Status of Pulsar 2.9.0 and starting 2.9.1

Hello folks, Yesterday we committed the release notes for 2.9.0. I just have to publish a couple of other artifacts and update the website before announcing 2.9.0. My plan is to complete the procedure next week. In the meantime, early next week, I believe it is time to prepare the first RC of 2.9.

Re: Status of Pulsar 2.9.0 and starting 2.9.1

10, 2021 at 11:23 PM Michael Marshall < > mmarsh...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 - thanks Enrico. > > > > > > > > - Michael > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:11 AM Lari Hotari > >

Re: Status of Pulsar 2.9.0 and starting 2.9.1

in 2.9.0 and 2.9.0 also has a > >> critical > >>>> bug https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12993 > >>>> which will lead the topic stop to provide services for more than 5min. > >> It > >>>> looks like, hey, we have a new releas

Re: PIP 112: Generate Release Notes Automatically

Yu, thanks a great initiative and I support it at 100% It looks like you are on your way. Looking forward to seeing the results ! Enrico Il giorno lun 13 dic 2021 alle ore 09:19 Yu ha scritto: > Hi Pulsarers, > > As we know[1], there are some issues in the current Pulsar release notes > (RN),

CI is failing consistently due to maven.restlet.com

Hello, CI is failing due to an expired certificate on maven.restlet.com. I was waiting for CI to be green before cutting 2.9.1so sad ! Error: Failed to execute goal on project pulsar-io-solr: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.pulsar:pulsar-io-solr:jar:2.9.0: Failed to coll

Re: CI is failing consistently due to maven.restlet.com

I would change CI jobs by adding " -Dmaven.wagon.http.ssl.ignore.validity.dates=true" but that should considered some kind of security problem as we could download from bad https servers Enrico Il giorno lun 13 dic 2021 alle ore 11:35 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha s

Re: [discuss] BacklogQuota param change

ZhangJian it looks like a regression, I will wait for a patch before cutting the first RC for 2.9.1 thanks for sharing this problem Enrico Il giorno mar 14 dic 2021 alle ore 07:19 PengHui Li ha scritto: > Thanks, ZhangJian. > > Looking forward to your PR. > > Penghui > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 202

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Marvin Cai

Kudos !! Welcome aboard Enrico Il giorno mar 14 dic 2021 alle ore 09:12 guo jiwei ha scritto: > Congratulations Marvin! > > > Regards > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 3:44 PM Yu wrote: > > > Congratulations Marvin! > > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 8:42 AM Guangning E > wrote:

Re: [PIP-78] Reduce redundant producers from partitioned producer

wever, I think we can't enable the config until all > clients are updated. > > What do you think? > Regards, > -- > Yuri Mizushima > yumiz...@yahoo-corp.jp > > > On 2021/12/02 17:37, "Enrico Olivelli" wrote: > > Yuri, > IIUC with this

Re: CheckStyle Rule Change

Il Mer 15 Dic 2021, 06:38 ZhangJian He ha scritto: > Hello everyone, I have added checkstyle on pulsar-metadata, and > UnusedImports check on test code. If your PR is involved in these two > situations. Please pull the master code. Thanks > Got it Thanks Enrico > > Thanks > ZhangJian He >

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP-120: Enable client memory limit by default

+1 Enrico Il Mer 15 Dic 2021, 06:03 ZhangJian He ha scritto: > +1 > > Thanks > ZhangJian He > > Neng Lu 于2021年12月15日周三 12:52写道： > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On 2021/12/14 19:20:02 Matteo Merli wrote: > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13306 > > > > > > > > > Pasted below for quoti

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP-119: Enable consistent hashing by default on KeyShared dispatcher

+1 Enrico Il Mer 15 Dic 2021, 05:27 Michael Marshall ha scritto: > +1 > > - Michael > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 8:59 PM Shivji Kumar Jha > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Regards, > > Shivji Kumar Jha > > http://www.shivjijha.com/ > > +91 8884075512 > > > > > > On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 06:38, Hang Che

