Re: [VOTE] Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release (RC5)

2016-10-02 Thread Alex Merritt
+1 binding On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for voting. Please indicate binding or non-binding when you cast > your vote. Release votes require 3 binding +1's from PMC to pass. > > Regards, > Donald > > On Saturday, October 1, 2016,

Re: [VOTE] Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release (RC5)

2016-10-01 Thread Matthew Tovbin
+1 binding -Matthew On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for voting. Please indicate binding or non-binding when you cast > your vote. Release votes require 3 binding +1's from PMC to pass. > > Regards, > Donald > > On Saturday, October

Re: [VOTE] Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release (RC5)

2016-10-01 Thread Donald Szeto
Hi all, Thanks for voting. Please indicate binding or non-binding when you cast your vote. Release votes require 3 binding +1's from PMC to pass. Regards, Donald On Saturday, October 1, 2016, Kenneth Chan wrote: > +1 > > On Saturday, October 1, 2016, Pat Ferrel

Re: [VOTE] Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release (RC5)

2016-10-01 Thread Kenneth Chan
+1 On Saturday, October 1, 2016, Pat Ferrel wrote: > +1 binding > > On Oct 1, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Suneel Marthi > wrote: > > +1 binding > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Matthew Tovbin >

Re: [VOTE] Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release (RC5)

2016-10-01 Thread Pat Ferrel
+1 binding On Oct 1, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: +1 binding On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Matthew Tovbin wrote: > +1 > > - Matthew > > On Oct 1, 2016 00:18, "Donald Szeto" wrote: > >> This is the vote for

Re: [VOTE] Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release (RC5)

2016-10-01 Thread Matthew Tovbin
+1 - Matthew On Oct 1, 2016 00:18, "Donald Szeto" wrote: > This is the vote for 0.10.0 of Apache PredictionIO (incubating). > > The vote will run for at least 72 hours and will close on Oct 3rd, 2016. > > RC2 adds the "apache-" prefix to artifact filenames. > > RC3 adds on

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release (RC4)

2016-09-24 Thread Pat Ferrel
+1 binding On Sep 23, 2016, at 12:28 PM, Alex Merritt wrote: +1 (Binding) Extracted, built, installed manually (with HBase / ElasticSearch / local fs configured in pio-env.sh), start script works, status works, sbt tests pass. Had low system entropy which caused fail on

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-20 Thread Donald Szeto
Hi Andy, What if the set of artifacts are built from the source tarball, and they are an integral part of the ecosystem (e.g. PredictionIO engine developers use these artifacts to build engines)? I read from http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#stage-release-vote that we

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-20 Thread Andrew Purtell
The release artifact should be one signed and summed tarball. > On Sep 20, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > that was my thinking too, hence I have been holding off from even > downloading any of the artifacts. > >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Pat Ferrel

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-20 Thread Suneel Marthi
that was my thinking too, hence I have been holding off from even downloading any of the artifacts. On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Shouldn’t this be one tarball? > > > On Sep 18, 2016, at 6:53 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > > Yes.

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-20 Thread Pat Ferrel
Shouldn’t this be one tarball? On Sep 18, 2016, at 6:53 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: Yes. Many of them are sources, docs, poms and signatures though. On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > So all of these artifacts need to be verified

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-18 Thread Donald Szeto
Yes. Many of them are sources, docs, poms and signatures though. On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > So all of these artifacts need to be verified and validated ? > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-18 Thread Suneel Marthi
So all of these artifacts need to be verified and validated ? https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepredictionio-1003/org/apache/predictionio/ On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Donald Szeto wrote: > I will start a new voting thread. The staging repo

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-18 Thread Suneel Marthi
the MAven staging repo brings up whole load of artifacts, which ones r we voting on again ? On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Donald Szeto wrote: > I have prepared a RC2. The artifacts can be downloaded here: >

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-18 Thread Suneel Marthi
Yes u do have to vote fresh each time u create a new RC. On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Donald Szeto wrote: > I have prepared a RC2. The artifacts can be downloaded here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/predictionio/0.10.0- > incubating-rc2/ > or from the

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-16 Thread Donald Szeto
If everyone agrees that the artifacts should have an "apache-" prefix, I will roll an RC2 shortly. Since the namespace change is unavoidable, might as well get all artifact name changes done in one shot for good. On Friday, September 16, 2016, Andrew Purtell wrote: >

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-16 Thread Andrew Purtell
Let me double check. > On Sep 16, 2016, at 7:33 AM, Alex Merritt wrote: > > I believe it depends on which of the two votes you mean. For the podling > vote, PPMC votes are binding, for the incubator vote, IPMC votes are, no? > >> On Sep 15, 2016 9:42 PM, "Andrew

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-15 Thread Pat Ferrel
Sure enough, is there one place with a checklist of things to look for? On Sep 15, 2016, at 5:14 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: Folks I can check on this only on Sunday after I am back from travel . I do notice off the bat that the artifacts names r missing "Apache-"

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-15 Thread Alex Merritt
+1 (binding) On Sep 15, 2016 1:49 PM, "Suneel Marthi" wrote: > Folks, When u vote please specify "+1 Binding" if u r a PMC member. Its > only the PMC votes that count for a release to pass. > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Robert Lu

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-15 Thread Tom Chan
+1 On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Mani Teja wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Pat Ferrel > wrote: > > > > > Donald, you get a vote too.

Re: [VOTE]: Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.10.0 Release

2016-09-15 Thread Donald Szeto
+1 On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Donald, you get a vote too. We need 3 (assuming no one is -1) to graduate > this. > > Everyone please vote! > > On Sep 14, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Matthew Tovbin wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, Sep 14,