wrote:
>>
>> >+1
>> >
>> >If anyone wishes to be out of the PMC (during TLP process), they
>can send
>> >out an email to private list.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Selva-
>> >
>> &g
> >
> >Date: Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 3:53 PM
> >To: "dev@ranger.incubator.apache.org"
> >Subject: Re: To discuss on Apache Ranger PMCs
> >
> >We could include all members (Committer, Mentor) as PMC, unless the
memb
t; >From: Balaji Ganesan
> >Reply-To: "dev@ranger.incubator.apache.org"
> >
> >Date: Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 3:53 PM
> >To: "dev@ranger.incubator.apache.org"
> >Subject: Re: To discuss on Apache Ranger PMCs
> >
> >We could i
ist.
>
>Thanks,
>Selva-
>
>From: Balaji Ganesan
>Reply-To: "dev@ranger.incubator.apache.org"
>
>Date: Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 3:53 PM
>To: "dev@ranger.incubator.apache.org"
>Subject: Re: To discuss on Apache Ranger PMCs
>
>We
t;
Subject: Re: To discuss on Apache Ranger PMCs
We could include all members (Committer, Mentor) as PMC, unless the member
has a specific objection not to be part of PMC. Any pitfalls with this
approach ?
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Ramesh Mani wrote:
Hello Rangers,
As part of Range
We could include all members (Committer, Mentor) as PMC, unless the member
has a specific objection not to be part of PMC. Any pitfalls with this
approach ?
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Ramesh Mani wrote:
> Hello Rangers,
>
> As part of Ranger TLP preparation I need to provide the number o
