[jira] [Updated] (PIG-5067) Revisit union on numeric type and chararray to bytearray
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-5067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Koji Noguchi updated PIG-5067: -- Hadoop Flags: Incompatible change,Reviewed (was: Incompatible change) > Revisit union on numeric type and chararray to bytearray > > > Key: PIG-5067 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-5067 > Project: Pig > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Koji Noguchi >Assignee: Koji Noguchi > Fix For: 0.17.0 > > Attachments: pig-5067-v01.patch, pig-5067-v02.patch > > > In PIG-2071, we changed the behavior of union on numeric and chararray to > bytearray. > This itself was always failing at runtime until we changed to skip the > bytearray typecast for union-onschema in PIG-3270. > (For union, it still fails with typecast to bytearray error. ) > Now, seeing users getting inconsistent results due to this union-ed bytearray. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (PIG-5067) Revisit union on numeric type and chararray to bytearray
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-5067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-5067:
--
Attachment: pig-5067-v02.patch
Thanks for the review Daniel.
Tests passed, committing shortly.
Found one typo in my error message.
{noformat}
< String msg = "Union of incompatible types now allowed. "
> String msg = "Union of incompatible types not allowed. "
{noformat}
Obviously, it should be "NOT" allowed. Updating the patch and committing this
one.
> Revisit union on numeric type and chararray to bytearray
>
>
> Key: PIG-5067
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-5067
> Project: Pig
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Koji Noguchi
>Assignee: Koji Noguchi
> Attachments: pig-5067-v01.patch, pig-5067-v02.patch
>
>
> In PIG-2071, we changed the behavior of union on numeric and chararray to
> bytearray.
> This itself was always failing at runtime until we changed to skip the
> bytearray typecast for union-onschema in PIG-3270.
> (For union, it still fails with typecast to bytearray error. )
> Now, seeing users getting inconsistent results due to this union-ed bytearray.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (PIG-5067) Revisit union on numeric type and chararray to bytearray
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-5067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated PIG-5067:
--
Attachment: pig-5067-v01.patch
Attaching {{pig-5067-v01.patch}} that would
* Fail for incompatible union with "onschema". Regular union has been failing
already.
* union with different internal column types for tuples or bags are still
allowed (with empty schema)
* Add line-number for "union" failures.
> Revisit union on numeric type and chararray to bytearray
>
>
> Key: PIG-5067
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-5067
> Project: Pig
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Koji Noguchi
>Assignee: Koji Noguchi
> Attachments: pig-5067-v01.patch
>
>
> In PIG-2071, we changed the behavior of union on numeric and chararray to
> bytearray.
> This itself was always failing at runtime until we changed to skip the
> bytearray typecast for union-onschema in PIG-3270.
> (For union, it still fails with typecast to bytearray error. )
> Now, seeing users getting inconsistent results due to this union-ed bytearray.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