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.8.2 candidate 1

Lin Lin, -1 (binding) I have verified the packages, all good: - unit tests are passing (many flaky tests) - RAT passes - build passes (JDK11 on Ubuntu) - Pulsar standalone works (basic smoke tests) But I am not able to verify the signatures. Please check the commands you used to stage the releas

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP-117: Change Pulsar standalone defaults

+1 @Haiting Pulsar Standalone is usually used for local development, I am not sure you need a migration tool. You can still keep the configuration to use previously (standalone.conf) Enrico Il giorno mer 15 dic 2021 alle ore 10:56 Haiting Jiang < jianghait...@apache.org> ha scritto: > +1 (non-b

Re: Status of Pulsar 2.9.0 and starting 2.9.1

h fails to pass the vote is skipped. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Let’s not announce 2.9.0 and go on to 2.9.1. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Maybe there’s some website fixes to hide 2.9.0. > > >>>>>> > &

Re: Status of Pulsar 2.9.0 and starting 2.9.1

pache/pulsar/pulls?q=is%3Apr+label%3Arelease%2F2.9.1+-label%3Acherry-picked%2Fbranch-2.9+is%3Aclosed > > In theory the answer is "yes", I am double checking. it is always an hard task Enrico > Thanks, > Hang > > Enrico Olivelli 于2021年12月15日周三 19:19写道： > > >

Re: Status of Pulsar 2.9.0 and starting 2.9.1

Hang, sorry, I wanted to say that I am double checking if people forgot to add "cherry-picked" Enrico Il giorno mer 15 dic 2021 alle ore 13:20 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > Il giorno mer 15 dic 2021 alle ore 12:52 Hang Chen >

Re: Does the #13291 should contains in 2.8.2

+1 Enrico Il giorno mer 15 dic 2021 alle ore 14:27 PengHui Li ha scritto: > We should contain #13291 in 2.8.2. > > Penghui > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:19 PM ZhangJian He wrote: > > > Hello, > > @LinLin @lipenghui > > > > I want to discuss if #13291 should contains in release 2.8.2. > > > > It

Re: Status of Pulsar 2.9.0 and starting 2.9.1

> discover any bugs that might appear in their production environments, but > if some users trust the Apache releases to be stable, that trust can be > damaged if we're not careful. > > > Devin Bost > (Sent from mobile) > > > From: Enrico

Re: [DISCUSS] Add definition to our cherry picking process

Jonathan, Il Mer 15 Dic 2021, 21:11 Jonathan Ellis ha scritto: > What are the benefits of cherry picking vs committing to the oldest > relevant branch and merging forwards? We (and most of the ASF projects I am involved in) ask contributors to target the master branch for the patches. How can

[VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.9.1 candidate 2

release notes: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13357 Pulsar's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pulsar/KEYS Please download the source package, and follow the README to build and run the Pulsar standalone service. Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.9.1 candidate 2

and tarball > > Il giorno gio 16 dic 2021 alle ore 14:25 Enrico Olivelli < > eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > This is the second release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 2.9.1. > > > > The first release candidate was aborted without starting a V

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP-118: Do not restart brokers when ZooKeeper session expires

+1 Enrico Il Ven 17 Dic 2021, 05:36 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > +1 > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:03 AM Matteo Merli wrote: > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13304 > > > > > > Pasted below for quoting convenience. > > > > --- > > > > > > ## Motivation > > > > After all the work don

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.9.1 candidate 2

bution: > > - NOTICE, README, LICENSE > > - Start standalone service and producer/consumer test > > * Src distribution: > > - NOTICE, README, LICENSE > > - Compile and unit tests > > - Start standalone service > > * Checked staging maven

Re: Status of Pulsar 2.9.0 and starting 2.9.1

new release from the > > Pulsar > > > >>>> community with the > > > >>>> serious problem(log4j bug) but after the log4j has fixed the issue > > and > > > >>>> provided the new release. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I thin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.9.1 candidate 2

