At the end of part 12.6.3 of the docs in
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/reader.html, it gives some examples
Examples:
-1
reads equal to
-1
1/2
reads equal to
(/ 1 2)
1.0
reads equal to
(inexact-exact 1)
1+2i
reads equal to
(make-complex 1 2)
1/2+3/4i
reads equal to
(make-complex (/ 1 2) (/ 3 4))
1.0+3.0e7i
reads equal to
(inexact-exact (make-complex 1 3000))
2e5
reads equal to
(inexact-exact 20)
#i5
reads equal to
(inexact-exact 5)
#e2e5
reads equal to
20
#x2e5
reads equal to
741
#b101
reads equal to
5
Shouldn't all the usages of inexact-exact here actually be exact-inexact ?
(I think this is the right place to ask this sort of question - if I'm
wrong, please steer me in the right direction ;)
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev