While trying to use futures to parallelize a simple piece of code, I
was able to remove all of the waiting except for this:
future: 3 waiting for runtime at 1282743524205.783936: [scheme_make_envunbox]
which happens continuously. What causes this function to be invoked,
and how can I eliminate
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
Catching up with some mail.
Neil wrote:
Avoiding allocation reduces GC collects, which reduces stutters and hitches.
My (possibly old) understanding of GC and mutation tell me that this
is one of those prejudices that programmers should get rid of. Every
mutation
Oh, sorry! I'll push a change back.
As to your question, I'd say not on my account.
Robby
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Casey Klein
clkl...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Casey Klein
clkl...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:40 AM,
Actually, I grepped through the source in the hope that that's
precisely what I would find. It's when I didn't that I wrote the
list.
Shriram
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
On
While we look into the other problems...
What happens if you use `let' instead of the internal defines in
`mandelbrot-point'?
There's a `set!' implicit in the `letrec' that is implicit in the use
of internal definitions. Maybe the Typed Racket optimizations confuse
the compiler so that it
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias Felleisen wrote:
Catching up with some mail.
Neil wrote:
Avoiding allocation reduces GC collects, which reduces stutters and
hitches.
My (possibly old) understanding of GC and mutation tell me that this
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:42:40 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
While trying to use futures to parallelize a simple piece of code, I
was able to
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
On Aug 25, Jay McCarthy wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
On Aug 24, Jay McCarthy wrote:
There is not now but we could make a module that only exported them
so you could
On Aug 25, Jay McCarthy wrote:
I agree that it's basically the same when done right, which is why I
initially suggested the simpler solution. I think the one benefit of
these export sets is that they make it a language abstraction
rather than a convention of where to put files.
IMO, the
Also, the email when tests fail come with filenames, which can be useful.
Robby
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Casey Klein
clkl...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Casey Klein
This change will be pushed momentarily.
Jay
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi s...@cs.brown.edu
wrote:
Why does make-hash require one argument, rather than just taking zero
like make-hash in Racket does? ASL is anyway a language with state,
so it's perfectly meaningful
Just pushed an update with optional argument constructors and
immutable hash operations.
Jay
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
What documentation are you looking at?
At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:41:04 -0600, Jay McCarthy wrote:
Unfortunately, trying to decompile this file produces an error in the
decompiler:
[sa...@punge:~/tmp plt] raco decompile mandelbrot.rkt
hash-ref: no value found for key: 1128
Blake will see if this is a bug fixed in our local
At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:17:32 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
There's a `set!' implicit in the `letrec' that is implicit in the use
of internal definitions. Maybe the Typed Racket optimizations confuse
the compiler so that it doesn't see how to convert the `let' into a
`letrec'.
One requirement
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
In my defense, I was talking about framerate, not total or average cost of
memory management.
That is very different situation.
Games are really almost real-time apps.
I'd say that they *are* real-time apps. You
Catching up ...
What documentation are you looking at?
http://docs.racket-lang.org/htdp-langs/advanced-prim-ops.html#(part._(lib._htdp-advanced..ss._lang)._.Hash_.Tables)
If I type hash in the Help Desk, I get
hash provided from racket/base, racket
but not from ASL, in contrast to, say,
On Aug 25, Eli Barzilay wrote:
[...] If I touched your code, it would be a good idea to check that
I did the right thing.
A git tip, to make this easier: you don't need to look throughout the
diff of the whole push -- that has too many changes in many cases
(including this). To conveniently
17 matches
Mail list logo