> > > > Will this issue be fixed in the future releases? > > > > > > PengHui Li 於 2021年12月17日 週五 21:53 寫道： > > > > > > > Hi Enrico, > > > > > > > > I'm ok, it only happens when the message is without a schema versi

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.4 Candidate 1

Jiwei Guo, Thanks for driving the release today is Saturday, so I am not sure how many people will have time to test the release candidate during the 72 hours period (for instance I can do it only on Monday, hopefully). Please take this into consideration when you are going to close the VOTE, maybe

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.9.1 candidate 2

Hello everyone, The VOTE passed with 5 VOTEs, 3 of them were binding. - Matteo Merli (binding) - Enrico Olivelli (binding) - Peng Hui (binding) - Nicolò Boschi - Massimiliano Mirelli I will move forward with the next steps https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Release-process Enrico Il giorno

Re: Status of Pulsar 2.9.0 and starting 2.9.1

won't have time to do this before the beginning of January, it would be useful if someone could do it Enrico > > [a] > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Release-process#16-update-the-site > [b] https://pulsar.apache.org/blog/2021/09/23/Apache-Pulsar-2-8-1/ > > > On Fr

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.9.1 candidate 2

Test.testCreateTransactionSystemTopic(org.apache.pulsar.broker.transaction.TransactionTest) > [INFO] Run 1: PASS > [ERROR] Run 2: TransactionTest.testCreateTransactionSystemTopic:145 > expected [4] but found [3] > [INFO] > [INFO] > [ERROR] Tests run: 9, Failures: 1, Errors: 0

DISCUSS - [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.9.1 candidate 2

; > [image: image.png] > > Penghui > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 8:24 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >> Il giorno lun 20 dic 2021 alle ore 13:21 PengHui Li >> ha >> scritto: >> >> > Hi Enrico, >> > >> > Have you checked the CI stat

OSX packages status....broken ?!?

Hello, According to the release procedure I am trying to build the OSX packages but the build fails. This is the issue: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13429 Apart from fixing the problem itself, I wonder if it would be better to create a CI job that periodically runs such a procedure. T

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.8.2 candidate 2

Il giorno mar 21 dic 2021 alle ore 11:49 Shivji Kumar Jha < shiv4...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi LinLin, > > Log4j version 2.16.0 has DDoS possibilities in some cases [1] . Can we move > to Log4j 2.17.0 in 2.8.2? > is it included https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/v2.8.2-candidate-2 Enrico

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.7.4 Candidate 2

+1 (binding) - built from sources, JDK8 in MacOS - run pulsar standalone, smoke tests - verified checksum and digital signatures - I took a look to the Maven staging repository Thanks for driving the release Enrico Il giorno mar 21 dic 2021 alle ore 11:27 Nozomi Kurihara < nkuri...@apache.org>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.8.2 candidate 2

1 dic 2021 alle ore 11:54 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > Il giorno mar 21 dic 2021 alle ore 11:49 Shivji Kumar Jha < > shiv4...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > >> Hi LinLin, >> >> Log4j version 2.16.0 has DDoS possibilities in some

WebSite build CI job does work - blocker for announcing release !

Hello, the WebSite build CI job is stuck https://github.com/apache/pulsar/runs/4601374159?check_suite_focus=true This is probably the problem, it is due to "crowdin" that is timing out File 'master/website/versioned_docs/version-2.6.3/concepts-overview.md'| - SKIPPED File 'master/website/i18n/en.

