25 minutes ago, rafk...@racket-lang.org wrote:
>
> 4e8e184 Jon Rafkind 2011-07-24 16:43
> :
> | add lexer for honu
> :
> A collects/honu/core/read.rkt
Is the C code going away?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org
On 07/26/2011 10:57 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 25 minutes ago, rafk...@racket-lang.org wrote:
>> 4e8e184 Jon Rafkind 2011-07-24 16:43
>> :
>> | add lexer for honu
>> :
>> A collects/honu/core/read.rkt
> Is the C code going away?
>
That is the hope.
___
I was recently telling some people that I thought 'Ruby on Rails' was
mostly an ORM plus a set of default dispatching rules with convenient
ways of extending the defaults.
I don't have a lot of expertise on the ORM side, but I think Snooze
would probably be awesome and my MongoDB-backed structs ma
built from scratch this morning
error messages:
[1] 847
[:~/Git/Ingenious] matthias% send: target is not an object: #f for method:
change-children
=== context ===
/Users/matthias/plt/collects/racket/private/class-internal.rkt:4601:0: obj-error
/Users/matthias/plt/collects/drracket/private/mo
It will be a bit before I can look into this, but I guess that if you
throw away your prefs it will start up (or even just edit them and
throw out the language level setting). Or it may even start up on a
second try, depending on what is actually going wrong there.
Robby
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Some comments:
>
> (1) why `se-path' and not some `xexpr-path'?
The 's' was intended to be 'simple'
>
> (2) also, it looks bad to use a keyword to look for something that is
> a symbols. How about something like: '(form input #:attr nam
An hour ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > Some comments:
> >
> > (1) why `se-path' and not some `xexpr-path'?
>
> The 's' was intended to be 'simple'
As long as it deals with xexprs, I prefer the more obvious name. (I
definitely would never rem
Eli and I had a very useful conversation last night and we realized
that a lot of the ideal package system we are imagining is within our
reach very quickly. Today I made a demonstration of our ideas:
https://github.com/jeapostrophe/exp/tree/master/pkgs
There's a README there. Once you read it,
It's probably just me, but this readme is a bit too dense.
[I know the first bit. That's why I pushed the two-step.
I know a bit more from Eli. But that's an accident.]
On Jul 26, 2011, at 5:49 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> Eli and I had a very useful conversation last night and we realized
> tha
I couldn't make this happen on my own, but I've pushed a fix for the
likely problem.
Robby
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> built from scratch this morning
>
> error messages:
>
> [1] 847
> [:~/Git/Ingenious] matthias% send: target is not an object: #f for method:
At Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:05:46 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> >
> > Here are some timings for 1000 iterations on 2^20-element inputs
> > (32-bit mode, Mac Book Pro 2.53 GHz):
> >
> > C as above, gcc -02 : 1409
> > C with indire
Checklist items for the v5.1.2 release
(using the v5.1.1.900 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
commits that should have been picked, make sure that the changes are
12 matches
Mail list logo