On May 4, 2014, at 16:01 , Geoffrey S. Knauth ge...@knauth.org wrote:
I did a ^C, restarted make, it blew through all the stuff it did before, and
now is taking a long time building the documentation again, currently again
at 100% CPU here:
raco setup: --- building documentation ---
raco
Thanks. I'm in the middle of build attempt #3. If it gets stuck, WILCO (I
will comply). It's currently roaring along. Next winter I think I'll heat my
house with raco setup. --Geoff
On May 4, 2014, at 16:15 , Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
I don't know what's causing
On May 4, 2014, at 16:44 , Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
That suggests to me that it is running of the of the examples in
/Users/gknauth/test/plt/git/plt/pkgs/racket-pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/guide/let.scrbl
that's causing the problem. Does this terminate:
$ racket
thanks. Unfortunately I cannot reproduce this on my machine but the thing I
would do if I could would be to start putting printfs in to try to find a
smaller programs that gets stuck.
Robby
On Sunday, May 4, 2014, Geoffrey S. Knauth ge...@knauth.org wrote:
On May 4, 2014, at 16:44 , Robby
I'm happy to insert printfs in my tree if you tell me where. --Geoff
On May 4, 2014, at 17:33 , Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
thanks. Unfortunately I cannot reproduce this on my machine but the thing I
would do if I could would be to start putting printfs in to try to find
The stack traces suggest it is in that one file. So if you open it up
and put a printf right before each example and then see when the
printfs stop, that'll probably tell us something good. You'd want to
look for each place where there is an example (compare the
documentation itself to the source)
Does this help? --Geoff
$ racket -l scribblings/guide/let.scrbl
GSK-1
GSK-2
C-c C-cuser break
context...:
/Users/gknauth/test/plt/git/plt/pkgs/sandbox-lib/racket/sandbox.rkt:883:2:
user-eval
/Users/gknauth/test/plt/git/plt/pkgs/scribble-pkgs/scribble-lib/scribble/eval.rkt:399:0:
Okay, that's just bizarre. If this were my machine, the next step I'd
take would be to make a copy of that file and start throwing stuff out
of it (running it at the command-line, not in drracket) until I got
very small and and still had the bad behavior. Like start by throwing
away everything
On May 4, 2014, at 19:20 , Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
start throwing stuff out of it (running it at the command-line, not in
drracket)
until I got very small and and still had the bad behavior.
I'm already small and have bad behavior, but I get your point.
PS: thanks
Oh! Well that code is clearly broken!
I guess you have a cyclic symbolic link in your temporary directory?
Or maybe just a ton of stuff?
Unless you want to, I'll push a change somehow or other.
Robby
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Geoffrey S. Knauth ge...@knauth.org wrote:
On May 4, 2014, at
On May 4, 2014, at 20:14 , Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Oh! Well that code is clearly broken!
I guess you have a cyclic symbolic link in your temporary directory?
Or maybe just a ton of stuff?
Unless you want to, I'll push a change somehow or other.
My /tmp looks like
Thanks for figuring this out!
Robby
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Geoffrey S. Knauth ge...@knauth.org wrote:
I'm happy to say that with that particular @interaction[...] deleted, the
rest of the build completed quickly and I now have a working DrRacket 6.0.1.6.
Geoff
12 matches
Mail list logo
