Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.1

2014-07-19 Thread Stevie Strickland
On Jul 17, 2014, at 6:03 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: * Stevie Strickland sstri...@ccs.neu.edu - Unit Contract Tests - Contract Region Tests - Class Contract Tests Done. Stevie _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.1

2014-07-19 Thread Stephen Bloch
On Jul 17, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: * Stephen Bloch sbl...@adelphi.edu - Picturing Programs Tests Everything works except one check-error because the wording of the error message has changed. Out of town right now, and can't get to pltgit from this laptop,

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #29061: master branch updated

2014-07-19 Thread Matthias Felleisen
Ouch, This is precisely the kind of (imperative) change I didn't hope to see. I will look at the file in a moment but I'd hope you can do this with a lambda wrapper instead of a set!. -- Matthias On Jul 19, 2014, at 1:27 AM, gcoo...@racket-lang.org wrote: pkgs/frtime/lang-ext.rkt

Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #29062: master branch updated

2014-07-19 Thread Matthias Felleisen
Thanks for the extensive internal documentation. -- Matthias On Jul 19, 2014, at 7:07 PM, gcoo...@racket-lang.org wrote: gcooper has updated `master' from 45306397cc to 2881b60536. http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/45306397cc..2881b60536 =[ One Commit

[racket-dev] Help with build failed error message

2014-07-19 Thread Alexander D. Knauth
I made a fork of the racket repo and committed some changes in a topic branch, but I got this: make[8]: Leaving directory `/home/travis/build/AlexKnauth/racket/racket/src/build' make[7]: Leaving directory `/home/travis/build/AlexKnauth/racket/racket/src/build' make[6]: Leaving directory

Re: [racket-dev] flatten-begin

2014-07-19 Thread Asumu Takikawa
On 2014-07-18 09:52:26 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: Unless someone knows why it is a bad idea, how about adding a #:all? argument that flattens all the way down? I don't see many uses of flatten-begin in our tree, but the one in compatibility/package sure looks like it could use the #:all?