote:
> Congrats!
> 8 kwi 2016 6:57 PM "Josh Mahonin" napisał(a):
>
> > Welcome aboard and congrats (fellow) Josh!
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:52 PM, James Taylor
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I
ay 3, 2016, 8:01 PM Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> >
> > > Nice work Ankit, congrats!
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2016, James Taylor wrote:
> > >
> > > > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm pleased to announce that
> Ankit
> > > >
And , also look at the dynamic column support.
https://phoenix.apache.org/dynamic_columns.html
You don't need to specify all the columns at the time of create view and
you can still query other columns by specifying them during the query.
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Sergey Soldatov
wrote:
I'd like to volunteer for 4.8 release as Rajesh needs to take care some
personal work.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:28 AM, James Taylor
wrote:
> +1. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. Likely will be some perf improvements too that
> Samarth, Thomas, and I are working on.
>
> James
>
> On Wednesday, March 2
nts[4]
- Offset support for paging queries[5]
- 50+ Bugs resolved[6]
- Support for HBase v1.2
What else we can get in ? Is there something being actively worked upon but
it will not be ready by proposed date?
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1734
[2]
rg/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535
> > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2267
> > > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-258
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Ankit Singhal
> > wrote:
> > >
Hi,
As now the Jiras which needs to go in 4.8 are either done or have +1s on
them. so how about having RC by Thursday EOD?
Checked with Rajesh too , PHOENIX-1734 is also ready for 4.x branches and
will be committed by tomorrow.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Nick
Hi Anupama,
Option 1:-
You can create a ASYNC index so that WAL can be replayed. And once your
regions are up , remember to do the flush of data table before dropping the
index.
Option 2:-
Create a table in hbase with the same name as index table name by using
hbase shell.
Regards,
Ankit
Yes, restart your cluster
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:17 AM, anupama agarwal wrote:
> I have created async index with same name. But I am still getting the same
> error. Should I restart my cluster for changes to reflect?
> On Jun 15, 2016 8:38 PM, "Ankit Singhal" wro
Hi All,
Changing the date for RC on Monday instead of Today. As following JIRAs
still needs to get in.
PHOENIX-3001(NPE during split on table with deleted local Indexes.
PHOENIX-2940(Remove Stats RPC from meta table build lock)
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Ankit
Thanks James and Lars.
Now we are waiting on two issues:-
PHOENIX-3002
PHOENIX-3020
It seems both have fixes ready , probably will be committed by tomorrow.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:04 PM, wrote:
> PHOENIX-3014, PHOENIX-3012 have been pushed. Good to go on th
conf)
PHOENIX-3018 (Write local updates to region than HTable in master branch)
PHOENIX-2902 (Adjust PhoenixDatabaseMetadata#getSchemas query if namespaces
are enabled)
Let me know if anything else is missed.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Ankit Singhal
wrote:
> Yes
will be able to do this by Monday only as I and Rajesh are in transit
for 2 days.
I think we can target Tuesday as RC date.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:02 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> How we looking for the RC?
>
> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain wrote:
>
>
%204.8.0%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC
@dev, please add if anything else is blocker for 4.8.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:30 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> @Ankit - Can we move all non blocking issues marked for 4.8 to 4.9 too?
> Here's a link to the 97 open JIRAs for 4.8:
I can see src/it directories in eclipse with fresh imports as well.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Maryann Xue wrote:
> Same here.
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:47 AM, James Taylor
> wrote:
>
> > Anyone else seeing this issue? When I import the projects into Eclipse, I
> > no longer see the sr
rc/it directories, can you let us know
> > your Eclipse version and any tricks/steps?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Ankit Singhal
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I can see src/it directories in eclipse with fresh imports as well.
&g
Thanks Rajesh. As now all blockers for 4.8 are resolved. Let me bring the
RC soon.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:10 AM, rajeshb...@apache.org <
chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have committed the upgrade related blockers.
