Greetings.
On 2013 Feb 27, at 01:14, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I think part of the problem is distinguishing "module declarations"
> (which don't have a phase) from "module instantiations" (which are
> normally phase-specific).
If 'which don't have a phase' is the key phrase, how about:
phase-ne
First of all, thanks very much, Matthew, for implementing this! This looks
like a great feature to me. I have often been frustrated that users' data
structures aren't easy to quote or to manipulate in macros in the same way
as pairs or vectors; this should go a long way to improving the situation
I should mention that the literature on staged metaprogramming calls this
"cross-stage persistence," (CSP) so I second Carl's proposal of cross-phase.
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: Carl Eastlund
To: Norman Gray
Cc: dev Developers
Sent: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 05:43:49 -0500 (EST)
Subject: R
The tests are run by running "main.rkt", which has no rerrors when you
run it. It is a bit strange that those errors happen when run that
way, but I think it just means that "eval" should control the context
of the sub-programs more.
Jay
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> I'm se
At Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:53:16 -0500 (EST), "J. Ian Johnson" wrote:
> I should mention that the literature on staged metaprogramming calls this
> "cross-stage persistence," (CSP) so I second Carl's proposal of cross-phase.
All module declarations are cross-phase persistent (unlike module
instantiat
On Feb 27, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> "Cross-phase-persistence-inducing" would be an accurate description,
> but that's a mouthful. Is there a short variant that connects to
> existing terminology better than "phase-collapsing"?
1. cropping [seriously]
2. I would stay away fro
On Sunday, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> According to my rough count (and running setup with a "-j 1"),
> compiling `math' takes 40% of the whole tree compilation.
I'm surprised that nobody finds this disturbing. Maybe it was the
lack of bangs in the subject.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x
2013/2/27 Eli Barzilay :
> On Sunday, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> According to my rough count (and running setup with a "-j 1"),
>> compiling `math' takes 40% of the whole tree compilation.
>
> I'm surprised that nobody finds this disturbing. Maybe it was the
> lack of bangs in the subject.
Disturbing
Yesterday, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2013-02-26 09:53:11 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > I have finally implemented a script that hacks the on-line doc
> > pages. Currently, it does the following (and you can see the
> > changes on the web now):
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but the changes ha
Just now, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> * The layout should have the main column centered. (I thought that
> it was fine initially if the left column is part of the contents.)
BTW, resolving this should happen at the CSS level, perhaps just
reorganizing them should make it work. But if not, then I
Having recently upgraded to a retina display mac, I see the problem
pointed out in this PR:
http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view&pr=12909
Is there some way for me to help? If pointed in the right direction, I
can try to patch things. Short of that, I can be a guinea pig.
David
__
At Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:31:06 -0500, David Van Horn wrote:
> Having recently upgraded to a retina display mac, I see the problem
> pointed out in this PR:
>
> http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view&pr=12909
>
> Is there some way for me to help? If pointed in the right direction, I
> ca
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> The tests are run by running "main.rkt", which has no rerrors when you
> run it. It is a bit strange that those errors happen when run that
> way, but I think it just means that "eval" should control the context
> of the sub-programs more.
O
I think that currently you can look at what drdr does. That's the best we
have.
Meanwhile, I think that if you are willing to live a bit on the edge, you
can try to run some reasonable looking tests (break something intentionally
and make sure they complain, say) and then go ahead and push and let
On 02/27/2013 09:17 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
2013/2/27 Eli Barzilay :
On Sunday, Eli Barzilay wrote:
According to my rough count (and running setup with a "-j 1"),
compiling `math' takes 40% of the whole tree compilation.
I'm surprised that nobody finds this disturbing. Maybe it was the
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I think that currently you can look at what drdr does. That's the best we
> have.
I'll assume that this is the drdr collection in meta,
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/tree/HEAD:/collects/meta/drdr
and not the drdr2 directory, right?
On 02/27/2013 01:51 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
On Sunday, Eli Barzilay wrote:
According to my rough count (and running setup with a "-j 1"),
compiling `math' takes 40% of the whole tree compilation.
I'm running my own timing tests. So far, I've got 917s (about 15
minutes) to compile the math lib
17 matches
Mail list logo
