Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: Q. about "Directly Reflective" paper

2010-11-17 Thread Shriram Krishnamurthi
Someone should write to Danvy and ask him what the heck HE was doing sleeping on the job. How could a paper on a topic like this not get a proper Schemer as a reviewer and, if so, why didn't they, uh, read the paper? On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:41 AM, John Clements wrote: > Well, he's generous ab

Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: Q. about "Directly Reflective" paper

2010-11-17 Thread Robby Findler
IMO, this is what one should expect from someone when an error is pointed out in their paper. It is a bit surprising to me that something like that got thru at HOSC, of all places, tho. Robby On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:41 PM, John Clements wrote: > Well, he's generous about it; here's what he h

[racket-dev] Fwd: Q. about "Directly Reflective" paper

2010-11-16 Thread John Clements
Well, he's generous about it; here's what he had to say. John Begin forwarded message: > From: Aaron Stump > Date: November 16, 2010 5:58:42 PM PST > To: John Clements > Subject: Re: Q. about "Directly Reflective" paper > Reply-To: ast...@cs.uiowa.edu > > Hi, John. > > I think you are right