>
> Thanks,
> Rajeshbabu.
,
Ankit Singhal
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, James Taylor
wrote:
> What's left now? Is PHOENIX-3063 really a blocker? Is someone working on
> it? Is it a regression? What about PHOENIX-3045?
>
> Are these the only two?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at
gt; On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal wrote:
>
> > PHOENIX-3063 is committed in 0.98 branch.
> > After PHOENIX-3061 , IndexTool tests started failing. Need to check
> whether
> > the patch is actually causing the error or this fix has uncovered some
> old
> &g
nows of any other blockers.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > James
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:17 AM, James Taylor >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Yes, just noticed. I'm looking at
Yes, it is already committed.. I'll try to get the RC today.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:43 PM, James Taylor
wrote:
> Ok - would it be possible to get an RC up today once PHOENIX-3021 is
> checked in?
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Ankit Singhal
> wrote:
>
> >
It's ok James , I would be able to cut RC today.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:24 PM, James Taylor
wrote:
> If you don't have time today, Ankit (as its getting late in India) perhaps
> Mujtaba may be able to cut the RCs this morning US time?
>
> On Wednesday, July 13, 2016,
Hello Everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.8.0-HBase-0.98 RC0. This is
the next minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with Apache HBase 0.98+.
The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary
release.
This release has feature parity with our other pendi
Hello Everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.8.0-HBase-1.1 RC0. This is
the next minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with Apache HBase 1.1.
The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary
release.
This release has feature parity with our other pending
Hello Everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.8.0-HBase-1.2 RC0. This is
the next minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with Apache HBase 1.2.
The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary
release.
This release has feature parity with our other pending
Hello Everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.8.0-HBase-1.0 RC0. This is
the next minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with Apache HBase 1.0.
The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary
release.
This release has feature parity with our other pending
Hi Vasanth,
RC for 4.8(with support of hbase-1.2) is just out today, you can try with
the latest build.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Vasanth Bhat wrote:
> Thanks James.
>
> When are the early builds going to be available for Phoenix
> 4.8.0
Delay release till ported automation discussed above is in
place.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
I tried porting the great work done by Sean on HBASE-14085
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14085> to fix LICENSE and
NOTICE issue in Phoenix but there are many dependencies(direct or
t
sions
> >
> > https://github.com/jmahonin/docker-phoenix/tree/phoenix_spark
> > https://github.com/sequenceiq/docker-phoenix
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:14 AM, James Taylor
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1. Great work on the release, everyone!
&
, everyone!
> > > >
> > > > James
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:42 PM, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding).
> > > > > Compiled from source. Loaded about 100m rows, queried, flus
gt; >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:13 AM, James Taylor <
> jamestay...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1. Great work on the release, everyone!
> > > > >
> > > > > James
> > > >
7;t viable. Getting IP right in a release is fundamental.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Josh Elser
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Sean Busbey wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Ankit Singha
Yes, I'll cut the RC today. @James/Josh, how about the licensing issues
with tracing UI, should we include it in release or not?
@dev, please commit the following JIRAs ASAP.
PHOENIX-3109
PHOENIX-3098
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 7:46 AM, James Taylor
wrote:
> How
:12 PM, Ankit Singhal
wrote:
> Yes, I'll cut the RC today. @James/Josh, how about the licensing issues
> with tracing UI, should we include it in release or not?
>
> @dev, please commit the following JIRAs ASAP.
> PHOENIX-3109
> PHOENIX-3098
>
> Regards,
> Ankit Si
Moving PHOENIX-3111 to 4.8.1 as per discussion with Rajeshbabu. Let me know
if someone thinks it's important for 4.8.0.
Now currently, the only outstanding blocker for 4.8.0 is PHOENIX-3113 and
which has a simple fix. So, by tomorrow morning IST, we should have RC1 out.
