Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.2.1, second call

2012-02-01 Thread Aleksej Saushev
  Hello!

Aleksej Saushev a...@inbox.ru writes:

 I'm testing racket-5.2.0.901 on NetBSD 5.99.59 i386.

 After applying patch as attached

Will the patch be applied at least to trunk?
It would be nice to have it applied to (pre)release branch too,
or is it too late?


-- 
HE CE3OH...

_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.2.1, second call

2012-02-01 Thread Robby Findler
Hi. Sorry-- we didn't get that in time to make it into the release,
but I've just pushed it to master. Thanks for the reminder.

Robby

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Aleksej Saushev a...@inbox.ru wrote:
  Hello!

 Aleksej Saushev a...@inbox.ru writes:

 I'm testing racket-5.2.0.901 on NetBSD 5.99.59 i386.

 After applying patch as attached

 Will the patch be applied at least to trunk?
 It would be nice to have it applied to (pre)release branch too,
 or is it too late?


 --
 HE CE3OH...

 _
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.2.1, second call

2012-01-25 Thread Aleksej Saushev
  Hello,

Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu writes:

 At Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:16:06 +0400, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
 I'm testing racket-5.2.0.901 on NetBSD 5.99.59 i386.
 
 After applying patch as attached, 

 Thanks!

 Section(deep)
 [1]   Illegal instruction (core dumped) (cd collects/tests/racket  racket 
 -f 
 quiet.rktl)
 
 [...]
 
 Any idea what can be wrong?

 This looks like a problem with Racket's inference of the stack size.

 In some BSD variants, enable pthread support makes the main thread have
 a different size than the usual stack limit. Did you specifically
 enable places, futures, or pthread when configuring? (I think they're
 off by default for NetBSD, but I may be mistaken.)

Of course I enable pthreads! Otherwise I have to expect and to deal
with failures at dynamic linking.

 Does configuring so
 that `-pthread' isn't used in the compiler command change the success
 of the deep.rktl test?

When I check source out of trunk:

$ git show
commit 0b3691691abfe73944f5209d9cad68a90de13257
Author: Ryan Culpepper ry...@racket-lang.org
Date:   Tue Jan 24 15:19:57 2012 -0700

db: fix sqlite3 #:use-place for raco exe

and perform the same tests on NetBSD 5.99.60 i386, I get result as
below. Perhaps the problem was fixed after branch or snapshot creation.
I can try to investigate it, but the racket builds is slowly there,
and you might know if there was anything that could possibly fix it.
If you know by chance, can you suggest particular revision or time frame
to reduce search?

Results of running tests:

Section(basic)
Section(unicode)
Section(rx)
Section(reading)
Section(readtable)
Section(printing)
Section(macro)
Section(syntax)
Section(procs)
Section(stx)
Section(module)
Section(numbers)
Section(unsafe)
Section(object)
Section(struct)
Section(unit)
Section(unit/sig)
Section(threads)
Section(logger)
Section(synchronization)
Section(deep)
Section(continuation-marks)
Section(prompt)
Section(wills)
Section(namespaces)
Section(modprot)
Section(chaperones)
Section(parameters)
Section(port)
Section(file)
Section(udp)
Section(file-after-udp)
Section(path)
Section(optimization)

Performed 92262 expression tests (81680 value expressions, 10582 exn 
expressions)
and 22656 exception field tests.

Errors were:
(Section (got expected (call)))
((optimization) (#f #t ((compile #t (lambda (a) (letrec ((x (lambda () (x 
(displayln a) (letrec ((y (lambda () (y (list (x) (y)) #f)))
((optimization) (#f #t ((compile #t (lambda (a) (letrec ((x (lambda () (x 
(letrec ((y (lambda () (y (list x y) #f)))
((optimization) (#f #t ((compile #t (lambda (a) (letrec ((x (lambda () (x 
(displayln x) (letrec ((y (lambda () (y (list x y) #f)))
((optimization) (#f #t ((compile #t (lambda (a) (define h (+ a a)) (letrec ((x 
(lambda () (y))) (y (lambda () (x (list (x) (y) h #f)))
(Other messages report successful tests of error-handling behavior.)
Section(names)

Performed 92309 expression tests (81725 value expressions, 10584 exn 
expressions)
and 22656 exception field tests.

Errors were:
(Section (got expected (call)))
((optimization) (#f #t ((compile #t (lambda (a) (letrec ((x (lambda () (x 
(displayln a) (letrec ((y (lambda () (y (list (x) (y)) #f)))
((optimization) (#f #t ((compile #t (lambda (a) (letrec ((x (lambda () (x 
(letrec ((y (lambda () (y (list x y) #f)))
((optimization) (#f #t ((compile #t (lambda (a) (letrec ((x (lambda () (x 
(displayln x) (letrec ((y (lambda () (y (list x y) #f)))
((optimization) (#f #t ((compile #t (lambda (a) (define h (+ a a)) (letrec ((x 
(lambda () (y))) (y (lambda () (x (list (x) (y) h #f)))
(Other messages report successful tests of error-handling behavior.)
Section(setup)
Section(for)
Section(list)
Section(math)
Section(vector)
Section(function)
Section(dict)
Section(contract)
Section(fixnum)
Section(flonum)
Section(mpair)
Section(etc)
Section(structlib)
Section(async-channel)
Section(restart)
Section(mzlib-string)
Section(path)
Section(filelib)
Section(portlib)
Section(threadlib)
Section(sets)
Section(date)
Section(compat)
Section(command-line)
Section(stream)
Section(sequence)
Section(generator)
Section(pconvert)
Section(pretty)
Section(control)
Section(serialization)
Section(packages)
Section(mzlib/contract)


TIMEOUT -- ABORTING!