Re: [PR] Pulsar non root docker image

Michael, I would like to add this item to the list https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/10815 Basically if you are running as non root, you cannot add tools on demand, so we need to add basic tools, like netstat/vim/unzip otherwise when you have a problem you are trapped. there are ways to

Re: [VOTE] PIP-123: Introduce Pulsar metadata CLI tool

very good Enrico Il giorno mer 22 dic 2021 alle ore 03:37 mattison chao < mattisonc...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > +1 > > On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 at 07:59, Matteo Merli wrote: > > > This is the voting thread for PIP-123. It will stay open for at least > 48h. > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/is

Re: [DISCUSS] Proceeding with PIP-62 plan, before Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 is released

Lari, Il giorno mer 22 dic 2021 alle ore 08:31 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > Dear Pulsar community members, > > PIP-62[1], "PIP 62: Move connectors, adapters and Pulsar Presto to separate > repositories" was created in April 2020. The repositories for > pulsar-connectors, pulsar-adapters and pulsar-

Re: [VOTE] PIP-120: Enable client memory limit by default

1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mer 22 dic 2021 alle ore 03:39 mattison chao < mattisonc...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > +1 > > On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 at 07:46, Matteo Merli wrote: > > > This is the voting thread for PIP-120. It will stay open for at least > 48h. > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/

Re: WebSite build CI job does work - blocker for announcing release !

this PR to increase it to 3h > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13449 > > > > > > Il giorno mer 22 dic 2021 alle ore 08:23 Enrico Olivelli < > > eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > >> Hello, > >> the WebSite build CI job is stuck &g

Re: [VOTE] PIP-119: Enable consistent hashing by default on KeyShared dispatcher

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Mer 22 Dic 2021, 16:59 Michael Marshall ha scritto: > +1 > > - Michael > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 6:09 AM Hang Chen wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Hang > > > > PengHui Li 于2021年12月22日周三 19:33写道： > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Penghui > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021

Re: [VOTE] PIP-118: Do not restart brokers when ZooKeeper session expires

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Mer 22 Dic 2021, 13:09 Hang Chen ha scritto: > +1 > > Thanks, > Hang > > PengHui Li 于2021年12月22日周三 19:34写道： > > > > +1 > > > > Penghui > > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 7:22 AM Matteo Merli wrote: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13304 > > > > > > Followi

Re: [VOTE] PIP-120: Enable client memory limit by default

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Mer 22 Dic 2021, 16:58 Michael Marshall ha scritto: > +1 > > - Michael > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 6:10 AM Hang Chen wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Hang > > > > PengHui Li 于2021年12月22日周三 19:28写道： > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Penghui > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021

Re: [DISCUSS] Proceeding with PIP-62 plan, before Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 is released

> > I believe we want to keep SQL until the code change lands in Trino. > Because > > there are still users using this component. > > > > - Sijie > > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 11:34 PM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > > > > > Lari, > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove Grafana and Prometheus Dockerfiles; Remove DCOS example

+1 Enrico Il Gio 23 Dic 2021, 19:01 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > +1 > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 9:53 AM Michael Marshall > wrote: > > > Update: the PR [0] to remove the grafana docker image is now merged. I > > still need reviews for the PR to remove the Prometheus docker image > > [1]. I will f

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar 2.9.1 released

The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pulsar version 2.9.1. Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics, guaranteed at-least-once delivery of messages, automatic cursor management for subsc

Re: [Vote] PIP 126: Support custom and pluggable consumer selector

zhangao, I missed the discussion thread about this change. did we discuss this somewhere ? otherwise it is premature to start a VOTE Enrico Il giorno ven 24 dic 2021 alle ore 08:22 zhangao ha scritto: > > Hi Pulsar Community, Please vote for this PIP.Best Regards,zhangao

[DISCUSS] PIP-124: Pulsar Client Shared State API

Hello everyone, I want to start a discussion about PIP-124 Pulsar Client Shared State API This is the PIP document https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13490 This is a demo implementation (a proof-of-concept): https://github.com/eolivelli/pulsar-shared-state-manager Please take a look and sh

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 release

PengHui, Il giorno lun 27 dic 2021 alle ore 05:47 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > Hi, everyone > > I hope you’ve all been doing well. I would like to start an email thread to > discuss features that we planned for 2.10.0. > According to the time-based release plan > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wi