Regards,
Ankit Si
Let's discuss if someone has any concerns.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 2:19 PM, wrote:
> Also, can we branch 4.8-x in git?That way bigger changes can still go into
> the 4.x branches, while bugs are fixed in 4.8-x branches.
> -- Lars
>
> From:
in master and
4.x branches now.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Ankit Singhal
wrote:
> Ok, Given that 4.8.0 RC is taking time , we can fork 4.8-HBase-x.y
> branches so that new features and bugs target for future releases(4.9+) can
> be committed in 4.x branches a
I think PHOENIX-3111 is not completed yet. Expecting the addendum soon,
once it is committed ,I'll get the RC up.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 7:29 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Are we ready for a new RC yet?
>
> Shouldn't we bump the 4.x and master branch to 4.9.0-HBase**-SNAPSHOT? I
> >>> just noticed that we have the same Maven versions on both the 4.8 and
> 4.x
> >>> branch sets.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Ankit Singhal wrote:
> >>
Hello Everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.8.0 RC1. This is the next
minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with Apache HBase 0.98,1.0, 1.1 &
1.2.
The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience
binary release
for each supported HBase version.
This release has
yes, I'll do it by my EOD.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:11 PM, James Taylor
wrote:
> Didn't get a chance to do this today, so if someone else can take them,
> that'd be much appreciated.
>
> On Wednesday, August 3, 2016, James Taylor wrote:
>
> > Unless anyone has objections, I'd like to do the ab
Sorry for the churn.. we need to get PHOENIX-3156 and PHOENIX-3149 in 4.8. I'll
be cutting new RC with fixes by tomorrow morning IST.
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 8:20 AM, wrote:
> -1
> Sorry. See PHOENIX-3156. My doing.
> -- Lars
>
> From: Ankit Singhal
> To: dev@pho
Hello Everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.8.0 RC2. This is the next
minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with Apache HBase 0.98,1.0, 1.1 &
1.2.
The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience
binary release
for each supported HBase version.
The previous RC
+1 ,
- Ran some tests related to namespace and upgrade utility
- Ran some manual tests related to Indexes, WAL recovery, offset feature,
stats etc
- Tested simple upgrade from older versions(v4.6, v4.7)
- check backward compatibility of client v4.7
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at
The vote for the release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.0 RC2 is now closed and has
passed with 6 binding +1s and no 0 or -1s:
James Taylor*
Lars Hofhansl*
Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla*
Thomas D'Silva*
Samarth Jain*
Ankit Singhal*
Josh Elser+
*=binding
+= voted with non-binding vote but is announced a
+1
-- Tested for any namespace mapping regression from 4.11 to 4.12.
-- Upgrade from 4.11 to 4.12 is fine (vigilant testing, as we don't have
upgrade code this time)
-- Confirmed backward compatibility (Able to connect and do CRUD operations
with 4.11 client).
-- UT/ITs came clean.
On Mon, Oc
Congratulations, Vincent!!
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome, Vincent.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:51 PM, James Taylor
> wrote:
>
> > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm delighted to announce that
> Vincent
> > Poon has accepted our i
Congratulations, Ethan!!
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome, Ethan.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:45 PM, James Taylor
> wrote:
>
> > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm please to announce that Ethan
> Wang
> > has accepted our invitation
OLUMN_SIZE from system.catalog where TABLE_NAME='G1V3IN_ADITI' and
TABLE_SCHEM is NULL and COLUMN_NAME='INVOICE' and COLUMN_FAMILY='SBNUM';
Note:- you may need to restart the region servers and the clients to
refresh the cache holding metadata.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
O
Agreed James.. Thanks Josh for renaming it.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Just went ahead and did it. No problem from my POV.