-- 
HE CE3OH...

_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.2.1, second call

2012-01-24 Thread Noel Welsh
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
 * Noel Welsh noelwe...@gmail.com
  - Rackunit Tests
  - SRFI Tests
  - Ensure that all claimed srfi's are in the installer and they all
    load into racket or drracket (as appropriate)

DONE!

N.

_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.2.1, second call

2012-01-24 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
 * Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu,
   Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
  - Match Tests
  - Typed Racket Tests

Done, modulo the commit to the tests that I just pushed.

  - Typed Racket Updates: update HISTORY
  (updates should show v5.2.1 as the most current version; email me
  to pick the changes when they're done, or tell me if there are no such
  changes.)

Done in a few minutes.
-- 
sam th
sa...@ccs.neu.edu

_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.2.1, second call

2012-01-24 Thread Kathy Gray

On 20 Jan 2012, at 20:18, Ryan Culpepper wrote:

 * Kathy Gray kathryn.g...@cl.cam.ac.uk
  - Test Engine Tests

Done
-Kathy
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.2.1, second call

2012-01-24 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:

  - Typed Racket Updates: update HISTORY
  (updates should show v5.2.1 as the most current version; email me
  to pick the changes when they're done, or tell me if there are no such
  changes.)

Done.
-- 
sam th
sa...@ccs.neu.edu

_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.2.1, second call

2012-01-23 Thread Aleksej Saushev
  Hello!

Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu writes:

 Checklist items for the v5.2.1 release
   (using the v5.2.0.900 release candidate build)

5.2.0.901 doesn't build on NetBSD:

gcc -I./.. -I./../include -O2 -pthread -I/usr/pkg/include -I/usr/include 
-I/usr/pkg/include/freetype2  -Wall -I/usr/pkg/include -I/usr/include 
-I/usr/pkg/include/freetype2 -pthread-DNO_MBTOWC_FUNCTIONS -c ./port.c -o 
port.o
./port.c: In function 'scheme_alloc_global_fdset':
./port.c:792:77: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 
'struct mz_fd_set' 
./port.c: In function 'scheme_merge_fd_sets':
./port.c:1257:5: warning: implicit declaration of function 'FDSET_LIMIT'
./port.c:1259:7: error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment

I'm looking into it.


-- 
HE CE3OH...

_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.2.1, second call

2012-01-23 Thread Aleksej Saushev
  Hello!

Ryan Culpepper r...@cs.utah.edu writes:

 Checklist items for the v5.2.1 release
   (using the v5.2.0.900 release candidate build)

I'm testing racket-5.2.0.901 on NetBSD 5.99.59 i386.

After applying patch as attached, I am trying to run tests as follows:

(cd collects/tests/racket  racket -f quiet.rktl)

Racket crashes with this:

Section(basic)
Section(unicode)
Section(rx)
Section(reading)
Section(readtable)
Section(printing)
Section(macro)
Section(syntax)
Section(procs)
Section(stx)
Section(module)
Section(numbers)
Section(unsafe)
Section(object)
Section(struct)
Section(unit)
Section(unit/sig)
Section(threads)
Section(logger)
Section(synchronization)
Section(deep)
[1]   Illegal instruction (core dumped) (cd collects/tests/racket  racket -f 
quiet.rktl)

Backtrace:

Program terminated with signal 4, Illegal instruction.
#0  0xbb5a5d0a in ?? ()
#1  0xbb5a5d0f in ?? ()
#2  0xbb5a5d0f in ?? ()
...
#1274 0xbb5a5d0f in ?? ()
#1275 0xbb5a5d0f in ?? ()
#1276 0xbb5a5d0f in ?? ()
#1277 0x08083897 in scheme_do_eval ()
#1278 0x0808549b in do_eval_k ()
#1279 0x0807d965 in scheme_enlarge_runstack ()
#1280 0x08082ba5 in scheme_do_eval ()
#1281 0x080856a7 in _scheme_apply_from_native ()
#1282 0xbb5a5dcd in ?? ()
#1283 0xbb5a5d0f in ?? ()
#1284 0xbb5a5d0f in ?? ()
...
#6147 0xbb5a5d0f in ?? ()
#6148 0xbb5a5d0f in ?? ()
...
(I've stopped GDB here.)

Any idea what can be wrong?



-- 
HE CE3OH...


patch-src_racket_sconfig.h
Description: Binary data
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.2.1, second call

2012-01-23 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:16:06 +0400, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
 I'm testing racket-5.2.0.901 on NetBSD 5.99.59 i386.
 
 After applying patch as attached, 

Thanks!

 Section(deep)
 [1]   Illegal instruction (core dumped) (cd collects/tests/racket  racket 
 -f 
 quiet.rktl)
 
 [...]
 
 Any idea what can be wrong?

This looks like a problem with Racket's inference of the stack size.

In some BSD variants, enable pthread support makes the main thread have
a different size than the usual stack limit. Did you specifically
enable places, futures, or pthread when configuring? (I think they're
off by default for NetBSD, but I may be mistaken.) Does configuring so
that `-pthread' isn't used in the compiler command change the success
of the deep.rktl test?


Matthew

_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.2.1, second call

2012-01-23 Thread John Clements

On Jan 20, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:

 Checklist items for the v5.2.1 release
  (using the v5.2.0.900 release candidate build)
 
 * John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org
  - Stepper Updates: update HISTORY
  (updates should show v5.2.1 as the most current version; email me
  to pick the changes when they're done, or tell me if there are no such
  changes.)

Done.

John Clements



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v5.2.1, second call

2012-01-21 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:18:54 -0700, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
- mzc --exe tests
- Create an executable from a BSL program.

Done.

_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev