+1 Github has more resources to run CI jobs as the contributions keep
growing.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:06 AM Guangning E wrote:
> After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than
> Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and
> insufficient resources.
+1
Especially for doc PRs. Passing all Jenkins tests eats up much time.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:15 PM Jinfeng Huang wrote:
> +1
> Currently, a large number of PRs are blocked by Jenkins.
>
> Best Regards,
> Jennifer
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:06 AM Guangning E wrote:
>
> > After a
+1
Currently, a large number of PRs are blocked by Jenkins.
Best Regards,
Jennifer
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:06 AM Guangning E wrote:
> After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than
> Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and
> insufficient
Thanks @Guangning E contribution, The changes LGTM +1
--
Thanks
Xiaolong Ran
> 在 2020年1月14日，上午11:05，Guangning E 写道：
>
> After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than
> Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and
> insufficient resources. The
+1
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 08:36, Guangning E wrote:
>
> After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than
> Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and
> insufficient resources. The committer cannot trigger the test.
>
> Jenkins:
