Thanks, Matthew! It seems to build OK now.
Will
On Sep 11, 2011, at 6:42 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:38:44 -0500, "Will M. Farr" wrote:
>> The only wart in the process is the following: when compiling with clang or
>> llvm-gcc with the -O4 option, which enables link-tim
At Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:38:44 -0500, "Will M. Farr" wrote:
> The only wart in the process is the following: when compiling with clang or
> llvm-gcc with the -O4 option, which enables link-time optimization in the
> LLVM
> backend, the GC is unable to correctly determine the stack growth direction
50 minutes ago, Will M. Farr wrote:
> I believe that the resulting native code libraries make racket run
> faster, but haven't run any detailed tests (there was quite a gap
> between my last gcc-based build and my first clang-based one, so the
> improvements may also be due to Racket development).
Hello Racket Developers,
I thought I would write a quick note about building Racket on Mac OS X 10.6.8
with the new clang compiler (the new front-end to the LLVM compiler backend
that is becoming the standard compiler on Mac OS X for XCode 4 and later).
Overall, it's been a good experience. A
4 matches
Mail list logo
