[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5138) ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones created before it

2019-05-18 Thread jaanai (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

jaanai updated PHOENIX-5138:

Fix Version/s: 5.0.1

> ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones 
> created before it
> --
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5138
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.15.0, 5.1
>Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Assignee: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.15.0, 5.1.0, 5.0.1
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5138-v2.patch, PHOENIX-5138-v3.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5138-v4.patch, PHOENIX-5138.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 4h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> PHOENIX-5132 changed the ViewIndexId generation logic to use one sequence per 
> physical view index table, whereas before it had been tenant + physical 
> table. This removed the possibility of a tenant view index and a global view 
> index having colliding ViewIndexIds.
> However, existing Phoenix environments may have already created tenant-owned 
> view index ids using the old sequence, and under PHOENIX-5132 if they create 
> another, its ViewIndexId will got back to MIN_VALUE, which could cause a 
> collision with an existing view index id. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5138) ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones created before it

2019-04-09 Thread Geoffrey Jacoby (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Geoffrey Jacoby updated PHOENIX-5138:
-
Attachment: PHOENIX-5138-v4.patch

> ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones 
> created before it
> --
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5138
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.15.0, 5.1
>Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Assignee: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.15.0, 5.1.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5138-v2.patch, PHOENIX-5138-v3.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5138-v4.patch, PHOENIX-5138.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 4h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> PHOENIX-5132 changed the ViewIndexId generation logic to use one sequence per 
> physical view index table, whereas before it had been tenant + physical 
> table. This removed the possibility of a tenant view index and a global view 
> index having colliding ViewIndexIds.
> However, existing Phoenix environments may have already created tenant-owned 
> view index ids using the old sequence, and under PHOENIX-5132 if they create 
> another, its ViewIndexId will got back to MIN_VALUE, which could cause a 
> collision with an existing view index id. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5138) ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones created before it

2019-04-03 Thread Geoffrey Jacoby (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Geoffrey Jacoby updated PHOENIX-5138:
-
Attachment: PHOENIX-5138-v3.patch

> ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones 
> created before it
> --
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5138
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.15.0, 5.1
>Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Assignee: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.15.0, 5.1.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5138-v2.patch, PHOENIX-5138-v3.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5138.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 1h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> PHOENIX-5132 changed the ViewIndexId generation logic to use one sequence per 
> physical view index table, whereas before it had been tenant + physical 
> table. This removed the possibility of a tenant view index and a global view 
> index having colliding ViewIndexIds.
> However, existing Phoenix environments may have already created tenant-owned 
> view index ids using the old sequence, and under PHOENIX-5132 if they create 
> another, its ViewIndexId will got back to MIN_VALUE, which could cause a 
> collision with an existing view index id. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5138) ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones created before it

2019-03-26 Thread Geoffrey Jacoby (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Geoffrey Jacoby updated PHOENIX-5138:
-
Attachment: PHOENIX-5138-v2.patch

> ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones 
> created before it
> --
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5138
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.15.0, 5.1
>Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Assignee: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.15.0, 5.1.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5138-v2.patch, PHOENIX-5138.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> PHOENIX-5132 changed the ViewIndexId generation logic to use one sequence per 
> physical view index table, whereas before it had been tenant + physical 
> table. This removed the possibility of a tenant view index and a global view 
> index having colliding ViewIndexIds.
> However, existing Phoenix environments may have already created tenant-owned 
> view index ids using the old sequence, and under PHOENIX-5132 if they create 
> another, its ViewIndexId will got back to MIN_VALUE, which could cause a 
> collision with an existing view index id. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5138) ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones created before it

2019-03-25 Thread Geoffrey Jacoby (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Geoffrey Jacoby updated PHOENIX-5138:
-
Attachment: PHOENIX-5138.patch

> ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones 
> created before it
> --
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5138
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.15.0, 5.1
>Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Assignee: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.15.0, 5.1.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5138.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> PHOENIX-5132 changed the ViewIndexId generation logic to use one sequence per 
> physical view index table, whereas before it had been tenant + physical 
> table. This removed the possibility of a tenant view index and a global view 
> index having colliding ViewIndexIds.
> However, existing Phoenix environments may have already created tenant-owned 
> view index ids using the old sequence, and under PHOENIX-5132 if they create 
> another, its ViewIndexId will got back to MIN_VALUE, which could cause a 
> collision with an existing view index id. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5138) ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones created before it

2019-03-22 Thread Thomas D'Silva (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Thomas D'Silva updated PHOENIX-5138:

Fix Version/s: 5.1.0
   4.15.0

> ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones 
> created before it
> --
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5138
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.15.0, 5.1
>Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Assignee: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.15.0, 5.1.0
>
>
> PHOENIX-5132 changed the ViewIndexId generation logic to use one sequence per 
> physical view index table, whereas before it had been tenant + physical 
> table. This removed the possibility of a tenant view index and a global view 
> index having colliding ViewIndexIds.
> However, existing Phoenix environments may have already created tenant-owned 
> view index ids using the old sequence, and under PHOENIX-5132 if they create 
> another, its ViewIndexId will got back to MIN_VALUE, which could cause a 
> collision with an existing view index id. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5138) ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones created before it

2019-03-19 Thread Geoffrey Jacoby (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Geoffrey Jacoby updated PHOENIX-5138:
-
Affects Version/s: 5.1
 Priority: Blocker  (was: Major)

> ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones 
> created before it
> --
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5138
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.15.0, 5.1
>Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Assignee: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Priority: Blocker
>
> PHOENIX-5132 changed the ViewIndexId generation logic to use one sequence per 
> physical view index table, whereas before it had been tenant + physical 
> table. This removed the possibility of a tenant view index and a global view 
> index having colliding ViewIndexIds.
> However, existing Phoenix environments may have already created tenant-owned 
> view index ids using the old sequence, and under PHOENIX-5132 if they create 
> another, its ViewIndexId will got back to MIN_VALUE, which could cause a 
> collision with an existing view index id. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5138) ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones created before it

2019-02-13 Thread Geoffrey Jacoby (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Geoffrey Jacoby updated PHOENIX-5138:
-
Description: 
PHOENIX-5132 changed the ViewIndexId generation logic to use one sequence per 
physical view index table, whereas before it had been tenant + physical table. 
This removed the possibility of a tenant view index and a global view index 
having colliding ViewIndexIds.

However, existing Phoenix environments may have already created tenant-owned 
view index ids using the old sequence, and under PHOENIX-5132 if they create 
another, its ViewIndexId will got back to MIN_VALUE, which could cause a 
collision with an existing view index id. 



> ViewIndexId sequences created after PHOENIX-5132 shouldn't collide with ones 
> created before it
> --
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5138
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5138
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 4.15.0
>Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Assignee: Geoffrey Jacoby
>Priority: Major
>
> PHOENIX-5132 changed the ViewIndexId generation logic to use one sequence per 
> physical view index table, whereas before it had been tenant + physical 
> table. This removed the possibility of a tenant view index and a global view 
> index having colliding ViewIndexIds.
> However, existing Phoenix environments may have already created tenant-owned 
> view index ids using the old sequence, and under PHOENIX-5132 if they create 
> another, its ViewIndexId will got back to MIN_VALUE, which could cause a 
> collision with an existing view index id. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)