Re: [racket-dev] package system, minimal builds and more

2013-10-09 Thread Neil Toronto
On 10/01/2013 07:30 AM, Neil Toronto wrote: On 10/01/2013 09:20 AM, Tobias Hammer wrote: * monolithic math currently math is one big package and installing it pulls in nearly everything through the docs. Is it planned to split it into -lib and -doc? We were waiting for a reason. This is one.

Re: [racket-dev] package system, minimal builds and more

2013-10-07 Thread Tobias Hammer
All in one answer On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 15:30:11 +0200, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/01/2013 09:20 AM, Tobias Hammer wrote: * monolithic math currently math is one big package and installing it pulls in nearly everything through the docs. Is it planned to split it into -lib

Re: [racket-dev] package system, minimal builds and more

2013-10-03 Thread Robby Findler
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Tobias Hammer tobias.ham...@dlr.de wrote: Hi, i played a bit with the new package system, minimal installs and cross compiling. It works pretty good but i have a few problems and remarks/questions. I start with a fresh yesterdays minimal source

Re: [racket-dev] package system, minimal builds and more

2013-10-02 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Tobias Hammer tobias.ham...@dlr.de wrote: Hi, i played a bit with the new package system, minimal installs and cross compiling. It works pretty good but i have a few problems and remarks/questions. I start with a fresh yesterdays minimal source

Re: [racket-dev] package system, minimal builds and more

2013-10-02 Thread Jay McCarthy
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@cs.indiana.edu wrote: * redownload after fail the package manager seems to download every packet again after a failed install or user interruption. Would it be worth to reuse the once downloaded zips if the checksum is the same (similar