>
>
> On 10/31/17 1:54 PM, James Taylor wrote:
>
>> I propose we rename the 5.0-HBase-2.0 branch to 5.x-HBase-2.0 so that we
>> can do all 5.x based
Yes, James, There are JIRAs(if not all) which are expected to be ported to
master soon like the JIRAs under
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4297. but as sometimes we
need a separate patch for HBase 2.0 and 1.x branch, which was delaying the
process of getting 5.x in a compiled state
Congrats and welcome, Pedro!
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:35 AM, Flavio Pompermaier
wrote:
> Congratulations and thans for the great work!
>
> On 30 Jan 2018 23:45, "James Taylor" wrote:
>
> On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm please to announce that Pedro
> Boado has accepted our invitation
+1
- All the tests are passing(except 2 which are flaky and can be ignored).
- Tested some basic and complex queries on cluster with large data - Ok
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Sergey Soldatov
wrote:
> Tested with basic scenarios with a heavy load to salted/unsalted tables.
> Looks stabl
ython-phoenixdb
[3] *https://github.com/Pirionfr/pyPhoenix
<https://github.com/Pirionfr/pyPhoenix>*
*[4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4636
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4636>*
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:30 AM, James Taylor
wrote:
>
27;t
> >> know what, if any, infrastructure exists to distribute Python modules.
> >> https://packaging.python.org/glossary/#term-built-distribution
> >>
> >> I feel like a sub-directory in the phoenix repository would be the
> >> easiest to make this w
welcome to review the code and we look
forward to working with the community to develop this code further in the
future.
Thanks,
Ankit Singhal
+1
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Sergey Soldatov
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:23 PM, James Taylor
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> >
> > > Nothing sensitive in this quarter's report, so sending out to the dev@
> > > list for everyone
+1
* Upgrade from 4.13 to 4.14 (with HBase 1.2) - Verified
* Namespace mapping upgrade and mapping utility to map existing table - No
regression
* Query logging - verified
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Mujtaba Chohan wrote:
> +1.
>
> Verified backward compat. and performance looks fine when
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4785 seems to be a blocker
for the release.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:37 AM rajeshb...@apache.org <
chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC0. This is the next
> major release
> of Pho
Congrats Vincent!!
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 6:30 AM rajeshb...@apache.org <
chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congratulations Vincent!!
>
>
> Thanks,
> Rajeshbabu.
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Purtell
> wrote:
>
> >
Congrats Pedro!!
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 6:29 AM rajeshb...@apache.org <
chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congratulations, Pedro!!
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Purtell >
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations, Pedro!
> >
&
Congrats Ohad!!
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 6:30 AM rajeshb...@apache.org <
chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congratulations Ohad!!
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Andrew Purtell >
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations and welcome, Ohad!
>
+1 (binding)
* Build from src - OK
* Enabled namespace mapping and check migration:- OK (not regressed)
* Created some views and local/global indexes - OK
* Unit tests - ALL are PASSING
* Query logging - OK
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:03 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Noticed that the
+1
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:22 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> +1
>
> On 7/9/18 7:03 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Vincent Poon
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This is a call to vote on stopping maintenance of both the
> 4.x-HBase-0.98
> >> and 4.x-HBase-1.1 branches.
> >>
you can check if HADOOP_HOME and JAVA_HOME are properly set in the
environment.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:23 AM William Shen
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm trying to set up the Jenkins job at work to build Phoenix and run the
> integration tests. However, repeatedly I encounter issues with the h
Congratulations and Welcome, Geoffrey!!
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 6:36 PM Jaanai Zhang wrote:
> Congratulations Geoffrey!
>
>
>Jaanai Zhang
>Best regards!
>
>
>
> Abhishek Singh Chouhan 于2019年4月10日周三
> 上午4:50写道：
>
> > Congrats Geoffrey!!
> >
> > On
Congratulations, Cheng Lei!!
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 6:35 PM Jaanai Zhang wrote:
> Congratulations Cheng!
>
>
>Jaanai Zhang
>Best regards!
>
>
>
> Geoffrey Jacoby 于2019年4月10日周三 上午5:03写道：
>
> > Congratulations, Cheng!
