Thanks for the info.
Binaries may still be good when one wants to install a package only for a
single purpose.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Although packages are not currently distributed in binary form, you can
install built packages (as
Although packages are not currently distributed in binary form, you can
install built packages (as available from a snapshot site) in binary
mode by supplying the `--binary' flag to `raco pkg install'.
For example, if you start with a Minimal Racket build from
Hi Laurent,
I think that the solution to this are binary builds versions of
a package that only have the bytecode and documentation.
We're a bit behind on binary builds, because when they were discussed
for the main repository [1] they were rejected. I hope to be able to
still provide them
great, thanks, that was quick!
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.eduwrote:
In the meantime, the images pkg is now broken up and images-lib depends
only on draw-lib (and some unstable stuff), no longer on the full gui
library or the docs.
Robby
On
In the meantime, the images pkg is now broken up and images-lib depends
only on draw-lib (and some unstable stuff), no longer on the full gui
library or the docs.
Robby
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Laurent laurent.ors...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds good!
I think as long as it's possible to
Sounds good!
I think as long as it's possible to somehow choose between byte-code and
source-code packages/distributions, there should not be too much to worry
about. My server would be very happy with byte-code packages, and my
desktop with a full source-code Racket.
Laurent
On Mon, Sep 16,
6 matches
Mail list logo