Re: [DISCUSSION] Produce chunk messages failed when topic level maxMessageSize is set

It looks loke you already prepared a awesome PIP! Please copy your proposal on a PIP. I am +1 Enrico Il Mar 28 Dic 2021, 04:27 Zike Yang ha scritto: > + 1 for skipping the topic level message size check for the chunk message > in the broker. > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 9:14 AM guo jiwei wrote

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP-130: Apply redelivery backoff policy for ack timeout

Penghui I am overall +1 to this proposal but I am afraid about compatibility. Amd I won't to be sure that we are not breaking anything. Pulsar client and Consumer are configurable using a map of key value pairs. So we must take care of not changing the behaviour. What do you mean with 'redelivery

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP-130: Apply redelivery backoff policy for ack timeout

/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/impl/conf/ConsumerConfigurationData.java#L78 > > Regards, > Penghui > > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:19 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Penghui > > > > I am overall +1 to this proposal but I am afraid about compatibility. &g

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-124: Pulsar Client Shared State API

s power of Pulsar. In Pravega you have State Synchronizers and they are a great foundational API and we are missing something like that in Pulsar. Enrico > -- > Matteo Merli > > > On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 1:53 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 2.8.2 candidate 2

What's the status of this VOTE? Enrico Il Mer 22 Dic 2021, 10:34 Nicolò Boschi ha scritto: > +1 (non binding) > > Checks: > - Checksum and signatures > - Apache Rat check passes > - Compile from source w JDK8 > - Build docker image from source > - Run Pulsar standalone and produce-consume from

Sending 2.6 release line to EOF

Hello, We are no more cutting releases out of branch-2.6 We must declare 2.6 EOF. IIUC there is no process established for this at the moment in the Pulsar project. So for this time I will call out a VOTE next week, as we did not cut releases for a few important bugs. Thoughts? Enrico

Re: [VOTE] PIP-130: Apply redelivery backoff policy for ack timeout

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Mar 4 Gen 2022, 16:19 刘德志 ha scritto: > > > +1 > > Thanks, > Dezhi Liu

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.9.2 release

171 commits? Why? This is too much in my opinion for a point release. I am pretty sure that we don't need all that changes. Every change we cherry pick has a good chance to break the stability Enrico Il Mer 5 Gen 2022, 16:30 mattison chao ha scritto: > +1 > > regards, > Mattisonchao > > On

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.9.2 release

. Enrico Il Mer 5 Gen 2022, 17:29 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > 171 commits? > > Why? > > This is too much in my opinion for a point release. > > I am pretty sure that we don't need all that changes. > > Every change we cherry pick has a good chance to break the

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP-121: Pulsar cluster level auto failover

I am commeting on the GH issue Thanks Enrico Il Mer 5 Gen 2022, 04:56 PengHui Li ha scritto: > +1 > > Penghui > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:51 PM Hang Chen wrote: > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13315 > > > > Pasted below for quoting convenience. > > > > > > ### Motivation >

Re: About the implementation of a Mail Queue using Pulsar in Apache James

Benoit, Il Gio 6 Gen 2022, 10:54 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto: > Hello Pulsar folks! > > I am a member of the Apache James PMC, whose maintain the Java Apache > Mail Extensible Server (for the intimates hence James). The Distributed > James server aims at scaling emails on top of modern databases a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar 2.8.2 released

Thanks! Congrats Enrico Il Gio 6 Gen 2022, 13:26 PengHui Li ha scritto: > Thanks for the great work! > > Regards, > Penghui > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:16 PM linlin wrote: > > > The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pulsar version 2.8.2. > > > > Pulsar is a highly scalable, low

Re: upcoming change: Apache Pulsar Helm Chart switching from Pulsar 2.7.4 version to 2.8.2; known issue with ZK when TLS is enabled

Sijie, Il Ven 7 Gen 2022, 01:58 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > The fundamental problem I see is that we don't have a proper helm chart > release and we don't have good versioning guidance. > > Chart should have its own version, which is independent of the Pulsar > version. > > Also, we need to provide