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at
Congratulations and Welcome Mihir !!
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 5:49 PM Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Congratulations Mihir.
>
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 5:42 PM Thomas D'Silva wrote:
>
> > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I am pleased to announce that
> > Mihir Monani has accepted our invitation to
+1
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 4:44 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> +1
>
> On 5/10/19 4:28 PM, Thomas D'Silva wrote:
> > Since HBase 1.2 is now end of life and we are creating a new branch to
> > support HBase-1.5(PHOENIX-5277), I think we should drop the HBase-1.2
> > branches. What do folks think?
> >
> >
Apache Phoenix enables OLTP and operational analytics for Hadoop through
SQL support and integration with other projects in the ecosystem such as
Spark, HBase, Pig, Flume, MapReduce and Hive.
We're pleased to announce our 4.8.0 release which includes:
- Local Index improvements[1]
- Integration wi
Hi Onkar,
you may follow below pull request as some other users have also posted
their errors and workaround. you may correlated with the ones you are
seeing in logs.
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/202
Regards
Ankit Singhal
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Onkar Kadam wrote:
>
&
Congratulations and welcome, Kevin!!
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Congrats, Kevin!
>
>
> James Taylor wrote:
>
>> On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Kevin
>> Liew has accepted our invitation to become a committer on the Apache
>> Phoenix pro
How about not sending the IndexMaintainers from the client and prepare them
at the server itself and cache/refresh it per table like we do currently
for PTable?
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> If anyone is interested, I did hack on this some more over the weekend.
>
> https:
If MapR is shipping HBase without much change to the internal API, then
binary of Phoenix corresponding to their HBase version is expected to work.
AFAIK, Phoenix is not yet supported with MapR M7 Edition. but it is still
better to check with them directly.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:44 AM, 刘 强 wro
SYSTEM tables are shared among tenants, if you want to control access for
SYSTEM tables to a particular tenant then you should define ACLs at HBase
level only.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:23 AM, 天真 <416158...@qq.com> wrote:
> If a phoenix's multi-tenant + kerberos is used to authorize one of the
> t
It has been assumed that your Phoenix tenants are mapped to an
authenticated users.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Ankit Singhal
wrote:
> SYSTEM tables are shared among tenants, if you want to control access for
> SYSTEM tables to a particular tenant then you should define ACLs at
Congratulations and welcome Cheng Lei !!
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:26 PM, James Taylor
wrote:
> On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Cheng Lei
> has accepted our invitation to become a committer on the Apache Phoenix
> project. He's done an excellent job isolating a
Below article may help:-
https://community.hortonworks.com/articles/808/phoenix-jdbc-client-setup.html#comment-7308
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Natnapat Rachataviwat <
natnapa...@g-able.com> wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> I’m using phoenix java api version 4.6 on hbase 1.1.2. and use
t;>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Nick Dimiduk <
> >>> ndimi...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the contributions Ankit, and congratulations!
> &g
ion at cf level in first
guide post only.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Maryann Xue wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the answer, James! The data size has well exceeded the
> guidepost width and the guideposts do exist but without corresponding
> "rowCount" o
t; On Friday, February 12, 2016, Ankit Singhal
> wrote:
>
> > but I think we need these metrics at cf only right as per this comment-
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2143?focusedCommentId=15069779&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabp
Is that the way it's working? If not, let's file a JIRA please.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Maryann Xue
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you, Ankit! I see what you mean. But I think what I queried was the
> > default CF. SchemaUtil.getEm
PHOENIX-3726 could be a blocker for this release.
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:40 AM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.10.0 RC0. This is the next
> minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with Apache HBase 0.98, 1.1 & 1.2.
> The release includes
Congratulations Chinmay !!
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 1:33 PM Thomas D'Silva wrote:
> Congrats Chinmay, well deserved!
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:00 AM Vincent Poon
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats, Chinmay!
