AW: [DISCUSS] How about releasing the plc4x-build-tools (PLC4X-maven-plugin)

2019-09-02 Thread Strljic, Matthias Milan
Hi, +1 pro release greetings Matthias Strljic, M.Sc. Universität Stuttgart Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW) Seidenstraße 36 70174 Stuttgart GERMANY Tel: +49 711 685-84530 Fax: +49 711 685-74530 E-Mail: 

Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate CRUNCH into PLC4X

2019-09-02 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Matthias, I agree with you view on things. In fact CRUNCH will be something like the "scraper on steroids" as it has tons of other more useful features. So I guess lots of users (Kafka Adapter, ES Adapter, ...) will love it. Regarding the Structure, I agree with you. It is not uncommon to

Board report draft

2019-09-02 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi all, I just finished a first draft of our September board report. Please leave feedback here in this thread. I’m planning on submitting this before leaving to Vegas this Thursday. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PLC4X/2019-September Chris

[jira] [Created] (PLC4X-142) OPC-UA read variables

2019-09-02 Thread Valerio Castrovilli (Jira)
Valerio Castrovilli created PLC4X-142: - Summary: OPC-UA read variables Key: PLC4X-142 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLC4X-142 Project: Apache PLC4X Issue Type: Bug

Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate CRUNCH into PLC4X

2019-09-02 Thread Kai Wähner
*"So in the mid- or longterm I agree that it would be nice to rename PLC4X to something like "Industrial IoT and Industrie 4.0 we kick your ass" or something with subprojects like - CRUNCH as processing pipeline - PLC4X as connection - hopefully some more to come"* >From an external perspective,

Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate CRUNCH into PLC4X

2019-09-02 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi all, well I sort of think renaming it to something different would be a really bad idea (Toddy also doesn't like the idea) And I agree that PLC4X should be true to its project statement to provide protocol adapters for the different industrial protocols in multiple languages. I personally

Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate CRUNCH into PLC4X

2019-09-02 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, we already had an interesting debate (about version numbers for next release) with Kai where he convinced me with his arguments, so I take his view extremely serios. I agree with both of you, kind of. CRUNCH is, as I state it below, a sort of Scraper but a bit cleaner, nice API and all

Re: [VOTE] Accept CRUNCH as subproject for PLC4X

2019-09-02 Thread Christofer Dutz
+1 (binding) It should run through the ip clearance of the incubator as well as potentially a name check, if we want to stick to crunch or for any alternate name we might be coming up with (we should come up with the name before creating the repo) guess if it's Somethong like "plc4x compute"

Re: [VOTE] Accept CRUNCH as subproject for PLC4X

2019-09-02 Thread Julian Feinauer
+1 (binding) I would also opt for a better name. Julian Am 02.09.19, 21:03 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : +1 (binding) It should run through the ip clearance of the incubator as well as potentially a name check, if we want to stick to crunch or for any alternate name we might be

AW: [VOTE] Accept CRUNCH as subproject for PLC4X

2019-09-02 Thread Bahamada
+1 (binding) Sebastian Von: Julian Feinauer Gesendet: Montag, 2. September 2019 21:03 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Accept CRUNCH as subproject for PLC4X +1 (binding) I would also opt for a better name. Julian Am 02.09.19, 21:03 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : +1 (binding)

[VOTE] Accept CRUNCH as subproject for PLC4X

2019-09-02 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi all, as the discussion seems to slow down and to stabilizes in [1] I take the freedom to start a vote. The vote is ONLY about accepting the project CRUNCH [2] as a subproject to PLC4X (its not about changing the TLPs Name, or changing the scope of the project or other things that came up