[LAZY CONSENSUS] Sending 2.6 release line to EOF

Jan 3, 2022 at 3:40 PM 陳智弘 wrote: > > > > > >> I think having a vote and quickly announce the EOF of 2.6.x will be > > >> better > > >> to the community. > > >> > > >> > > >> Dave Fisher 於 2022年1月4日 週二 06:06 寫道： >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-121: Pulsar cluster level auto failover on client side

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno lun 10 gen 2022 alle ore 07:45 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > This is the voting thread for PIP-121. It will stay open for at least 48 > hours. > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13315 > > Pasted below for quoting convenience. > > - > ### Motivation > We hav

Re: [VOTE] PIP-122: Change loadBalancer default loadSheddingStrategy to ThresholdShedder

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno lun 10 gen 2022 alle ore 07:47 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > This is the voting thread for PIP-122. It will stay open for at least 48 > hours. > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13340 > > Pasted below for quoting convenience. > > > > ### Motivation > The

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP-133 Pulsar Functions Add API For Accessing Other Function States

Thank you for posting your PIP ! I am sharing some of Neng's concerns. We should define clearly how security works. Also, currently the function defines some "namespace" for the state storage, and we recently added support for custom state storage implementation. With this change each function wi

Re: [DISCUSS] Add icebox label for issues and PRs that have been inactive for more than 4 weeks

I am +1 with the initiative. I would like to add a suggestion, maybe I am exaggerating... Why not "closing" those PRs ? Closing a PR does not mean to delete it btw I am fine with the process you suggested Enrico Il giorno mer 12 gen 2022 alle ore 18:54 Michael Marshall ha scritto: > > > Ok, bo

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP-135: Include MetadataStore backend for Etcd

+1 Enrico Il Gio 13 Gen 2022, 06:01 Joe F ha scritto: > +1 > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:52 PM Aloys Zhang wrote: > > > +1 > > > > 陳智弘 于2022年1月12日周三 10:19写道： > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Haiting Jiang 於 2022年1月12日 週三 09:50 寫道： > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On 2022/01/12 01:44:21 PengHui Li wr

Re: [VOTE] PIP-135: Include MetadataStore backend for Etcd

+1 (binding) Thanks Enrico Il Ven 14 Gen 2022, 23:52 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13717 > > - > > ## Motivation > > Since all the pieces that composed the proposal in PIP-45 were finally > merged > and are currently ready for 2.10 release, it is now pos

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-124: Pulsar Client Shared State API

@matteo ping Enrico Il Mer 29 Dic 2021, 08:35 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > Matteo, > > Il Mer 29 Dic 2021, 02:57 Matteo Merli ha > scritto: > >> > * Add an API to the Java client that makes it easier to maintain a >> consistent Share State between instances of

Re: [VOTE] PIP-135: Include MetadataStore backend for Etcd

Il Sab 15 Gen 2022, 09:10 tamer Abdlatif ha scritto: > Will that affect the existing ZK metadata in a pulsar instance , When we > upgrade from a lower version to 2.10 ? In other words, > Do we need a metadate migration to switch from ZK to Etcd ? > There is no need to migrate. Most probably th

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member - Lari Hotari

Congratulations! Enrico Il Lun 17 Gen 2022, 22:03 frank ha scritto: > Congrats Lari - very well deserved > > Frank > > > > > > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 15:50:37 -0500 w...@apache.org > wrote > > Hi - > > The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Lari > Hotari > (

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-86: Pulsar Functions: Preload and release external resources

Neng, Il Gio 20 Gen 2022, 20:20 Neng Lu ha scritto: > Hi All, > > Just want to bring this PIP[1] to your attention. The PRs [2] have been > open for quite some time. The feature is valuable for many use cases and I > would like to help the original author to push the effort on it. > > The genera

