On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* Noel Welsh noelwe...@gmail.com
- Rackunit Tests
- SRFI Tests
- Ensure that all claimed srfi's are in the installer and they all
load into racket or drracket (as appropriate)
DONE
N.
mflatt has updated `gr2' from 5633895cf0 to 2b2de4ece6.
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/5633895cf0..2b2de4ece6
So, I see from this commit that you're planning to move the version
number to 5.5. I think this is a mistake. We've been trying to be
more conventional in our project managment, and
What is the correct way to test for +nan.0 in Racket? For example, (= +nan.0
+nan.0) = #f. This seems to be the behavior specified in R6RS. In the
science collection I implemented nan? using eqv?, which seems to work in
Racket; but the result is explicitly unspecified in R6RS, which I assume
means
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
mflatt has updated `gr2' from 5633895cf0 to 2b2de4ece6.
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/5633895cf0..2b2de4ece6
So, I see from this commit that you're planning to move the version
number to 5.5. I think this is a
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Is there no conventional precedent for this?
There are several numbering schemes in use in projects that I know about:
1. major.minor.patch, as with us. The Linux Kernel, GCC, Subversion,
Git, and many many other
On Oct 27, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
I think Robby recently changed DrRacket so that user programs don't
share `ffi/unsafe' with DrRacket. That would lead to multiple
`s16vector' structure types (which didn't occur to me when Robby asked
if it would be ok to not share), and that
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Jon Rafkind rafk...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Here is the raw changelog for 5.0.2. If you would like to summarize your
changes please do so, otherwise someone (me/eli/ryan) will do it for
you. If there are any other important items to note for this release
please
Does (not (= x x)) work? That's the way people sometimes do it JavaScript, so
it can't be wrong.
Dave
On Oct 27, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Doug Williams wrote:
What is the correct way to test for +nan.0 in Racket? For example, (= +nan.0
+nan.0) = #f. This seems to be the behavior specified in R6RS.
Would people like a list of their own commits and they can choose which
ones should have an accompanying release note?
$ git log da9b718bf80c3e678e1d9372c521d512e0b91747..master --author=rafkind
On 10/27/2010 03:55 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Jon Rafkind
Please reply to Jon with release messages soon -- that's the only
thing left for the release.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
The contract library's dependent contracts are now faster and properly
assign blame when they are internally inconsistent see the docs for
-i for more details.
(this one is still okay).
The 2htdp/image library
7 hours ago, Jon Rafkind wrote:
I agree with Sam. A change from 5.2 to 5.5 wouldn't make me think
oh, lots of stuff changed but not enough to warrant a major
number, instead I would think well what happened to 5.3 and 5.4?
(I find this point to be the most convincing for a 5.1 version.)
--
Please find your name below and provide some blurb for the 5.0.2 changelog
Author: Jay McCarthy j...@racket-lang.org
- Adding define-datatype to ASL
- PLAI changes
- Webserver changes
Author: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@racket-lang.org
Faster loading of TR files?
Author: Casey
13 matches
Mail list logo