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:34 AM Geoffrey Jacoby
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Each Apache proj
+1
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:44 AM Andrew Purtell wrote:
> +0 (binding)
>
> I support this but it isn't my time I'd be committing to maintaining the
> new repos with a +1...
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:27 AM Josh Elser wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As was previously discussed[1][2], there is a mo
Congratulations Gokcen!
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:08 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome, Gokcen!
>
> On 2/10/20 1:55 PM, Geoffrey Jacoby wrote:
> > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Gokcen
> > Iskender has accepted our invitation to become a commi
certain section of JIRAs where they want to
actively contribute with the reviews and ideas.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 2:13 PM Istvan Toth wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Phoenix has been split into sub projects, and adopted some projects, so I
> think that it is time to reflect
tml#hbase.versioning
[4]
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/8-compatibility-guide-2156366.html#A999387
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
Thanks, Istvan for putting up a detailed plan
+1 for removing twill(as I can see it is recently moved to Attic) and
adding whatever convenience it's bringing in Omid/tephra project itself.
Instead of creating a shaded artifact of Guava and then refer it in Omid
and Tephra, can't we just short-cir
et of commits which brings back this shim layer,
instead can use the tag and go with it.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:04 AM Geoffrey Jacoby wrote:
> The HBase community has just unanimously EOLed HBase 1.3.
>
> As I recall, 1.3 has some significant differences with 1.4
Sounds good to me.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:48 AM Istvan Toth wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We have been using phoenix-thirdparty snapshots in omid for a few weeks,
> and in phoenix (master) for about a week, and so far we haven't found any
> issues stemming from using Phoenix-thirdparty (effectively thirdp
825203A70405BC83AECF5F7D97351C1B794433C7
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:05 AM Istvan Toth wrote:
> Please vote on this Apache phoenix-thirdparty release candidate,
> phoenix-thirdparty-1.0.0RC0
>
> The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package
r
those users who rely on these features to wait for a future release?
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 8:21 PM cheng...@apache.org
wrote:
>
>
>
> In my opinion, we should keep releases light and frequent, and for some
> unusual query bugs like RVC and DESC
> we c
to be updated in NOTICE file)
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 2:04 AM Viraj Jasani wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> * Build from source: ok
> * Signature: ok
> * Rat-check: ok
> * All unit tests in tephra passed
> * Build Phoenix master with 0.16.0RC2: ok
>
&g
stead
of dragging them with unknown stability.
Regards,
Ankit Singhal
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 7:00 AM Istvan Toth wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We are getting to the point where releasing the next Phoenix versions is
> within sight.
>
> The next steps will be releasing queryserver
Thanks Chenglei for bringing the failures to the notice. Have you confirmed
that reverting PHOENIX-5140 fixes the problem? if yes then I would suggest
reverting the fix and re-open the JIRA to be worked upon separately for the
new fix.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 7:14 PM cheng...@apache.org
wrote:
>
th IndexExtendedIT and
> IndexScrutinyToolIT are always failed.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 2020-12-10 16:51:27, "Ankit Singhal" wrote:
> >Thanks Chenglei for bringing the failures to the notice. Have you
> confirmed
> >that
Thanks Geoffrey (and Chenglei once again).
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 12:46 PM Geoffrey Jacoby wrote:
> I already reverted the patch from both branches earlier this afternoon.
> Sorry for the noise.
>
> Geoffrey
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 2:44 PM Ankit Singhal
> wrote:
ugs, feel free to do so.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Xinyi
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:41 AM Ankit Singhal wrote:
>
> > Thanks Daniel and appreciate the effort you put in getting the list ready
> > for bugs producing wrong results
> > but none of them seems to
On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Richárd
Antal
has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on Apache Phoenix.
We appreciate all of the great contributions Richárd has made to the
community thus far and we look forward to his continued involvement.
Cong
1 - 100 of 1635 matches
Mail list logo