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Haiting Jiang

Congratulations! Enrico Il Ven 21 Gen 2022, 08:38 Aloys Zhang ha scritto: > Congratulations! > > zhangao 于2022年1月21日周五 15:07写道： > > > Congratulations!  > > > > > > Best Regards, > > zhangao > > -- 原始邮件 -- > > 发件人: > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-86: Pulsar Functions: Preload and release external resources

+1 Enrico Il Ven 21 Gen 2022, 21:18 Jerry Peng ha scritto: > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 12:07 PM Neng Lu wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I would like to start a VOTE on the PIP 86. (If it's already been voted, > > please let me know.) > > > > The issue for PIP 86 is here: > > > > > https://gi

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Sending 2.6 release line to EOF

Good. I will send an email to u...@pulsar.apache.org that states the EOL status for 2.6 Enrico Il giorno lun 10 gen 2022 alle ore 19:26 Chris Herzog ha scritto: > > I agree with 2.6 EOL. > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 2:35 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > This thread is now

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar 2.6 (and previous release lines) is EOL

Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] PIP-118: Do not restart brokers when ZooKeeper session expires

What's the status of this PIP ? We have a pending PR, we can commit it as soon as the VOTE thread is officially closed https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13341 Il giorno gio 23 dic 2021 alle ore 01:17 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > +1 > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 3:22 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > > >

Re: Note for pulsar-client checkstyle PR

Yunze, Il giorno mar 25 gen 2022 alle ore 13:14 Yunze Xu ha scritto: > > Hi all (especially committers), > > I opened a PR to enable checkstyle plugin for pulsar-client module just now. > See https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13940 > . Great wor

Re: upcoming change: Apache Pulsar Helm Chart switching from Pulsar 2.7.4 version to 2.8.2; known issue with ZK when TLS is enabled

great work Lari ! what about upgrading to 2.9.1 and not to 2.8.2 ? We are VOTing for 2.9.2 and 2.10 will be shipped soon isn't 2.8.2 quite old at this point ? Enrico Il giorno mer 26 gen 2022 alle ore 14:52 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > > UPDATE: > There's now a workaround for the issue with Zooke

Re: [VOTE] PIP-119: Enable consistent hashing by default on KeyShared dispatcher

HEADS up I have found this problem: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/10750 We should fix it before changing the default value Enrico Il giorno gio 23 dic 2021 alle ore 06:37 Michael Marshall ha scritto: > > +1 > > - Michael > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 6:17 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > > > > +

CVE-2021-41571: Apache Pulsar: Pulsar Admin API allows access to data from other tenants using getMessageById API

Severity: moderate Description: In Apache Pulsar it is possible to access data from BookKeeper that does not belong to the topics accessible by the authenticated user. The Admin API get-message-by-id requires the user to input a topic and a ledger id. The ledger id is a pointer to the data, and

Re: [PR] CI workflow to check dependencies with OWASP

Great idea I will review the PRs Thanks Enrico Il Lun 31 Gen 2022, 21:33 Andrey Yegorov ha scritto: > Hello, > > As a final step in the series of PRs to upgrade old dependencies with > various CVEs (by Nicolo and I) I added a PR that introduces extra check on > pom.xml files changes: it will

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

(sorry for the late reply, I am still testing, I had some other priorities). I hope that the community will test this RC and report back Enrico Il giorno mar 25 gen 2022 alle ore 15:07 Ran Gao ha scritto: > > Sorry, the 2.9.2 release candidate-1 has a wrong sign certificate. > > This is the se

Re: [PR] pulsar-adapters: remove Flink adapter

The patch is merged. Thank you Andrey, removing dead code is a good thing, as it allows the community to not waste energy. Enrico Il Ven 4 Feb 2022, 06:04 Devin Bost ha scritto: > I support this change. Having different connectors in each project is > actually really confusing for new folks

