On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 4:43 PM Adam Williams wrote:
> > the starting point would be making the interface consistent across these
> two clients
>
> I agree this is a good goal and understand the desire for consistency,
> although I'm not sure that 100% parity would make sense given the
> current
, Great work.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Adam Williams wrote:
> > the starting point would be making the interface consistent across these
> two clients
>
> I agree this is a good goal and understand the desire for consistency,
> although I'm not sure that 100% parity would make sense
> the starting point would be making the interface consistent across these two
> clients
I agree this is a good goal and understand the desire for consistency,
although I'm not sure that 100% parity would make sense given the
current interface. Definitely naming can be changed to match the cgo
Awesome work, Adam! It is really great to see a native go client under
development. It will be interesting to discuss a plan how to consolidate
the native go client and cgo client. probably one of the starting point
would be making the interface consistent across these two clients.
- Sijie
On