Re: [discuss] prometheus metrics doesn't satisfy with OpenMetrics format

What happens when you upgrade the Prometheus client ? Can you share some examples of "before" and "after" ? My understanding is that you posted how it looks like "after" the upgrade Thanks for working on this Enrico Il giorno mar 8 feb 2022 alle ore 08:21 ZhangJian He ha scritto: > > Before, I

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

t;> Hi Ran, thanks for driving the release. > > >> > > >> I haven't tested the rc yet but I firmly believe we should include this > > >> pull [1] which fixes a regression introduced in Pulsar 2.9.0 > > >> > > >> [1] https://github.com/a

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 release

PengHui, There is a recent discussion with Matteo (at the community meetings) about preparing the release branch a couple of weeks before sending out the official VOTE. What about creating the branch-2.10 as soon as possible? We will commit to that branch only the fixes needed to make 2.10.0 stabl

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

> > > plan, > > > otherwise, we might introduce other regression in 2.9.2. > > > > > > Another point is non-transaction users are much larger than transaction > > > users for now, > > > there are many critical issue fixes in 2.9.2, I see many users

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

Gao, The patch https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14192 has been merged. I believe that is better to roll out a new RC and have Pulsar 2.9.2 released Thanks for the good discussion Enrico Il giorno gio 10 feb 2022 alle ore 05:11 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > It should not be a blocking issue,

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

s better to cut a new release candidate out of branch-2.9 Enrico > > Thanks, > Penghui > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 2:28 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > Gao, > > The patch https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14192 has been merged. > > I believe that is better to ro

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

for any new find bugs, It > > will be a huge task for the release manager and make the release > > process delay too much time. > > I suggest to move them to 2.9.3 instead of blocking the 2.9.2 release. > > > > Best, > > Hang > > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Aloys Zhang

Congrats! Enrico Il giorno gio 10 feb 2022 alle ore 11:55 mattison chao ha scritto: > > Congratulations, Aloys Zhang > > Best, > Mattison > > > On Feb 10, 2022, at 5:26 PM, Lari Hotari wrote: > > > > Congratulations Aloys Zhang! > > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 4:46 AM linlin wrote: > > > >> T

New Feature Proposal: flag to require a non-partitioned topic on Producer/Consumer Builder

Hello, I have a use case in which my application MUST use a non-partitioned topic to work properly, but the topic name is (of course) configurable by the user. If I am not using a non-partitioned topic, I do not have string guarantees on the ordering of the message (because messages will be spread

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP 141 : Pulsar BOM

Christophe, It is not clear to me who is the consumer of this BOM. Java clients should depend on pulsar-client Pulsar IO and Functions have their own dependencies. So what's the target? Protocol Handlers? Servlets? Proxy extensions? Enrico Il Lun 14 Feb 2022, 15:05 Nicolò Boschi ha scritto:

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP 141 : Pulsar BOM

hich version is loaded, probably even if you load the same version that we in Pulsar Enrico you generally don't want to > inherit from the Pulsar parent POM and it would be great to be able to > import a BOM instead. > > Christophe > > Le lun. 14 févr. 2022 à 16:25, Enrico

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Li Li

Congratulations Enrico Il Mar 15 Feb 2022, 08:07 PengHui Li ha scritto: > The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Li Li > https://github.com/urfreespace to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce that he has accepted. > > Li Li has done a great contribution

Re: Improve quality and efficiency of image creation

Yu, Il Mar 15 Feb 2022, 13:12 Yu ha scritto: > Bumping up this thread, any thoughts? Thanks > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 1:00 AM Yu wrote: > > > Hi Pulsarers, > > > > > > As you may notice, the images in Pulsar documentation are in inconsistent > > styles, which affect user experience. This issu

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.9.2 Candidate 2

Ran, Are we cutting the new RC from the current branch-2.9? Enrico Il Mar 15 Feb 2022, 14:57 PengHui Li ha scritto: > Hi Ran, > > I think all the PRs that block the 2.9.2 release are merged. > Could you please help cherry-pick the PRs and start a new RC? > > Thanks, > Penghui > > On Mon, Feb 14

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >